(Note: I am aware that the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette skews right, especially on its deplorable editorial page, but I think this article has value.)
Publication:Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; Date: 16 September 2004 ; Section:Front Section; Page:1
Kerry avowal of war horrors no issue in ’71
BY PAUL BARTON ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE
WASHINGTON — Only a small part of John Kerry’s now famous 1971 testimony before former Arkansas Sen. J. William Fulbright and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee dealt with atrocities in Vietnam, and those remarks prompted no questions from panel members, a transcript of the hearing shows.
Thirty-three years later, however, the remarks are at the center of a firestorm in the presidential campaign pitting Kerry against President Bush, with some veterans accusing the Massachusetts senator of having slandered all veterans in his testimony....
***
But some Vietnam scholars, as well as the spokesman for Vietnam Veterans of America, have come to Kerry’s defense. They say his remarks about atrocities are being twisted for political purposes....
***
Kerry’s two-hour testimony in 1971 covered a wide range of other Vietnam topics — from the special burdens on black soldiers to rampant drug use among troops to ideas on how to bring the conflict to an end "immediately and unilaterally."
He was interrupted frequently by applause, once causing Fulbright to interject: "I hope you won’t interrupt. He is making a very significant statement."...
***
(A Vietnam scholar and a former Fulbright aide said the atrocity comments "probably didn’t raise the eyebrows of Senate Foreign Relations Committee members because atrocities were already much in the news that spring" -- Lt. William Calley had been convicted just a few weeks earlier for the deaths of civilians at My Lai. The Committee would have found plausible what Kerry reported from soldiers' accounts.)
http://epaper.ardemgaz.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib:ArticleToMail&Type=text/html&Path=ArDemocrat/2004/09/16&ID=Ar00105