Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lampley 05/27 - The Worst and the Dumbest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 06:26 PM
Original message
Lampley 05/27 - The Worst and the Dumbest
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/jim-lampley/the-worst-and-the-dumbest_1743.html

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld kicked off the Memorial Day weekend by proclaiming to Ft. Bragg's 82nd Airborne troops that a wounded Abu Musab al Zarqawi was now like HItler in his bunker, firing off in all directions at the bitter end approaches. Ten hours later Al Qaeda claimed on its website that al Zarqawi is alive and well and fully engaged in Jihad. And the war of words continues, oblivious to what goes on in the streets of Baghdad. Where have we seen this before?

In the process of helping my sixteen-year-old with a term paper last week, I had occasion to re-read David Halberstam's The Best and The Brightest and Neil Sheehan's A Bright Shining Lie. It was striking to recall how once the Pentagon was in control of all communication out of Saigon, beginning in earnest about 1964, government accounts of the war employed no political or social context to help establish what was really going on in Vietnam. The military perspective was that the South Vietnamese were being threatened by Communism, and ought to be just as fearful of that as we were on their behalf, and by God, as soon as they would simply learn to stand up and fight for themselves the right way this thing would be handled. For Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, Commanding General William Westmoreland and their support staffs, the politics of anti-Communism were unequivocal, irreversible and blinding. The South Vietnamese in general, the Army of Vietnam in particular, shared little of their true believer conviction, and that in the end was decisive.

In Baghdad they're calling in 40,000 Iraqi troops to shut down the city and stop all this nonsense once and for all. By God, as soon as they learn to stand up and fight for themselves the right way this thing will be handled. The true believers haven't wavered, regardless of what's really going on in the streets.

<snip>

Is it any different this time? Well, consider this: there's a $25 million bounty on al Zarqawi's head, and the Iraqi government supported by American troops can't induce anyone to tip us off as to where he might be. How long do you think a fugitive would last in America with that price on his soul? American Commanders in Vietnam used to scratch their heads in wonder that Vietcong soldiers would crawl for miles underground to fight them and die. That kind of emotional fuel isn't something we easily comprehend.

The 82nd Airborne Division troops who dutifully sat and listened to Rumsfeld can reflect with pride on their unit's blood commitment to duty and honor and respect: 42 soldiers killed, 450 wounded so far in Iraq. This weekend is for them, and for their forebears in Vietnam, and not for their masters of war. By now we surely should see through their masks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. al Zarqawi the safest kind of enemy America can have
because he doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC