Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran Test Fires New Version of Ballistic Shahab-3 Missile

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:40 AM
Original message
Iran Test Fires New Version of Ballistic Shahab-3 Missile
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 11:42 AM by papau
So will the Israeli/US developed Arrow anti-ballistic missile system take out the Shahab-3's threat?

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBE7I2MRXD.html

Iran Test Fires New Version of Ballistic Shahab-3 Missile

By Ali Akbar Dareini Associated Press Writer
Published: Aug 11, 2004

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran on Wednesday test fired a new version of its ballistic Shahab-3 missile, which was already capable of reaching U.S. forces in the Middle East and has since been upgraded in response to Israeli missile development.

The Shahab-3, which Iran last successfully tested in 2002 before providing it to the elite Revolutionary Guards, is the country's longest-range ballistic missile, with a range of about 810 miles.

It has since been modified to improve its range and accuracy. Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani said last week that the modifications were in response to efforts by Israel to improve its own missiles.

<snip>
The Iranian missile, whose name "Shahab" means shooting star in Farsi, can reach Israel and several other countries in the region (and their US Bases), fanning fears in the Jewish state that Tehran may strike it. <snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interception
So will the Israeli/US developed Arrow anti-ballistic missile system take out the Shahab-3's threat?

Not likely. Interceptor missiles are a notoriously hard thing to pull off. The only reasonably effective way to do it is for the interceptor to be nuclear-tipped. That way, not only does the interceptor not have to hit the IRBM/ICBM head on, but it only needs to get close. There are, however, other roadblocks, such as it never having been done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Israelis have serious reservations about the effectiveness
of the Arrow system.

They deployed it, but they are not claiming that it will provide an effective defense against longer ranged ballistic missiles like the Shahab-3...

(sort of like the multi-billion dollar untested White-Elephant BDM system ChimpCo deployed in Alaska this summer).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not surprised.
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 01:34 PM by TheWraith
Ballistic missile interception is kind of like having someone throw a rock at you, and you trying to hit it with another rock in mid-air. Success depends on sheer luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Maybe Boosh could politely ask the Iranians to put transponders...
in the missiles.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloodyjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. great
Iran, after all, has always had the right to defend itself, hasn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes. I can't blame them for wanting to protect themselves.
Considering our military is next door, and Israel stupidly keeps making threats against them, it's no wonder they want to arm themselves as a deterrent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. where exactly do you "test" these things?
I mean, how would you really know how far it could go and how accurate it could be unless you aimed it at something across your borders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC