Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsview: Strategy on Miers Backfiring

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:33 AM
Original message
Newsview: Strategy on Miers Backfiring
WASHINGTON (AP) -

The White House is trying to have it both ways in marketing Harriet Miers to disgruntled Republicans.

To conservatives, the president's aides talk up a 1989 document showing she held clear anti-abortion views. Then they pivot and tell everyone else those were just the personal views of a candidate for the Dallas City Council and not a sign of how she might vote on the Supreme Court.

Bush emphasized last week that "part of Harriet Miers' life is her religion." Almost immediately, White House spokesman Scott McClellan complained that too much was being made of her membership in an evangelical Christian church.

Bush said he knows her heart and that she won't change. Except she has. She was a Catholic when she was young. And she was a Democrat who turned Republican.

more...

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-scotus/2005/oct/19/101904333.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's weird. I somehow suspected she was a Catholic.
When I checked it out, I couldn't find any definitive tie to a particular church. Lo and behold, she's a lapsed Catholic. We have some serious ethical problems with the Church, then, especially considering her crush on a married man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Worse, she and Hecht are evangelicals
Frolicking without either marriage or procreation for over THIRTY years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. A fun-loving fornicator on the Supreme Court?
Wait. Won't that make Scalia's wife jealous, or does she agree with Fat Tony's concept that orgies are a good thing?

I'm so confused :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. The whole thing of nominating her to the courts is weirdo,
why not nominate me then ?????

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sorry, minimum qualification is adoration of the Dubya
could YOU stomach that?

Office Wives Incorporated. Adoring the Chimp so you don't have ta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC