Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intel: Did Bolton Try to Intimidate Spies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-05 10:32 PM
Original message
Intel: Did Bolton Try to Intimidate Spies?
Intel: Did Bolton Try to Intimidate Spies?

Bolton: Influencing intelligence?

By Mark Hosenball
Investigative Correspondent
Newsweek

April 11 issue - Bush critics in the Senate are hunting for evidence to derail or delay confirmation of State Department official John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Foreign Relations Committee staffers are looking into charges that Bolton attempted to intimidate or victimize two career intelligence officials for what he viewed as their insufficiently alarmist analyses of intel on purported Cuban biological weapons. Committee investigators have contacted both the State Department and the intel community seeking records and witnesses. But Bolton's opponents are unsure if they will be able to make their case in time for Bolton's confirmation hearing Thursday.

snip

. . . But State Department WMD analyst Christian Westermann testified that he tangled with Bolton about a speech on Cuban germ warfare. According to a Senate intel committee report, Westermann says he sent the CIA an e-mail proposing changes in Bolton's speech. Bolton later got a copy of the e-mail, "berated" Westermann and tried to have the analyst transferred. Westermann wasn't reassigned.

The second case Bolton's congressional critics are examining involves a senior intelligence-community Latin America analyst. Congressional and administration sources say Bush foreign-policy aides—including Bolton and Otto Reich, a top policymaker on Latin America—tried to have the analyst, who today serves undercover, fired. They then tried to block him from being promoted because they believed he was too soft on Cuba, and because he was once assigned to President Bill Clinton's National Security Council.

more
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7369509/site/newsweek





Pig.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. You push these people hard enough, and they will push back.
What recently "retired" intelligence professionals did in 1980, their colleagues can undo today.

They are professional regime changers, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. FUCKING KICK!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7369509/site/newsweek/

from www.warandpiece.com:


Talk about political pressure on US intelligence analysts! Check out Mark Hosenball's latest on Bolton. Which part of trying to get an intel analyst transferred who disagreed with Bolton's pronouncements that Cuba was producing bioweapons couldn't be considered political "pressure?" And trying to get another one fired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC