Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National health insurance: the wrong Rx

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:58 AM
Original message
National health insurance: the wrong Rx
National health insurance: the wrong Rx

By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | March 22, 2005

THERE IS a bumper sticker on the car ahead of me as I drive down Interstate 93. In white letters on a navy background, it proclaims: ''Single-Payer Health Care!'' That's it. There is no argument, no attempt at logic or emotion or humor -- just an impatient demand for the drastic transformation of one-seventh of the US economy. And note the exclamation point. That is to communicate earnestness, certitude, and indignation -- classic elements of the liberal approach to policymaking: When promoting radical change, passion and good intentions are what matter most. Real-world consequences count for far less.


http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/03/22/national_health_insurance_the_wrong_rx/

I can't stand Jacoby...but this is really too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Tell that to the uninsured in America...
I have stated this before: Waiting for care is a whole lot better than not getting care!

(I am sure Jacoby receives all the medical care he desires)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jacoby expects a dissertation on a bumper sticker?
He should get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. What a putz..............
let's take one sentence of this vile screed and substitute just ONE word for another, ready?

"That is to communicate earnestness, certitude, and indignation -- classic elements of the Republican approach to policymaking: When promoting radical change, passion and good intentions are what matter most. Real-world consequences count for far less."

Notice I've replaced, "Liberal", with "Republican". Now how could we apply this same reasoning to Republicans? Let me count the ways.....

Terri Shiavo- The dog and pony show the slugs have made out of this poor woman's misfortune. There's certainly a lot of "passion" and "radical change" proposed by them in this misadventure.

Iraq- Passion and good intentions. Isn't that what the Slugs are claiming now instead of finding all of those WMD's that were spilling out of warehouses everywhere in the country?

Social Security- Passion and good intentions? To hear the Slugs describe it, that's exactly what they're doing. They're intend to "help" us with our Social Security program, and it seems like they're being quite passionate about ramming it down our throats, whether we want it or not.

Those are but a few. This supposed journalist can't see the proverbial forest for the Republican trees in his eye. Of course I've grown to expect nothing less from these neo-con shills, always blaming the left for the shortcomings of the right.

Do we have another bush toady on the White House payroll here? It certainly sounds like it to me.

I guess health care belongs to only the rich. Or someone with irreparable brain damage that can score them some points with their radical right, lunatic fringe, god squad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. He probably has a good insurance plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. RW Jacoby has his usual RW lies to sell
He quotes a John C. Goodman, president of the National Center for Policy Analysis, saying "rationing by waiting is pervasive, putting patients at risk and keeping them in pain" - as if rationing by lack of insurance is better.

Then he sells the same guy's book (2 co-authors, Gerald Musgrave and Devon Herrick) "Lives at Risk,"' - and now the basis for a monograph for the Cato Institute, "Health Care in a Free Society" - that asserts the US Way is more efficient, more equitable, and more affordable - despite the fact we pay 50% more as a percentage of GNP to cover only 85% of the population - perhaps cover 50% with good coverage - but facts never stopped CATO or Jeff Jacoby.

So Jacoby sells the fear of the "limit healthcare" - as if our insurance and pocketbook do not limit healthcare now - and the "wait lists" - as if the ER's now do not now refuse to treat various non-critical problems.

Indeed non-critical - meaning "elective" -surgery folks in thos nasty national health countries face waits of 4 months for 25% of the surgery that they want!

Schocking!

In the US annual physicals must be booked 6 months to 9 months in advance in most areas - but Jacoby is upset by the Fraser Institute of Vancouver report that the average Canadian patient waited 8.3 weeks for an appointment with a specialist in 2003 -- and another 9.5 weeks before getting treated.

I loved the colon canser wait in Britain causing 20% of the curable to become non-curable - since after you are found to have colon cancer the rate of "cure" is minimal, this is silly.

Then there is time spent with the patient - more than 20 minutes or less - can we say that US practice requires 10 times the paper work because of all the laws/regulations needed in a private insurance world - those extra minutes in the US are not always "quality minutes".

Indeed efficiency is in Jacoby's world a bad - the average US doctor sees 2,222 patients annually, the average Canadian doctor sees 3,143 - and no mention of any results study that indicates the American lives longer or has less child deaths - or - right - our results suck compared to those national health countries.

But we do buy the best equipement in the US - much more than any given area needs is purchased in our "competitive" system. Our folks push kidney dialysis, anf Jeff quotes the fact we get five times the coronary bypasses performed in Canada - but what about "results" as in longer life - why Jacoby is again silent.

If Americans really have a better chance of beating a condition -- such as prostate cancer, renal failure, or heart disease -- that would kill them elsewhere - why does this not show uo in our longevity?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Once again, the South and Texas
drag down the longevity statistics.

Many of the original settlers to this part of the country were the product of literally thousands of years of in-breeding, which continued to an extent even in the backcountry of the colonial U.S. (Remember the jokes about Arkansas siblings and the like.)

An uncle who was a doctor around here called this having PPP (piss-poor protoplasm). Couple that with what I would call an "anti-health" food diet (google the 'Four Southern Food Groups') and you have a recipe for disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "thousands of years of inbreeding"?
So--they were already inbred when they got here?

Of course, you've chosen to live in East Texas. Houston is geographically close to that fetid, mosquito & KKK infested swamp but worlds away demographically. We've got a diverse population here; Houston ain't Vidor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. 'Albion's Seed'
by historian David Hackett Fischer is my source. He divides the U.S. into four distinct cultures. Ours is ruled by the mentality of the Scots-Irish 'borderers' (so named because they were nomadic herders who lived in the lawless border region between Scotland and England).

These folk are the MOST VIOLENT by far of any of the four cultures in the U.S. They were constantly raiding each others' herds or fending off rustlers and there was no "law" in that region to impose civilized norms upon them. The leadership of our military historically has belonged to this culture.

I say thousands of years because when your family never moves beyond a confined territory such as that (no youth went off to college in those days, of course), how could you be anything other than somewhat inbred (even if not spawned by procreating siblings)?

Well, I didn't so much choose to live here as not to live elsewhere. I am a native of the region. Although I've been to Houston a number of times, I've never been to Vidor. That's how big even East Texas is. I think the Vidorites would call me a "North Texan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. If healthcare is one-seventh of US economy....?
then something needs to be changed.....Will it still be OK when it's half of the US economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MollyStark Donating Member (816 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. How much does he think can be put on a bumper sticker?
picky picky picky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Hi MollyStark!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Bush Doctrine
"When promoting radical change, passion and good intentions are what matter most. Real-world consequences count for far less."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. "earnestness, certitude, and indignation"
Like maybe the Schiavo case?
What a drooling fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC