Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Ready to Slime Fitzgerald :Joe Conason

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:29 PM
Original message
Republicans Ready to Slime Fitzgerald :Joe Conason
Republicans Ready
to Slime Fitzgerald
By Joe Conason

http://www.observer.com/opinions_conason.asp

Circled in a bristling perimeter around the White House, the friends and allies of Mr. Rove can soon be expected to fire their rhetorical mortars at Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor investigating the White House exposure of C.I.A. operative Valerie Wilson. Indeed, the preparations for that assault began months ago in the editorial columns of The Wall Street Journal, which has tarred Mr. Fitzgerald as a “loose cannon” and an “unguided missile.”

Evidently Senator Pat Roberts, the Kansas Republican who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, will lead the next foray against the special prosecutor. This week the Senator’s press office announced his plan to hold hearings on the Fitzgerald probe. That means interfering with an “ongoing investigation,” as the White House press secretary might say, but such considerations won’t deter the highly partisan Kansan.

Of course, it was Mr. Rove’s aggressively partisan style that first sparked the scandal now threatening to ruin him, back when he and other Bush administration officials “outed” Ms. Wilson in an attempt to discredit her dissenting husband during the summer of 2003. Had they not decided to leak classified information for partisan purposes, there would be no grand jury pondering indictments today.

Such ironies won’t discourage the Rove Republicans from pursuing the scorched-earth strategy that has served them so well, however. Nor will those politicians and pundits pause to consider how odd their complaints about an overreaching special prosecutor will sound, emanating from once-fervent supporters of former independent counsel Kenneth Starr and his Whitewater legal jihad.

From their perspective, it’s all part of the same cynical game. If Mr. Starr was subject to sharp criticism, then Mr. Fitzgerald should be a legitimate target, too. They won’t remember how they once decried Mr. Starr’s critics for “obstructing justice.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course Fitz is a "loose cannon"
isn't that what an independent prosecutor is supposed to be? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald is one of their own, is he not.....
....appointed by pResident Bush to "get to the bottom of this investigation". So, are the rethuglicans sliming Fitzgerald
because he failed to go all the way to the bottom where he would turn up nothing and instead he is getting close to the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. This one will backfire on them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good Grief.
The intelligence committee chairman is quite willing to investigate the investigation of a intelligence security failure, BUT NOT THE FAILURE ITSELF.

I say, give Mr. Fitzgerald a 70 million dollar budget, and a mandate to investigate anything that catches his eye about the Bush admin... do to Bush what they did to Clinton, and see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. 70 million wouldn't even cover...
the printing costs of what Bush has done wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. smearing works
if the American people would discover some class and not be swayed by it, no one would use it anymore.
but peopel are stupid and perverted and love that crap
what ever helps them to avoid questioning their presuposed Ideology...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. The difference, this time, is that the media will not be on their side
which can make ALL the difference. Of course, Fitzgerald may well want to subpoena Senator Roberts to discover whether HE had any meetings with White House officials to kick off his investigation.

Can a Senator claim "executive privilege"?

Would he have the balls to lie to a Grand Jury, even for the Clown Prince?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Huh?
From what I can tell, the media wholly and completely behind the far right- to the extent that it nothing more than a propaganda wing for the Republican party.

No- every single American network and the vast majority of all of the newspapers will bend over backwards to protect the Republicans from pretty well any exposure of the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC