Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Less Than Meets the Eye? U.S. Gvt. Sting Operation Criticized as Set up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
donotpassgo Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:40 PM
Original message
Less Than Meets the Eye? U.S. Gvt. Sting Operation Criticized as Set up
By Brian Ross
Aug. 13— Administration officials are leaving out key facts and exaggerating the significance of the alleged plot to smuggle a shoulder-launched missile into the United States, law enforcement officials told ABCNEWS. They say there's a lot less than meets the eye.

snip

He, on many occasions, in recorded conversations, referred to Americans as 'bastards' Osama bin Laden as a hero," said Christie.

But what he did not say was just how much of the alleged missile plot was a government setup from start to finish.

For example, Lakhani had no contacts in Russia to buy the missiles before the sting and had no known criminal record for arms dealing, officials told ABCNEWS.

link: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/missile030813_sting.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QuietStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ah yes a setup

or a training exercise?

"'I would have hoped the United States is thwarting real terrorism and not something manufactured because here all they're doing is stopping something they created,' said Lefcourt."

So much for hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. at least they stopped their self-made terror, this time!
the bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. i saw this report
ross said the whole plan might not have happened at all if not for the US govt's "skilled choreography"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QuietStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes but that they stopped

kind of gave them away. As soon as we invaded Iraq terror warnings stabalized. If you remember at one point when a bit of noise surfaced in regard to Iran being a threat, and it's ties to Al Qaeda, video threats emerged briefly with threat of terrorist retaliation, yet the terror alerts remained stabalized. It was so obvious they were playing those terror alerts to keep all on edge in their desire for popular approval to invade. Then nothing. It must be they have a clue people are on to them. It seems to me this is the only reason they haven't preemptively struck Iran yet, because of the rising contraversy in regard to the trumped up justifications with Iraq. Uraniumgate kind of fouls things up for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pax Argent Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. I think you're right
but I think that 2004 was already planned to be a light year for military conquests, as our troops are all tied up in Iraq and Bush has to keep things as light and airy as possible so that folks can forget that they've been screwed. Fear has served its part (for the time being) although I look forward to the PNAC plan resuming in 2005.


Now is the time to tie up loose ends in preparation for the election.
Remember, the perception now has to be that things are better if they're going to get re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Entrapment ...
... and a sting have a fine line that is easily crossed.

Entrapment is the conception and planning of an offense by an officer, and his procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery, persuasion, or fraud of the officers.

Supreme Court's legal definition of entrapment in the 1932 case of Sorrells vs. United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wwagsthedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Entrapment
is how we're waging the "war on drugs" also. Be very afraid!
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. That was before the Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. The blurb yesterday about these guys targeting Air Force I
grew NO legs with the press as it was obviously a Karl Rove invention to prop up the FI's weak numbers. The press saw through that one. Now they're questioning the legitimacy of this bust! It's pretty bad when even the mainstream press questions stuff like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. An increasing number of Americans would have regarded it
...as wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. Do you know
Where that Air Force I crap came from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. It reminded me of all the big drug busts they used to do
and then have press conferences about with DEA and FBI. That's immediately what it reminded me of. It's a diversion from something else, probably the military families screaming about this stinking war.

This is old news anyway. Most people believe TWA 800 was brought down by one of these and Al Martin's been talking about this stuff for years.

But I did find an interesting story on this Halliburton guy who's up on federal charges for stockpiling 2,000+ missiles and the judge is keeping Cheney's name out of it. Gee, ya think he might have been selling some of them?

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_2780.shtml

It's six degrees of Adnan Khashoggi again:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. To Call This A 'Set-Up' Is Mild
It seems this foolish fellow dealt with no one who was not a government agent during this whole affair. He may well have had the will, but certainly lacked any means to act on it on his own hook.

Surely anti-aircraft missiles of suitable character can be had from those the U. S. government itself supplied to mujahideen in Afghanistan, hundreds of which are unaccounted for to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mal Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. According to Janes.com
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 09:54 PM by Mal
conservative estimates are at least 100 stingers unaccounted for (out of 900 supplied).
Janes has some interesting information, including that while stingers are really good, they are also really expensive ($250,000!) and stocks 'in the wild' are limited, as opposed to the SA-7 (a soviet era missile), not too good (distressing tendency to shoot at the sun), but could be picked up for as little as $5000, and there may be tens of thousands out there, no-one actually knows.

"Missile Smokescreen in Moscow"
http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jid/jid030813_1_n.shtml

"Proliferation of MANPADS and the threat to civil aviation"
nb : MANPADS - MAN Portable Air Defense Systems
http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jtic/jtic030813_1_n.shtml

(so now lets see if I've worked these links correctly...)
Edit - trying to get it right...
Edit - And again...
Edit - Will you bloody work?!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ah hah!!!!.....Wag the Dog!!!......Once again!!!
What the hell does the WH think we are?

A bunch of dumb ass bozos?

Their ploys are blatantly evudent and you always know one is coming
especially when their polls are dropping steeply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. In answer
What the hell does the WH think we are?

A bunch of dumb ass bozos?


Actually, they're counting on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. CNN whores at it again
Aaron's got Michael Isikoff on, and the screen text propaganda is: BUSTED STING? Was a bigger operation compromised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. He was probably set up in order to test Poindexter's terrorist market
but when the deal fell through, they busted him for the headline's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. why do they get involved in these embarrassing situations?
isn't the administration learning anything from the results of it's incessantly manipulative approach to reality? can't it find a way to fine-tune this stuff so it doesn't backfire on them in such a short period? the amount of time between an announcement by the bush administration or the FBI or CIA and the time that it backfires on them is getting shorter, exponentially. pretty soon, the embarrassing details will be heard before the event even takes place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Setting up Christie to run against McGreevey, or for senate?
Why else would Ashcroft and intel give such a plum to New Jersey's US attorney? You heard it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. this missle
did they give him a working missle ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. According to the reports, no.
And they were going to target Air Force One? Not that again. This truly is the administration that cried wolf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC