Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Liberals risk minority status, poll shows - Environics Cdn Poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 05:41 PM
Original message
Liberals risk minority status, poll shows - Environics Cdn Poll
Liberals - 39%
CPC - 29%
NDP - 19%
Bloc 11%

http://erg.environics.net/news/default.asp?aID=549

Good news for the NDP and, to a lesser extent the Liberals I would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. It must be nice to have political choices. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And to have a right-wing party outnumbered 70-30 by the left and centre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I expect that result has a lot to do with having choices.
We'll see how the third parties do this time around. It seems
clear we aren't going to get to cast an anti-war vote unless we
risk re-electing Shrub, which is how they rig the system. Reminds
me of 1968 and Humphrey "running" against Nixon after they
managed to sidetrack McCarthy and the anti-war movement of that
day. You have McCarthy = Dean, Shrub = Nixon, and Kerry = Humphrey
and the match is pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You disregard the fact that the RW killed Bobby
in 1968. He would have beat Nixon hands down. If you're implying some kind of a conspiracy to not let anyone vote on the war then blame the RW for killing Bobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. There ain't no "Bobby" this year.
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 06:17 PM by bemildred
The comparison only goes as far as the three guys I mentioned.
I thought about '72, but Kerry doesn't match up with McGovern at
all, much as the Repubs might like to pretend so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsAreBack Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Bobby was running in Canada?
When was this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's the great thing about a threadjacking.
You can never be sure what bizarre turns it'll take. It's art!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Renaissance Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. the numbers don't mean too much
The conservatives always poll highly prior to an election, but always shit themselves in the campaign.

Stephen Harper is a complete crank, he also has a totally abbraisve personality.

Last election, when they ran a freak named Stockwell Day, they polled veryy highly, till it came out that Stockwell Day is a Flat Earth creationist.

Stephen Harper also supports the war in Iraq and would send Canadian troops to Iraq, that will be REAL popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Actually, this is a good poll.
If the CPC can't top the Liberals now, when can they ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Great sig. quote. I see eugenics everywhere these days.
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 07:31 PM by JohnOneillsMemory
It's my vocabulary word for the century to go along with 'fascism' and 'Dominionism.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Exactly!
I suspect the Liberals will get a bare minimum majority when it is all said and done. I have been watching the hearings on the sponsorship scandal and the partisanship on all sides has been ridiculous. The Alliance (faux Conservative) Party will not get many more votes than they did before the takeover, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Conservative support is down, I think, 12%
from the aggregate of the PC and Alliance vote in 2000. The "united right" process was a joke - a hostile takeover by the far right - and moderate PCers aren't taken in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. How is it that Canada has so many parties?
Don't you guys have a 1st-past-the-post electoral system? You're not proportional rep. are you??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We used to have more. It's strictly first past the post (for now)
We have -
Conservatives (Right)
Liberals (Centre)
Bloc Quebecois (Centre-Left, Quebec Nationalist)
New Democrats (Left)
Greens (?)

We had, until last year Progressive Conservatives, some of whom still remain unofficially

These are the main parties, any how. All the above except Greens are represented in Parliament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. So these parties must have pockets of regional strength?
I was always taught that a 1stPP electoral system eventually forced a system with two big centrist parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The CPC is essentially Western and the BQ Quebec based.
The Greens have more strength in BC, Liberals and NDP are more evenly spread across Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks for the ongoing lessons on Canadian politics!
They are much appreciated!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. I trust Environics most of all.
Ipsos Reid, I believe, is paid by the Green Party to include it as an option, artificially inflating its support. "Other," here, is down to 3%. Where I would expect it.

Regional breakdown:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. We're getting close to a repeat of 1988 in BC, and the GTA figures
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 09:38 PM by Screaming Lord Byron
are deadly. The Liberals are haemoraging (can never spell that work).
Insider tip I received recently - watch Hamilton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. At these numbers and with this breakdown,
I'm estimating 42 seats. How about you?

And the Conservatives are taking a real hit in BC. Are they going to make up those loses in Ontario?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'll go with this.
We take The Yukon back, we take four seats on Vancouver Island, six in the Vancouver area, two more inland, one of the two possible Edmonton seats, six in Saskatchewan, five in Manitoba, 12 in Ontario, 1 in NB, PEI and NF each, five in Nova Scotia. Forty-five seats off the top of my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. We who?
It's not in the NDP's best interest to split the left in Edmonton West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I don't see that.
I suppose the left vote may tend to vote strategically in Alberta more than anywhere else, given the size of the Conservative base. But why is it in the NDP's best interest to defer to the Liberals, in Edmonton West or anywhere? It would subvert the party's central theme this election, that Martin represents a conservative option, and that disaffected small-l Liberals may find more of their values reflected by the NDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. because the seat is too close to call at the best of times
Anne is quite left-wing. small-l liberals would do better with her than split the left and lose the seat to Freeper-wannabes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Our interests are in Edmonton East and Strathcona, TrogL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. We could look at voting blocks this way:
Liberal: 39%
Socialist/Progressive (NDP, Bloc, Green): 32%
Conservative: 29%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Our Greens are weird. Their leader is an ex-PCer.
They're not as left as the Scottish Green Party, who are definitely socialist, I don't see what the value of the Canadian Greens is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. And Layton talks and walks the environment.
The Green Party doesn't have much room, or reason, to grow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. As long as the Conservatives don't get in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. Dang, if only it were like that here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC