Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Planning For After The War In Iraq Non-Existent (Bush Is Toast)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 08:59 PM
Original message
Planning For After The War In Iraq Non-Existent (Bush Is Toast)
Edited on Sat Oct-16-04 09:01 PM by cryingshame
Thanks to fellow DU'er Troublemaker for spotting this.
By WARREN P. STROBEL and JOHN WALCOTT

Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - In March 2003, days before the start of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, American war planners and intelligence officials met at Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina to review the Bush administration's plans to oust Saddam Hussein and implant democracy in Iraq.


Near the end of his presentation, an Army lieutenant colonel who was giving a briefing showed a slide describing the Pentagon's plans for rebuilding Iraq after the war, known in the planners' parlance as Phase 4-C. He was uncomfortable with his material - and for good reason.


The slide said: "To Be Provided."


A Knight Ridder review of the administration's Iraq policy and decisions has found that it invaded Iraq without a comprehensive plan in place to secure and rebuild the country. The administration also failed to provide some 100,000 additional U.S. troops that American military commanders originally wanted to help restore order and reconstruct a country shattered by war, a brutal dictatorship and economic sanctions.


In fact, some senior Pentagon officials had thought they could bring most American soldiers home from Iraq by September 2003. ........

"We didn't go in with a plan. We went in with a theory," said a veteran State Department officer who was directly involved in Iraq policy.

snip

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/9927782.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is not just a shame
It is a crime! Arrest Bush and all the rest of those fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anger and heartbreak.
Those are the two most significant feelings I have when I read this.

Of course, the only thing that's new about this is the number of agencies and groups that warned Rumsfeld, shrub, Cheyney, etc. of what was going to happen.

I pray that after Kerry takes office, there is a full congressional investigation of these failures and that Rumsfeld, Feith, Perle, Cheney, Rice, Bush and others are prosecuted as war criminals.

The blood of 1,000 soldiers is on their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. The worst thing is these fools STILL think everything they did was perfect
"Central Command originally proposed a force of 380,000 to attack and occupy Iraq. Rumsfeld's opening bid was about 40,000, "a division-plus," said three senior military officials who participated in the discussions. Bush and his top advisers finally approved the 250,000 troops the commanders requested to launch the invasion. But the additional troops that the military wanted to secure Iraq after Saddam's regime fell were either delayed or never sent."

----------------

Hats off to these reporters for a GREAT article!

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Duplicate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=910128



To avoid duplicates:
Read the Latest Breaking News forum first before posting. Look for high count threads for obvious stories that have a lot of interest and that have been posted previously.
Do a search of a just a few keywords. Running just the title sometimes does not bring up results.
If you don't have the search option because you don't donate, consider donating, or look on the right column of the latest page. Scan the column for posts made in the last day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC