Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Steps Up Hunt in Leaks to Iraqi Exile

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:13 PM
Original message
U.S. Steps Up Hunt in Leaks to Iraqi Exile
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/24/politics/24CHAL.html?ex=1085976000&?en=dd7efb6cc7d0e282&?ei=5062&?partner=GOOGLE

WASHINGTON, May 23 — The information that Ahmad Chalabi, the Iraqi exile leader, is believed to have passed to Iran was so highly classified that federal investigators have intensified their inquiry to find out whether anyone in the American government gave the material to Mr. Chalabi, government officials said Sunday.

Federal investigators now suspect that Mr. Chalabi funneled a wide array of Pentagon and C.I.A. secrets to Iran — much more material than they believe he might have obtained through his political contacts with Americans, they said. "This was not the kind of stuff that he would have gotten by accident," one official said.

Intelligence officials have said the investigation centers on a handful of officials in Washington and Iraq who dealt regularly with Mr. Chalabi, and an even smaller number who also had access to the compromised information. Most of them are at the Pentagon, which was Mr. Chalabi's main point of contact with the Bush administration.

<snip>

While Mr. Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress received about $40 million in the last four years from the State Department and Defense Intelligence Agency, the C.I.A. cut its ties to him in the 1990's after concluding that his group was unreliable.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! Am I reading this right?
"Intelligence officials have said the investigation centers on a handful of officials in Washington and Iraq who dealt regularly with Mr. Chalabi, and an even smaller number who also had access to the compromised information. Most of them are at the Pentagon, which was Mr. Chalabi's main point of contact with the Bush administration."

Could this mean Rummy, Wolf, etc??? Oh, I hope so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or perhaps it was an act of Feith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yes, I'd say Feith is the odds-on favorite in this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, they'll track down this leak
Right after they bring in Osama, find the anthrax killer, figure out the Valerie Plame affair . . . Say, what do think DU? Could this gang of Keystone Kops could find their own ass with both hands and a flashlight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. So who will win the war?
The Neo-Cons at Rumsfeld's O.S.P., or the CIA?
I'm routing for the CIA. They have not forgotten what was done to Agent Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
5.  Federal espionage statutes prohibit
anyone from knowingly passing classified information to a foreign power..

This is from the article above. If this is true how did Bush get away with showing the Saudi Ambassador the Iraq war plans before even the State Department had seen them????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's Feith. It's gotta be Feith.
That guy is at the center of every fuckup and screwup that the Maladministration has perpetrated in this whole Iraq adventure.

It has to be Feith. I'd bet a thousand bucks on it.

Read this if you haven't already:

Douglas Feith
What has the Pentagon's third man done wrong? Everything.
By Chris Suellentrop
http://slate.msn.com/id/2100899/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think you're absolutely right. He is so crazed that there isn't anything
that he wouldn't stoop to, even treason IMHO. But I don't for one minute think that there aren't a couple of more of those nasty critters involved. Wolfie and/or Perle aren't out of the question if you ask me.

In a rational, sane, legitimate United States, this would be enough to bring a whole administration down. And it should. bush* is so clueless and out-of-touch with reality and the everyday events of his administration, he should be held just as responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I love this quote from Tommy Franks:
Franks calls Feith "the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. another blow to the cia.
Edited on Sun May-23-04 10:30 PM by rchsod
how much damaged has been done? iran could go either way and now we might not have the intell on what is happening untill it`s to late. if all this is true- how much damage has bush really done to the security of this country? i guess we will know in the future,won`t we...
this link was reported several months ago and nobody in the press believed it ,the only sources were internet reports...
isn`t it strange to be "on the side" of the cia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. I say Cheney, Wolfie and Feith are the leakers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Although I rarely believe anything I read these days,...
Edited on Mon May-24-04 10:15 AM by Just Me
,...oh, how I want to believe that this investigation will reach full fruition 'cause ya' just KNOW it will lead to the neocon cabal:

Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Libby and that whole lot of despots!!!

And, if the investigation reveals that these folks shared ANY classified info with Chalabi,...they are in such deep caa caa,...a freakin' bulldozer couldn't dig 'em out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. er... what is wrong with the first paragraph?
Did that jump out at anyone else???

Excuse me... but the question should be whether or not he passed on information and if it was highly classified - and if he did WHO gave it to him... not "did someone give it to him"... er... IF he had it to pass on - someone HAD to give it to him - OR there is some security flaw that enabled him to get it. If it is as highly classified as alleged (yesterday it was referred to as so highly classified that few high officials even had access to it).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. We own Iraq...is that still considered a foreign country?
in the minds of the thugs in the pentagon...they were sharing information with their brothers in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not The Clearest
Statement.
".....is believed to have passed.."
Interpret this that they believe he passed on the information. Means that he had the information.

"...whether anyone in the American government gave the ..."
We know he had the info, now did someone give it to him. Well if they didn't give it to him then he must of stolen it.

Not a very clear statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Of course someone gave it to him and it had to be someone high up
The suspect list should be short. I am betting on Wolfie but Chaney would not surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC