Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats to 'verify' purge of voter rolls (Florida)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:40 AM
Original message
Democrats to 'verify' purge of voter rolls (Florida)
By Robert Perez | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted May 22, 2004

Florida has begun another purge of felons from its voter rolls, and state Democratic leaders want no glitches that could stop law-abiding citizens from voting.

So they're going to double-check the state's work.

The Florida Democratic Party on Friday asked for all public records relating to how the state Division of Elections developed its list of nearly 50,000 "potential felons," which was transmitted to the state's 67 election supervisors last week.

"We want to have public records available so we can verify the list," said Scott Maddox, Florida Democratic Party chairman. "It's the old 'trust but verify.' After 2000, there's not much trust, so all that's left is to verify."

more: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/elections/orl-locfelon22052204may22,1,6580191.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, Thankfully They're Capable of Learning
Edited on Mon May-24-04 08:42 AM by Beetwasher
What happens when they find out that thousands of eligible voters have been purged? Can they get them back on the rolls in time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KuroKensaki Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have no trust either..
Not even for the Democrats here. I live in Florida, and NOBODY made a big enough deal about the tens of thousands of purged voters. All we got was an NAACP lawsuit.

Tell you what--get Greg Palast to check over the list after the state Democrats have done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. and from what i had heard and read,
during the 2000 selection, florida's selection supervisor, theresa lepore, was a republican in democratic's clothing. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KuroKensaki Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's bad?
Katherine Harris was simultaneously Florida's Secretary of State and the chairwoman of Bush*'s election campaign!!

And nobody saw a conflict of interest in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. yes, and 'hairass' was rewarded
with a position in the u.s. house of representatives. many of us saw a conflict of interest,
however the bushes are a powerful lot. it really :hurts: !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Theresa Lepore is the election supervisor for Palm Beach County
not for the entire state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. yes, and she was the creator of
the infamous 'butterfly ballot' which, all by itself, could very easilly have cost gore the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think that she was just stupid, not necessarily corrupt
Unfortunately the Republicans have a monopoly on neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. not to belabor the point,
but what i read about her was that she was republican, came from a republican family, and, for some reason, had to be a democrat to secure that particular position, so she switched.
she was either dumb or dumb-as-a-fox, and i could go either way, :) sooo i'll go your way :hi:!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Corrupt and deliberately dumb
She also took home voting machine cards for the new machines back when it was not a story that such cards could be easily copied and altered.

Just because no one holds you to account does not mean that you are NOT a crook, but with a huge lineup of smoking guns as she has at the very least someone should investigate and suspend her as election commissioner. She seems to me exactly to a "t" the clone of Kathleen Harris when it comes to voting.

And as self destructive as a purge can get I am increasingly suspicious that she is not the only doubtful Democrat bungling away the store to the GOP and hamstringing the party in Florida(or elsewhere).

Such people should never at the very least be entrusted with high responsibilities and leadership due to their shadowy action and inaction in their duties. Or plain stupidity, does it matter?

Of course what is frustrating is the spectrum of the "doofus-I- wanna-be-like-the-GOP-surrender-monkeys" to the Zell Miller sellouts and paid trolls. A deep purge would eliminate a chunk of the top leadership of the DLC just as a matter of course. THEY seem to understand this instinctively and their response?

Threaten the party like Bayh did. Another reaction typical of people caught with their pants down. This is a radical swing to the left, to fight for the integrity of our elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. The Supervisor of Elections is elected as a nonpartisan position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. ;) sooo, we have nothing to worry about! ;)
snip
"Theresa LePore, the person responsible for the infamous "butterfly ballot" as Palm Beach Supervisor of elections, switches party affiliation BACK to 'Independent.' Le Pore was never a real Democrat, and only switched to the Democratic Party affiliation to win the office. Republicans who said the butterfly ballot was made by a Democrat were wrong. This revives an old question: 'Was the ballot design intentional?'"
snip

http://www.legitgov.org/linksPbuddies.html (halfway down)

snip
"The folks at Democrats.com had their "Don't let the door hit you on the way out" response at the ready. 'Back in November, we all wondered how the butterfly ballot, which just seemed intentionally fixed to throw the race to the GOP, could have been designed by a Democrat! We were confused a bit suspicious. Now the other shoe has dropped! Ballot designer Theresa LePore has come out of the closet and officially declared herself a Republican! She belonged to the party in the 70s, then switched to Independent, then to Dem in 1996 just when the GOP really started playing dirty. She says she switched back to the GOP because the Dems were mean to her. Well, Theresa, maybe it's because nobody likes a double agent!'"
snip

http://dir.salon.com/politics/red/2001/05/09/blue/index.html (1/4 down)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoggera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. list of nearly 50,000 "potential felons,"
Isn't everyone a "potential felon?"

The use of the language these days is fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Bushco should not cast one vote

In my mind they are felons!

These Repthugs are getting "two for one" because they know the huge majority of "felons" are democrats/African American!

This makes me so mad when a kid is labeled without fair representation and Ken Lay is walking around free as a bird. He should be a JAIL BIRD!

And.... Bushco can kill thousands and they can vote!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Good grief, did every ex-con move to Florida.
That is a very large number of "potential felons."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. *LOL* I'll have to keep that observation in my "counter-point" list. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does anyone know what the NAACP is doing about this?
I think they settled their lawsuit. The agreement was to clean up the voting rolls? This latest purge seems to violate the settlement. I'm basing this on my memory of the settlement.

Does anyone have any information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. My understanding was that the final settlement involved correcting
the last purge - which was not corrected (I believe) by 2002. I have periodically looked to see if that was done - and haven't found anything one way or the other.

Perhaps they reinstated everyone (to correct the problems?) and are starting over? I, too, would be very interested in the Fla. NAACP's take on a) the compliance to the settlement; and b) how this current action does or does not fit with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. There is still a case running
To overturn Florida's laws that prevent felons who have finished their probation or parole requirememts from voting. Republicans are trying to stall it, as well as prevent it from reaching the U.S. Supreme Court level, as if the Supremes deem it to be unconstitutional (as several state courts have) Then every state still left with such laws on the book will have to repeal such laws.

Repules are stalling it in FLorida, keeping it from getting to the Florida Supreme Court, because the Florida Court will almost immediately boot it to the Supreme Court. They are trying to get it dealt with at the state level, so that at this point, it will effect no other state, but they are trying to stall it, so that nothing happens during this electoral cycle. TheACLU is trying to push it so that it is overturned just before the election, and in enough time for those effected by it to be able to register in time for the November vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. Nothing new on the NAACP's website
yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You are correct sir
And Jebco has dragged and dragged it out through the 2002 election and intends to drag it out past the 2004 election.
He is in contept as far as I can see and someone should drag him back into court and slap an injuction against him and threaten him with jail time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. They Say it will be 2006 Before All Wrongfully-Purged Are Back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. A little more info
My local NPR station had a report on this new purge. A couple county election supervisors indicated they had found significant problems already. One said they won't be hurried this time but others indicated there won't be time to check all the names before November.

I don't have a link because I have no idea which show this was on. I wasn't paying much attention until I realized what they were discussing. :-(

Thanks all for more info on the NAACP lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Okay, but has the 2000 purge been corrected yet???
Last I heard--couple of months ago--they still hadn't reinstated the people mistakenly purged from the last go-round. Be kinda nice if they fixed that, too, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Of what value is the suit if the NAACP doesn't follow through and get the
innocent registered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gee, I feel so much better now.
Making a list and checking it twice....gonna find out who's naughty or nice....


Paging Tavis Smiley! Paging Tavis Smiley! Disenfranchisement in progress!

Time to organize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
26. There's gonna be a fight over this! BushCo is banking on this!
Tom Delay brownshirts are no doubt being called into readying positions! Get ready to rumble, folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC