Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Nichols (The Nation): Rove Defense Team

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:41 AM
Original message
John Nichols (The Nation): Rove Defense Team
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 10:43 AM by Jack Rabbit
From The Nation
Dated Friday July 15


Rove Defense Team
By John Nichols

It appears that no one in Washington has bothered to ask why it is that the Republican National Committee is leading the defense of Karl Rove. But it's a good question.

If Rove is really the president's deputy chief of staff in charge of policy, as opposed to a political hack operating within the White House and using taxpayer money to do the work of the Republican Party, wouldn't it make sense that his defenders would be current and retired policy specialists? And since the controversy in which he is embroiled has something to do with national security, wouldn't it be at least a little more assuring if a former Secretary of Defense, National Security Adviser or chief of the Central Intelligence Agency were to speak up on his behalf?

But, no, as the controversy about his leaking of classified information heats up, Rove is being defended, for the most part, by RNC chair Ken Mehlman, a political operative who has never been seriously involved in policy matters – let alone national security issues.

Mehlman is a second-string hack, a veteran of the losing presidential campaigns of George Bush I in 1992 and Mr. Elizabeth Dole in 1996.

Read more.

The GOP talking points are either easily refuted or red herrings. Wilson's trip to Niger in February 2002 was properly authorized; people CIA chose him to go after the agency was tasked by someone in Mr. Cheney's office to look into a memorandum of agreement between the governments of Niger and Iraq for the former to sell yellowcake to the latter; the document, as reported by even Robert Novak in the piece that started the criminal investigation, was a forgery. Mr. Cheney did not directly request Ambassador Wilson to go to Niger, and Ambassador Wilson, contrary to the current set of GOP talking points, has never made any such claim. The CIA sent Wilson, not Valerie Plame on her own account in some elaborate conspiracy to embarrass the administration over a year later. What part Ms. Plame made in choosing Wilson is entirely irrelevant.

What we have here is a smear campaign against the Wilsons. We've seen this from this administration before in their attempts to discredit critics of Mr. Bush's ill-advised misadventure into Iraq. we saw it from the administration of elder Bush; just ask Anita Hill. One might begin to wonder if this sort of thing is a Bush family value.

Whatever fancy title they choose to give him, Karl Rove is nothing but a glorified political hatchet man. It is fitting that other hatchet men come to his defense and defend him with a battery of lie, half truths and red herrings.

Having failed to discredit Wilson two years ago, they are back at it again as concern grows that Rove will face criminal charges. Repeating that Wilson is a liar over and over and spelling it in all capital letters will not make him one. And he is not one.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did you notice this?
Mehlman is a second-string hack, a veteran of the losing presidential campaigns of George Bush I in 1992 and Mr. Elizabeth Dole in 1996.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. The one question asked here does intrigue me.
If Rove is so innocent, WHY HASN'T SOMEONE FROM THE CIA COME TO HIS DEFENSE?

In fact, NO high level member of the admin has done so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because the CIA is who is trying to bring him down
You think they are happy about one of their agents being outed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Of course not! That's not what I meant.
IF a person inside an administration is being accused of something that is FALSE, and the Department really believed the accusations were FALSE, someone would speak out, I would think. Of course, I didn't see anyone running to Tenet's defense either!

Oh, I think the reason they aren't saying anything iIS because they're pi**ed! I gotta tell ya, if I were Rove, or anyone involved in this outing, I'd rather have Fitz against me than the CIA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Hope the CIA is Going to Rat On ALL of BushCo
Let the CIA take out Dubya AND his dad. That will show where the balance of power should be--in the hands of real public servants, instead of fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Interesting
I suppose their reply would be that they will not to comment on an ongoing criminal investigation. As long as there were no solid facts in public, they could say what they were saying for two years; now, that has little credibility.

The fact that Bush gives a weak defense of Rove has me believing he will be gone soon. A few days ago, I said he'll be gone in about a week, but it looks like it will be a little longer now. This smear campaign has to be given a chance to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Heard on NPR this AM that Mehlman
is one of Rove's protege's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No surprise
One would think that Rove himself could have orchestrated this smear campaign. They all channel Lee Atwater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Whoever it was, there WAS a coordination of sources and confirmations!
Rove and at least one other official will be indicted.

Now we know Rove is both a main source (for Cooper) and a confirming source for another (Novak, from whom he got Plame's name). With 6 initial sources and at least 3 confirming sources (both as reported), someone would have to coordinate the operation, assuring the initial callers that no two called the same source, that no one was overly eager, but would "drop it in," and a number of other officials would be ready and willing to confirm.


Therefore at least 2 people(Rove and Novak's initial source, perhaps Scooter Libby if today's reports pan out) served as main sources. (The fact that one source released Cooper from his agreement of confidentiality but one source did not release Miller also suggests at least 2 sources.) Rove would have to coordinate! To establish guidelines like: No source should call another's contact, Pitch the information off hand, not as the main subject, Make the contact think the source is trying to do him or her a favor ("Don't go too far out on this Wilson thing, I don't want you burnt."), etc. AND Rove would have had to field a group of officials to support the sources stories.

I say Rove coordinated because it is obvious he did so since anyone in the administration in possession of the Plame-Wilson-CIA link would have gone straight to the world master of deceitful politics, and now we know Rove was at least one of the leakers.

So, we could have at least 2 indictments for Rove (exposing and conspiring to expose) and (perhaps) 1 or more indictments for others (Novak and/or Miller's source). Not to mention exposure of those who condoned and confirmed the exposure.

I think the great thing we have going for us on this case is Patrick Fitzgerald. By all accounts a fine prosecutor.


Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, That's Good.
The more they get involved, the more GOP based terroristws and traitors get stuck to this tar baby, the better it will be for the US. Time to clean House, Senate, and the Big WH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC