Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seattle P-I editorial (Wed.): Withdraw Miers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 12:11 AM
Original message
Seattle P-I editorial (Wed.): Withdraw Miers
Edited on Wed Oct-19-05 12:12 AM by Newsjock
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/245036_miersed.asp?dpfrom=thead

SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD

President Bush should withdraw the nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court.

... It's not that there is so much wrong with Miers, as it is that there is not enough right about her.

Has she so much as handled a case involving the Constitution, written an article on a constitutional issue or taught constitutional law? In what memorable public debates on constitutional law has she partaken?

... Placed against our template of what a Supreme Court justice should be, the profound responsibilities that come with the job and the essential role of the judiciary in the balance of powers, Miers is not qualified, let alone exceptionally well so.

... Naming a justice to the Supreme Court is a rare and profound moment. The president and the nation can, and must, do far better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Three Cheers for the SP-I
hits it on all cylinders !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The conundrum is whether she would be replaced by someone worse
There are many strident jurists (including female) whom I would hate to see nominated.
I just don't know what to think.

Should we agree with the P-I or not?

I think they should have waited for the hearings.

I don't want to make it too easy for Patricia Owens or Janice Rogers Brown to get the nomination.

b_b
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC