Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'How Social Security Might Change' great overview article from the WSJ.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 06:04 PM
Original message
'How Social Security Might Change' great overview article from the WSJ.
How Social Security Might Change

By JACKIE CALMES
January 30, 2005

Through two election campaigns, voters have heard President Bush call for fixing Social Security by letting them carve out personal retirement accounts. Now many are surprised to learn that such accounts aren't a solution by themselves -- not without future benefit reductions, more payroll taxes, or both.

What exactly are the other changes that might be made to Social Security?

That is the question administration officials have only just begun addressing as Mr. Bush works with Congress to hash out the devilish details for averting Social Security's projected insolvency before midcentury. Officials say he may suggest more details Wednesday in his State of the Union address, though no one expects him to be specific about a comprehensive plan until late February, if then.

To date, Mr. Bush has just offered "principles" for legislation. Chief among them: His demand that it must allow workers to divert some of their Social Security payroll taxes to personal accounts, in hopes of earning higher returns on investments. But less well advertised is that, in return, workers would forfeit some traditional benefits when they retire. Even with that, private accounts not only wouldn't restore Social Security's 75-year solvency, they would add to its immediate shortfall: Taxes diverted to workers' own accounts would have to be made up somehow, to pay today's retirees.

<more>

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/0,,SB110703449985340148,00.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. one thing this and most articles on SS don't mention.private accounts make
SS more regressive. Since the money you would put in would be only your own, the poor on SS would get less then now, and the rich would get more. Funny how Bush's policies always work out that way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Private accounts also eliminate survivor and disability benefits.
I guess the assholes at the Wall Street Pravda cannot wait for the poor farms to reopen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC