Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is just Wrong

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:43 PM
Original message
This is just Wrong
First off, these are not public airwaves, they are privately owned and subscribed to. Second, the Supreme Court already ruled on this in 2000.

Last night on Tweety's show, McCain (what a sell-out, I wonder what they have on him) wouldn't even admit he thought it was over the line, Tweety asked him if he watched the Soprano's to which he said yes, and Tweety says, don't you think this would ruin it? McCain while shaking his head yes, was saying well, I want to look at the proposal, these writers should hold themselves to a certain level of decency, blah, blah, blah.....





GOP pols target indecency on cable TV

March 2, 2005

BY GENARO C. ARMAS Advertisement


WASHINGTON -- Indecency guidelines that over-the-air broadcasters must follow should be extended to cover cable and satellite broadcasters, congressional Republicans who are influential on telecommunications issues said Tuesday.

<snip>

''In this country, there has to be some standards of decency,'' said Stevens, who said he would push for such legislation

<snip>

The National Cable and Telecommunications Association, a trade group, said people choose to pay for channels and, as part of their subscription, are able to block programming they don't want seen in their homes. Because of that, the group said, any legislation would face an uphill battle in court.

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, voiced support for the idea of indecency guidelines for cable and satellite.

more http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-cable02.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guckert Donating Member (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. They have no problem with Fox programming on free television??
What a bunch of losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kypper Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ain't it funny?
Edited on Wed Mar-02-05 01:47 PM by kypper
Soon you won't even get the programming if you pay for it.
Yet another example of taking responsibility of the parent away and replacing it with rose-coloured glasses to put on your child before you sit him/her in front of the TV for good family values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hate speech is accepted--onother DU thread talking of O'Lielly calling
Churchill a traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Tony Soprano
Just imagine Tony Soprano saying, "Oh, gosh darn, fudge? ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. the bluenoses regret the loss of the Hays office
You know, those official busybodies who decreed that actors playing married couples on TV and in film had to use twin beds, along with other idiocies. Those of us who grew up with this stuff thought it was wierd.

The only upside of the Hays Office was that they managed to spur a huge boom in linguistic creativity to get the point across in music, film and television. Revisit such "scandalous" songs of the '50s like "Work with me, Annie." The more oblique references were hilarious. The bluenoses, too stupid to get it, loved things like "Jumpin' Jack Flash" in the late 60s. If anyone had ever told them what that meant, they'd have banned it instantly.

I've never particularly enjoyed sex as a spectator sport, but I don't see how banning the now obligatory sex scene in every movie would be an advantage to anyone. It's the perfect time to hit the snack bar or rest room for those of us who are bored by such stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horushawk Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. This why I don't watch R rated movies on regular TV
it's cut too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC