|
Okay, the worthy editors at the NYT finally gave the Downing Street Minutes some coverage this week. Sound of one hand clapping. This comes fully six weeks after the Times of London first published the story.
The NYT and the rest of the American corporate media continue to dismiss the story as nothing new, and the memos as insignificant. Quite untrue. The significance of the DSM are that these official UK documents prove -- to a very high legal standard -- that Blair and Bush had "fixed" intelligence, and were hard at work ramping up an invasion fully half a year before Blair and Powell brought their case to the UN. War was not the "last option", as was publicly claimed. Now firmly established, it was the plan all along, and heads of government on both sides of the Atlantic knowingly lied to get their legislatures to approve resolutions authorizing troops to invade Iraq. Those who voted for these measures can now say they were duped.
Here, folks, is the hard evidence of a campaign of deceit that, ultimately, would be required to remove the American President for "high crimes and misdemeanors." That, perhaps, is too much for the worthies in the Manhattan editorial suites to contemplate. Maybe they should start -- Blair has already announced he does not plan to be living at No. 10 Downing Street, the Prime Minister's residence, when this session of the British Parliament ends in 2009 or 2010.
Well, a month and a half of concerted effort by Democratic grass-roots to get the story into the mainstream papers have begun to bear fruit. The New York Times, the bell-weather of the establishment media, actually carried stories these past few days.
Before that, the NYT practically ignored the story. The paper's search engine reveals that there was no news coverage in the NYT before June 7 that included the phrase "Downing Street Memo", and not a word except for the Times ombudsman on June 5 and Paul Krugman's May 16th column. (It's not clear what was printed on May 8 in the Magazine Desk column, since we now have to pay $$$ to find out:grr:) Krugman was again a lonely pioneer.
Here's the DSM record for America's "paper of record" (first 20 in NYT search engine - excludes pre-May 1, 2005 results with the same words):
Sort by: Newest First | Oldest First | Closest Match Displaying 1 - 20 of 156309 | Next>> WASHINGTON | June 17, 2005 Antiwar Group Says Leaked British Memo Shows Bush Misled Public on His War Plans By SCOTT SHANE (NYT) News
WASHINGTON | June 17, 2005 Antiwar Group Says Leaked British Memo Shows Bush Misled Public on His War Plans By SCOTT SHANE (NYT) News
WASHINGTON | June 16, 2005 'Exit Strategy' Is More Than a Whisper in Washington, With Lawmakers Speaking Out By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG (NYT) News
WASHINGTON | June 16, 2005 Small Bipartisan Group in House Presses for Iraq Exit Strategy By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG (NYT) News
OPINION | June 15, 2005 Truth About the War, Before the War (NYT) Letter
WASHINGTON | June 14, 2005 A Peephole to the War Room: British Documents Shed Light on Bush Team's State of Mind By TODD S. PURDUM (NYT) News
WASHINGTON | June 13, 2005 Prewar British Memo Says War Decision Wasn't Made By DAVID E. SANGER (NYT) News
OPINION | June 12, 2005 Don't Follow the Money By FRANK RICH (NYT) Op-Ed
FOREIGN DESK | June 8, 2005, Wednesday $ Bush and Blair Deny 'Fixed' Iraq Reports By ELISABETH BUMILLER (NYT) 979 words
FOREIGN DESK | June 7, 2005, Tuesday $ Blair, Due to Meet Bush, Will Push 2 Issues By RICHARD W. STEVENSON (NYT) 1118 words
EDITORIAL DESK | June 5, 2005, Sunday THE PUBLIC EDITOR; The New Public Editor: Toward Greater Transparency By Byron Calame (NYT) Op-Ed 1454 words
EDITORIAL DESK | May 16, 2005, Monday $ Staying What Course? By PAUL KRUGMAN (NYT) Op-Ed 740 words
FOREIGN DESK | June 10, 2005, Friday $ British Press Scolds Mrs. Blair Over a Speech in the U.S By ALAN COWELL (NYT) 964 words
DINING IN, DINING OUT/STYLE DESK | June 8, 2005, Wednesday RESTAURANTS; Chinese Gets Dressed Up for a Change By Frank Bruni (NYT) Review 1207 words
MAGAZINE DESK | May 8, 2005, Sunday $ The Fathers' Crusade By Susan Dominus (NYT) 7907 words
For all of you at DU who've worked so hard to get the DSM into the MSM, thank you, it's finally beginning to happen.:applause: For the editors of the Times, who apparently didn't learn anything from the paper's Iraq WMD mistakes -- you even have Judith Miller back writing stories. Putz. :grr: :thumbsdown: :bounce:
|