Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It's the God, guns and gays wedge issue,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 09:18 PM
Original message
"It's the God, guns and gays wedge issue,"



I never expected to see this happen in Wisconsin!!!!!!!!
Worth reading the whole article!



http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/local/index.php?ntid=41357&ntpid=5
Lampert Smith:

It's about what families value

00:00 am 5/26/05
Susan Lampert Smith Wisconsin State Journal


Now that Assembly Speaker John Gard and his pals have killed health insurance for domestic partners of University of Wisconsin System employees, can we please stop pretending?

It's not about the money.

If it was about the money, legislators would have accepted language from Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Madison, to allow the System to compete for employees by offering the benefits, providing they did so with existing money.

If it was about the money, they might have read the Legislative Fiscal Bureau report that suggests the benefits could cost less than the $500,000 Gov. Jim Doyle set aside for them. Since every other Big Ten university offers these benefits, the bureau looked at them and found that less than 1 percent of employees apply for these benefits. At the University of Minnesota, which offers insurance to same-sex partners, that amounted to 89 of 16,000 employees. At Michigan, it was 213 of 30,000 employees. And at Iowa, which offers insurance to any unmarried couple, 63 of 13,000 employees took the insurance........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. As a state issue, domestic parnter benefits cost LESS money than
not offering them. The reason is that the partner may otherwise be uninsured and costing the state money. In the long run, everyone benefits by allowing this coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC