|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:10 PM Original message |
Bill O’Reilly's viewers are actually less educated than (Jon) Stewart's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:11 PM Original message |
Let's get to work on the Bill O'Lielly Crow Cookbook.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. According the Annenberg, Daily Show viewers are best informed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kysrsoze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 03:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
57. They're all just intellectual, snooty stoners who can't speak plainly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
6th Borough (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-29-04 01:04 AM Response to Reply #57 |
70. The answer would of course be Jon Stewart :) EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not one bit surprising... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark0rama (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 07:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. True, there is not a thinking person in this country... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. Now thats the poll that matters and is quite obvious!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
4. My husband and I are no stoned slackers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. i would watch o'reilly for a guaranteed million |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibeMatt (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
60. I would definitely take the million... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. We're stoned, but not slackers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. for a million dollars?? i'd hold my nose and watch but I never miss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. A million is a lot of money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
24. I'm a "stoned slacker" - but also a college grad and a media professional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
6th Borough (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-29-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #4 |
71. Hell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. O'Reilly was everything he claims liberals are in that interview |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. republicans always accuse of what they just did. funny, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannylib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 06:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
64. That's been their 'strategery' from the get-go. * waffles on everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colgate (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 12:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. O'Reilly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorba607 (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
56. WHAT!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 05:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Check this out!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. yeh thunk? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMarple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. Oh, really! Let O'Reilly have his little illusion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. When will O'Reilly learn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldenOldie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. O'Reilly is a Corporate welfare hog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 10:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
46. 10 mil? That means O'Liely gets paid about a million |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogtag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. Fans of O'Lielly, Rush, Hannity, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
13. Well.... DUH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjdee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. Did someone email this story to O'Reilly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Bloode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
15. I can't wait.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. oh this is hiLarious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. We knew that . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 08:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. Anyone with a brain would not suffer the abuse that O'Reilly dishes out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vox_Reason (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. This story from the department of the utterly unsurprising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
childslibrarian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Not only am I not stoned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. Freakshow o'lielly Leaves him- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
26. Shame about O'Reilly, thinks he's so smart, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. O'Reilly's definition of intelligence is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 08:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. They weren't applied to the appropriate part of the body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. Is anyone really surprised at this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
29. "Life is a tragedy for people who feel, and a comedy for people who think" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joefree1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hee hee hee. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
31. Well duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
33. What a shock! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
34. HA HA, HA HA HA HA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
35. Fox viewers are proud of their idiocy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. Nielsen: Stoned Slackers Brighter Than Drunk Crackers! My Poem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fameless (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
39. Anyone have video of Jon on "The Factor" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatlingforme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 09:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. When was he on? I did not see that but I would love to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Squeegee (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
40. Funny, I never smoked pot and I am a work-aholic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtime (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
42. they ACTUALLY are? ACTUALLY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
43. IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hyphenate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
44. Hoo hah!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RevCheesehead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-04 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
45. DUH!!!!!!! This is news - to whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
48. Ha ha ha ha ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
49. not fair to O'Reilly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
llmart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
50. This coupled with the earlier survey....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagickMuffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
51. Big Surprise (Not) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
52. I'm a physician, my IQ is 138-152 (depending on the test), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. Smartass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
53. You don't have to be too bright to figure this out. So I guess Comedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
54. U have 2 B informed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
55. And a whole lot angrier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IA_Seth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
59. He, he...I am a stoned slacker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AgadorSparticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-29-04 12:56 AM Response to Reply #59 |
68. how can people not see the danger in stoned out slackers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
61. I would be curious to see the actual numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indie Media Magazine (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
62. O'Reilly listeners are a bunch of inbred imbeciles....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
65. Simple O'Reilly is less educated than Jon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Digit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-28-04 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
66. There's viewers and then there are discerning viewers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obiwan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-29-04 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
67. Apparently, excessive alcohol consumption by his viewers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AgadorSparticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-29-04 01:03 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. you got that right!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 05:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC