Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The case against Galloway was "forged", asserts a British paper

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:44 PM
Original message
The case against Galloway was "forged", asserts a British paper
The central document used against George Galloway this week by the US senate committee investigating Iraq's oil for food programme is a forgery. Socialist Worker can reveal that evidence crucial to the alleged case against the Respect MP is fake - created after the fall of Baghdad in 2003.

The allegations are another desperate attempt to smear the opponents of the war on Iraq, and to make them appear as the corrupt hirelings of tyranny.

In Britain the material is another dirty weapon to be employed in an effort to destroy George Galloway and halt the rise of Respect.

Most of the accusations hurled against George Galloway by the senate committee on investigations this week were based on testimony that was supposedly freely given by former officials in Saddam Hussein's regime who are now held by US forces.

Link: http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2005/05/19/59860.html


Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. his crime
was compassion for the victims of the sanctions who were suffering and dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. His crime was giving voice to his compassion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing angers the Executive worse than dissenting AND being right.
Look at the vendetta they have against ElBaradei.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Stay away from slime if you do not want to be slimed. Galloway
did not. If he didn't know his 'best friend' was making money off the sanctions and so was Saddam Hussein..he was all too naive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I didn't get that as his position.
It was more like: "Sure he was, everybody was, he was doing lots
of business with Saddam, but I didn't inquire as to the details".

And I infer from that that he didn't really give a shit where the
money came from, he was out to help the Iraqi kid(s).

But of course, opinions will vary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry - I didn't read the transcript. But yeah - if he didn't care then
he didn't care if he got slimed. So now he is slimed. He makes great points about Rumsfield being slimed too - and for lesser reasons (Rumsfield sold weapons..Galloway was concerned about kids). Which is great of him to do. Clarify the issue.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think you have it more or less.
I don't know that he's a shining light of morality, he's a politician
so I assume he's a liar, but I don't think he went there to claim
sainthood, far from it, he went there to paste them in the chops.
I think that's what surprised the senators, they expected him to try
to defend himself, and for the most part he preferred to attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, didn't do their homework on Gorgeous George did they?
He's considered to be a real carnivore by even British rhetorical standards. Skill, wit and ruthlessness are not UNcommon in the House of Commons. Norm, whom I am sure still moves his lips when he reads, didn't have a chance.


Reminds me of the Monty Python "documentary" about the infamous Piranha brothers. While Dinsdale nailed his victims' heads to the floor, his brother Doug uses a terrifying combination of "sarcasm, parody, double-entendres and satire."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. As I said elsewhere, the single stupidest political move I've seen
in my lifetime. I'm scots, and I know the look, and watching
him sit there waiting his turn to talk, there was no doubt in
my mind what was going to happen. It was clear he went in there
well prepared and not to be swayed from his course. These rubes
are used to dealing with people that are easily intimidated and
risk averse. There is nothing like the combination of arrogance
and ignorance to get you fucked up, and boy did Norm deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well now, it would only be a stupid political move if we had a free press
It's been buried on pgs A18, etc. My mother in Ohio hadn't even heard of it or of George Galloway, so I'm sending her a clip and a transcript as a belated Mother's Day gift. Yes, I know what you mean about the look, although I'm only half scots through ancestry. Those reptilian, glittering eyes, waiting with icy calm for the stupid bunny to shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Scots are reptilian? I thought they were dour and honest? n/t
Edited on Fri May-20-05 12:04 AM by applegrove
Tenatious, stubborn, hardworking, types who hate crooks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Tsk.
He didn't say anything about scots being reptilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Try reading it my way? I had hoped he wasn't saying that. I tried
reading it your way.. and the reptilian eyes were watching a dumb bunny, and Galloway was not the dumb bunny that day?

Is it me? Is it too late or something? Should I just go to sleep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It says: "Those reptilian, glittering eyes ..."
Nothing about reptilian scots, and a perfectly clear simile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Reptilian scots. I just had a vision of Godzilla in a kilt n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mokito Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Yes, and everybody loved Dinsdale,
but never you utter the name Doug!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's the original link (from the Russian piece)
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php4?article_id=6511

This has an image of the alleged forgery. If this is the actual document and not some sort of hoax, it wouldn't hold up for five minutes in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nothing produced against him would hold up in any court
Except a court who's judges sit in dread fear of crossing the neo-cons like ours!

Well, why DO we have such an outrageous percentage of the U.S. population in jail right now? And that's not even counting all those effectively blacklisted out of many kinds of employment by various neo-con fed information systems...a larger number than those affected by witch-hunts of the 1950's.

And so many of the "leaders" of the supposed "opposition" remain in denial about the Bush Administration's role in orchestrating 9/11, and even about the very easy electronic fraud which makes it impossible for this fear-paralyzed "opposition" to win any really crucial election. That's all the ingredients for Fascism right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC