Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean Braces for Criticism in Dem Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 05:44 AM
Original message
Dean Braces for Criticism in Dem Debate
Democratic presidential candidates enter the fall campaign with a new front-runner, Howard Dean and eight contenders seeking to slow his monentum.

"I think there will be some fireworks," said New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat who
has not taken sides in the nine-way fight for the party's nomination.

H said Dems would be better off if candidates focus their ire on President Bush,
not each other, but he held out little hope for that.

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20030904_180.html

more........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. They'll be zeroing in on Dean
Keep it together, Howard - and focus on the real opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Top dog ALWAYS draws the heat
it comes with the territory. We'll see if Howard's got what it takes.
I suspect all his recent flip flops won't make it easier. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know he has backed off on the Cuba thing
Has he changed his footing on anything else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. what's the retirement age again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. vis a vis Mr. Dean: A non-issue.
Been answered. Long buried. Fair-minded people saw it as a nit-picking quibble from the start.

If you must carp, don't try to beat Mr. Dean with eight year old statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Really? How about with a one-month-old statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Which was compared to an eight year old statement.
Anyway, this has always been a non-issue. Harping on this makes people look like political mosquitoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. wow, what a credible
criticism! Not.

Sad to see us eat our own.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. can someone answer the question?
Puh-lease! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Here's what the Social Security Admin says:
http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ageincrease.htm

Full retirement age (also called "normal retirement age") has been 65 for many years. However, beginning with people born in 1938 or later, that age will gradually increase until it reaches 67 for people born after 1959. The 1983 Social Security Amendments, signed by President Reagan, included a provision for raising the retirement age beginning with persons born in 1938 or later. The Congress cited improvements in the health of older people and increases in average life expectancy as primary reasons for increasing the normal retirement age.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. This:
Edited on Thu Sep-04-03 09:11 AM by RUMMYisFROSTED
MR. RUSSERT: In ’96 you told The Globe you would look at raising the retirement age. You—no?
SEN. KERRY: I would not—I said that was one of many options that were out there that people would put on the table. Back then we were talking about putting everything on the table. I would not do that, period.



Edit: add link http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/960385.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Thanks for the firm answer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. So what?
I admire a politician who can change their mind and evolve. At least they are trying to hone a policy rather than either covering all bases and committing to none- or stubbornly refusing to budge when they are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. What's that war resolution again Kerry?
Edited on Thu Sep-04-03 08:30 AM by Ripley
Oh you "said" you were only for UN approval but gave Bush a blank check. Oh yeah.

Nobody died when Dean changed his mind (or clarified his position), but how many have died since Kerry and his fellow Congress buddies got bamboozled by the Bush/Cheney "truth tellers"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Dean gave an excellent reply to Judy Woodruff...
...concerning altering his stand on Cuba or anything else:

"I'm not ashamed to change positions that I have if the facts dictate that they ought to be changed. The hallmark of this administration is, if you have a fact that contradicts your theory, you throw the fact out. I'm a doctor. I don't throw out facts, I throw out theories."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Should he change his position on the middle-class portion of taxcut ?
I hope he re-considers and agrees with Kerry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hey2370 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Dean's not taking it away for nothing in return
He is promising basic universal health for the price to all taxpayers of returning the bribe that Bush gave us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. great quote
"I don't throw out facts, I throw out theories" Dean's the man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Clinton
faced the same when he was running. let's keep the big bullets for the REAL enemy-Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. I'll buy into that!
Go Dean go!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. Why can't Howard's supporters answer a question?

This is a campaign and people want answers. Do you think people should vote for your man without knowing what he supports?

It IS an issue when any candidate says he would "entertain" the idea of raising the Social Security retirement age. Now, I'm well aware that, after denying that he favored raising the retirement age, Dean admitted the next day that he had "misspoken" when he made that denial.

But what is his stand now? Does he favor leaving it as it is (meaning it's at 67 for some)? Or would he favor rolling it back to 65, as Kucinich does? And will he pledge not to raise it?

If any of you know for sure where Howard stand on this, how about sharing the info?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. *****
Edited on Thu Sep-04-03 09:17 AM by RUMMYisFROSTED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. So we should make Kucinich's PRO-LIFE voting record an issue too, right?
Edited on Thu Sep-04-03 11:19 AM by Sean Reynolds
This is a campaign, right? Shouldn't they all have the answers? Do you think people should vote for DK without knowing he was a pro-lifer?

I think it's an issue; I guess since you think something Dean said 8 years ago is an issue, this must be too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. i seriously doubt you'll find Dean making a "pledge"
about anything -- partly because he's NOT a panderer, and partly because he's smart enough to know that you cannot tell what the future will bring. Even *I* wouldn't say, for example, "No pre-emptive attacks ever," which someone or other tried to do to him not long ago. He won't say anything about the retirement age re SS, either -- or at least that's my bet.

For the most part, I like DK's politics. What I don't like about them are how unrealistic they can be. Pie in the sky, some of them: ending NAFTA, single-payer health insurance, and in all probability -- at least given the foreseeable future -- a SS retirement age of 65. You can promise ANYthing, if you know that it'll never happen anyway. I don't know if that's DK's intent, but if not, his lack of good judgment about realistic policies saddens me.

I also take exception to the notion, an underlying premise of your post, that a politician must lay out a position and stick with it forever more.

Dean has never "favored" raising the SS retirement age, at least not how I use and understand the term. He has said, back in 1995 I think it was, that that might need to be considered. Back then he used the age of as high as 70, IIRC. He has said more recently that there might come a time when raising the retirement age might be necessary -- which is NOT "favoring" or "supporting" -- and that what he'd vastly prefer if something needs to be done is raise the salary cap which is now at $86,000+.

Dean most certainly IS a straight talker. But that includes several things that apparently don't work for you. It means sometimes he's likely to say "I don't know," or "I haven't made up my mind," or "It depends," or even, "I've changed my mind."

He changed his mind slightly on Cuba -- as a result of NEW facts and dvelopments. He is still in favor of lifting trade embargoes, but he wouldn't do it right now, which would seem like rewarding Cuba for cracking down on dissidents.

Now, some of you call this waffling. I don't. I consider this approach to policies and governing mature, thoughtful, pragmatic, and sensible. I call it principled, as well, and courageous since he's not going to let the media and other detractors dictate the terms of debate and force him into positions, or into sticking with simplistic or outdated positions that are no longer appropriate.

Eloriel

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Retirement age is a "Dead Horse"...
65, 67, 76, hut one, hut two, it doesn't make a damn bit of diference WHERE it winds up at since a LOT of people's investments went far enough down the toilet that they will NEVER retire.

I'm one of them.
I could still retire at 65 (born in '57) but can I AFFORD to?
THAT is the question. Right now, the answer is "NO!"

Now if you kids wanna quibble about who said 65 and who said 67, go RIGHT AHEAD.
While you're fighting, be sure to wave at Jowly Joe while he cruises by into the nomination to give it all back to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. Attack Dean and his #'s go up!! Ignore Dean and his #'s go up!!
Go figure.

Dean '04...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PAMod Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Amen.
Maybe the rest will understand by convention time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. Much as I hate to see him attacked, it has to happen.
You know for damned sure the Bushies will hit him with everything they've got, so we need to know that Dean can take it. From what I've seen, he can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Good Dean I/P quotes:

snip>
His position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict might cause some problems in the Jewish community, a key Democratic constituency. Dean told the crowd there are an "enormous number" of Israeli settlements that must go.

"It's not our place to take sides" in the conflict, he said.
end snip>

I'm encouraged to see this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. wierd..
guess he changed his mind :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinnypriv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Nice
:thumbsup: !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I think he is bullshiting
I hope not, but that wasn't his position not too long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnapologeticLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. I am going to be so nervous
And I am mad because I have to work and can't watch it until later...the College Dems are having a debate watching party and I can't go :(. But in some ways I guess it is better...I can find out how it went first. This is a big night for Dean, and I really hope it goes okay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Foes target Dean in first big debate - MSGOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC