Molly Ivins: Christian right goes nuclear

[Dudley_DUright]

I was all set to write a column about the nuclear option -- the proposal to change the rules of the Senate in order to get President Bush's most questionable judicial appointments through -- when, lo, word came that there is no nuclear option anymore. It is now called "the constitutional option."

Who changed it? Why, the Republican Party, of course. Having found that "nuclear option" does not poll well, the Republicans simply decreed the rules change can no longer be described by that name. Further, the Republican Party sent media operatives around to major news organizations to inform them that anyone who fails to obey the new diktat on usage will be demonstrating the dread "liberal bias."

Since this particularly fateful rules change was first christened "the nuclear option" by Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi in 2003, and has been called "the nuclear option" ever since -- by Republicans, along with everybody else -- I have to say this is a distinctly Orwellian development.

In fact, given the implicit threat that the Republican Party faithful will be encouraged to denounce all news outlets that do not conform to this new political correctness, I'd say it is not only ridiculous but also dangerous, quite a feat.

more...

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=18952

[oldtime dfl_er]

1. mediamatters.org has a piece on this

and the fact that the MSM is trying to pin the coining of that phrase on the Democrats. An excellent and important point.


www.cafepress.com/showtheworld

[Dudley_DUright]

2. Thank for pointing that out oldtime dfl_er

Here is the link to the media matters story you mention:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200504260001

PS You must be from Minnesota where the dems are Democratic_Farm_Labor_ers. I use to live there myself lo these many years ago. :-)