Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Investigator of CIA leak seen as relentless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Nightwing Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:02 AM
Original message
Investigator of CIA leak seen as relentless
I love the line, "they could not have picked a worse person."
Looks like * finally chose someone he could not buy. :toast:



WASHINGTON — When defense attorney Ron Safer heard that Patrick Fitzgerald would lead an inquiry into the leak of a CIA operative's name, his first thought was that, from the Bush administration's perspective, "they could not have picked a worse person."

Safer, a Chicago lawyer who has watched Fitzgerald since he was named U.S. attorney there in 2001, says the prosecutor "will bring to this the same energy and aggression that he does to every other project he undertakes."

<snip>

"To say that he is extremely aggressive is, I think, a gross understatement," Safer says. When he's arguing a motion, Safer says, Fitzgerald is "not disrespectful, but he's a lot less deferential than I bet most judges are accustomed to."

<snip>

Chuck Rosenberg, a Fitzgerald friend who is U.S. attorney in Houston, was asked recently why Fitzgerald is going after reporters. "I said to them, 'Pat isn't going after journalists, he is after the truth,' " Rosenberg says. "He's exactly the kind of person you'd want doing something like this."

Link: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-10-10-fitzgerald_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. as relentless as Ken Starr, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kharma happens n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Just as relentless, but with better reason. This is one hell of a big
case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That it is! Wonder if it will reach Bush himself?


After last NOvember, I never imagined that the Rove regime would take such a tumble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think it *should*, but I don't know whether Fitz will be able to build
his case that far. Once the WH is in full damage control mode, you never know what they're going to do. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Indeed. I'll bet Fitz found more than a blow job though. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Ken Starr Wasn't Worthy to Wipe Fitz's Ass
Fitz is to Starr as Michael Jordan is to an ant. Fitz is a serious prosecutor who actually wants to prosecute a real honest to goodness crime and who wants to actually develop a real case. Starr was a hack who was only interested in smearing Clintion in any way he could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not only relentless, but tight lipped as well...
and this is no doubt driving the * admin. crazy. You can bet that they are having endless discussions on whether or not to do preemptive spin damage control or not. They don't have enough information to determine what would be the best tact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broadslidin Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Who Could Possibly Imagine The Thoughts Going Through The Mind Of
The Paranoid Malignant:yoiks:Narcissist Sociopath this morning
as Karl Rove (current aka: "Turd Blossom")
whispers in his ear, 'The Perfect Plan'
for eliminating Patrick Fitzgerald....!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. They're dipping their toes in the waters of the old smear-a-roo. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Great Article - kicking for the gloomy gus DU'ers who claim Fitz is repug
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 10:09 AM by emulatorloo
crony:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-10-10-fitzgerald_x.htm

<snip>

"He has no agenda," says David Kelley, former U.S. attorney in New York and a longtime friend. "He looks at the facts, uncovers the facts and goes where the facts lead him."
Mary Jo White, who was Fitzgerald's boss when she was U.S. attorney in Manhattan, says she knows nothing about his political views — "if he has any, and he may not."

Fitzgerald, who declined interview requests, is registered to vote with no party affiliation.

Defense lawyers have a different perspective. Scott Mendeloff, a Chicago lawyer who specializes in corporate fraud cases and formerly tried and supervised public corruption prosecutions in the U.S. attorney's office, says Fitzgerald demonstrates "a more black-and-white view of the world" that is "reductionist in disregarding nuances beyond what it will take to prevail." Some defense lawyers, he says, believe Fitzgerald is "not prone to consider what some would term humane factors in charging and sentencing decisions."

"To say that he is extremely aggressive is, I think, a gross understatement," Safer says. When he's arguing a motion, Safer says, Fitzgerald is "not disrespectful, but he's a lot less deferential than I bet most judges are accustomed to."

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC