Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman Advocates Smaller Government

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:40 AM
Original message
Lieberman Advocates Smaller Government

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Joe Lieberman says Democrats need to be staking out stronger stands on national security and shy away from advocating more big government.

"Some Democrats ... still prefer the old, big government solutions to our problems," the Connecticut senator said Monday in a speech to the National Press Club. "But, my friends, with record deficits, a stalled economy and Social Security in danger, we can't afford that."

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-democrats-lieberman,0,5361767.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

I know there's been a few other articles about Joe, but each new statement strikes me as a bit more incredulous. No health care plan from him, I guess. Or is this just an all purpose swipe by cliche?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. How come "small government" never applies to the Pentagon
and the arms merchants?

Holy Joe has adopted the language of Ronald Reagan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's so convoluted, this struggle for language
DLC "new dems" are morphing into old repubs. What the media calls the left is really centrist. You just know that the larger voting public will be using old definitions. It's all smoke and mirrors.

It is hard to recognize Joe as a dem at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Joe's advocating everything and anything he can
Ahhh, the rank smell of desperation, coupled with Bush-worship.

Lieberman is a sad, one-note joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lieberman Advocates Smaller Government
So does George W. Bush*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Caption: Yes, *that's* the size it should be! Mwa ha ha
Edited on Tue Aug-05-03 10:51 AM by party_line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. For God's sake, why doesn't the man
just get it over with and switch to the repukes already, he already is one anyway! All he cares about are guns and military might, and that infuriates me. God help us if he ends up the nominee! Who would he select as his running mate, Trent Lott?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnabelLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. What neocon talking point
will Lieberman adopt next?:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Sorry, but this is a New Democrat talking point
At least it was when Bill Clinton and Al Gore talked about shrinking the size of government.

I understand that many of the posters around here are probably a little too young to remember the 1992 and 1996 campaigns, and that many others are suffering from short-term memory problems. But still, I'm having trouble understanding why it's ok for Clinton and Gore to say these things, but when Lieberman does he's branded a right-winger, a neocon, Bush light, etc. Hypocrisy thy name is DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Joe needs to heed the words of Harry S Truman -
who once said, "Give the people a choice between a Republican and a Republican, and they will vote for the Republican every time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. I advocate smaller government...
in the form of one less Senator....the Most Righteous and Holy Joe Lieberman from CT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. When I read
crap like this I'm reminded of this DU thread. What do you guys think?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=110&topic_id=378

DU poster DagmarK

Corporate Takeover of US Govt: Mirrors the Kiwis from late 80s

***I ran across an interesting few posts in a Guardian talk group in the international forum under a thread entitled Calling All Americans VIII.

There is a chap (or lassie?) named mmuskin who is posting some important notes from a thread on DU from mid-October. I think we ALL need to read it. So I copy it here. (or the parts that mmuskin has already posted thus far).

This info is written by a New Zealander, and I wonder if that person is still posting here? I would SURE like to talk to him/her! The similarities in NZ’s handling of the corporate takeover of THEIR govt in the late 80s and what we see here are ASTOUNDING! And, to be fair to the dems (esp GBNC!) who say they will NOT vote for any bushlite dem even if that bushlite got the nomination, well……after reading about how NZ eradicated their cancerous corporate takeover, I tend to agree. It’s time we got radical and cleaned house in our govt and do it NOW. Not just elect some dems to do it for us sometime after Nov 2004!

To be fair, mmuskin lists some of the responders as: in a thread started by hedda_foil. Other posters' names included Mr_SmokesTooMuch, NewYorkerFromMass, jiacinto, ithacan, nothingshocksmeanymore, charlie, KoKo01, NYC, TahitiNut, bornskeptic, StlMo, Armstead, Classical_Liberal, Tinoire, WhoDoYouTrust, Merlin, TheSocialist2002, Tigermoose, LiberalLibra, BeHereNow, Pocho, Tigerlily, David Zephyr, and bpilgrim. I wish I knew who the (New Zealander) author was but I saved the entire thread and am only now attempting to render it readable from the saved HTML.

The most chilling quote in the WHOLE thing is this one, which I excerpted:

“So my only connection to the US is the knowledge that the US is the most powerful nation on the planet, and if these corporates get control of its military then we will ALL be screwed.”

BY MMUSKIN on Guardian Talk:

The preceeding four posts are quotes from the talkboards of DemocraticUnderground.com (DU, not to be confused with Depleted Uranium) posted late last year. Many people found them interesting, as did I. I will post more from my collection of those posts as I get time.

Notes from the (Democratic) Underground, Part 1

Sit back, and really think about it; and while you're at it, think about the Clinton presidency too (i.e. Welfare "Reform", NAFTA, WTO, for starters). Here in New Zealand in the late eighties, our left-wing party, Labour, underwent the same right-wing transformation that has taken a hold in the US and the UK. Privatisation, union busting and all the rest of the typically right-wing policies subtly became the policies of Labour and much damage was done because of it.

Most of our national industries that provided tens of thousands of jobs, and much needed revenue for the government, were mismanaged and run into the ground, before being sold off at fire-sale prices to overseas corporations.

We were told that by selling these loss-making enterprises, the government would be able to reduce our national debt considerably, and that they would be run better and be cheaper for the public. What we got, was basically enough money to cover a few years interest repayments on the debt, and huge amounts of revenue lost overseas, revenue that could not only have covered those few years of interest payments, but many more years, and we would still own our assets.

Legislation was also brought in that basically killed the unions. It gave far too much power to the corporate employers, while taking power away from their employees. Unemployment skyrocketed, and although it eventually stabilised, it still remains relatively high, and real wages came down significantly, so much so, that people earning over US $16,000 per year are considered wealthy.

Now comes the part that most of the pro-Dem posters would probably NOT like to hear: The people in our Labour party who brought about these changes, have since admitted that they were basically right-wing plants all along. As far as we can tell, those people in the Labour party were matched by similar people in the National party (the right-wing party) so that at that time, no matter who we voted for, these changes would have occured.

Those crypto-rightists in the Labour party eventually broke away to form a new party called the Association of Consumers and Taxpayers (ACT) which is a misnomer. They are in fact the most right-wing pro-Corporate party in New Zealand, they are in fact more right-wing than the right-wing National party of today. </snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Joe must go
He's done.

Over.


outta here.
See ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. He advocates smaller government because we can't afford
larger government because he voted for Bush's tax cuts. Huh. Well, each step is logical. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. Bullshit! Not all Democrats are for big government!
Social programs do not equate big government! Holy shit! FUCKING ASSHOLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Right. And we should let the Enron type crowd run things?
You want to see disaster? Privatize everything and create poverty, eleminate the middle class, and create an aristocracy of parasites that can feed off the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. Leiberman
I wonder what his definition of "old, big goverment" is? If it is helping the citizens of this country prosper what is his beef? I am tired of the terms big government, small government. It is government period. If the government can't help the population what use is it? I thought that was the reason we had a government. What we have now is not government--it is I've got mine, to hell with you. Taking care of our own has always been the bright spot in this country and a reason to be proud. I guess I never really "knew" Leiberman. He did not voice these points when he was running with Gore, or if he did it was so subtle it sure escaped me. We have to get rid of this administration for sure. The slide from sanity to greed and deviousness has happened in a short 2-1/2 years and when we reach bottom there doesn't seem to be much hope left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blecht Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. If there was any doubt that Lieberman was a Republican ...
... these statements remove it.

Can we Democrats do anything about kicking him out of our party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenwow Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. Traitor!
Shouldn't the party kick him out? He's against everything the party stands for, so why not? Could you get any more hateful Lieberman? Talking about taking helpful programs away from those that need it isn't going to get us votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good "moderate Republican"
I think Lieberman is pretty much your Rockefeller Republican. Nothing strange here. He should spend more time critiquing WHY the economy is stalled and there are massive deficits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. Lieberman: lighting the way to 17th century Salem!
How can the party ever hope to win with this joyless theocratic scold, this pro-war corporate stooge?

Not only should he lose the nomination, but it's time for concerned Dems to take back the party and replace him in the Senate. The era of the right-wing Democrat must end!

http://www.joseph2004.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. When will Holy Joe give up and switch to the GOP?
Yes, it would make it more difficult for Dems to take control of the Senate, but it would sure be easier on Democrats otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. You mean like Clinton and Gore did?
Edited on Tue Aug-05-03 01:44 PM by dolstein
After all, it was Clinton who declared that the era of big government was over, and boasted that size of the federal government actually shrunk during his administration. And it was Gore who preached about the need to reinvent government, making it leaner and more effective.

But hey, you're probably one of those DU'ers (and there are plenty 'em out there) who never much cared for the Clinton/Gore administration, so I can certainly understand why you'd attack Lieberman for embracing the message that won us the popular vote in three consecutive elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Lean and efficient is good
But continuing to hack away at govt can only go so far, then you're down to SS and medicare.

Since the Pentagon is the most inefficient (how many billions can't they accout for?), why doesn't he attack that instead of other members of his party?

The problem I have with Joe, in this case, is the use of an old repub cliche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sujan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. yes
follow bush model of misadministration. Good for Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Comadreja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Smaller government is fine...
As long as corporate power is reduced even smaller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SideshowScott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Does Lieberbman REALLY think hes going to get the DEM nom????
Geze every time he opens his yap he sounds like every other Rebublican Politican or Talking Head..I mean Joe WON on a left democratic ticket with Gore..Im a die hard dem but i think the Lieberman nom is the only one that MIGHT make me vote Green beacuse he DOES NOT represent the majority of the Dems..I can see and support reaching out to all parts of our political spectrum but Lieberman is on the Bush mindset where he cateres to the right and tells the left to kiss off..That does not represent my views not one iota..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC