Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Says Iraq Sovereignty Could Be Limited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:17 PM
Original message
White House Says Iraq Sovereignty Could Be Limited
WASHINGTON, April 22 — The Bush administration's plans for a new caretaker government in Iraq would place severe limits on its sovereignty, including only partial command over its armed forces and no authority to enact new laws, administration officials said Thursday.

These restrictions to the plan negotiated with Lakhdar Brahimi, the special United Nations envoy, were presented in detail for the first time by top administration officials at Congressional hearings this week, culminating in long and intense questioning on Thursday at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's hearing on the goal of returning Iraq to self-rule on June 30.

Only 10 weeks from the scheduled transfer of sovereignty, the administration is still not sure exactly who will govern in Baghdad, or precisely how they will be selected. A week ago, President Bush agreed to a recommendation by Mr. Brahimi to dismantle the existing Iraqi Governing Council, which was handpicked by the United States, and to replace it with a caretaker government whose makeup is to be decided next month.

That government would stay in power until elections could be held, beginning next year.

The administration's plans seem likely to face objections on several fronts. Several European and United Nations diplomats have said in interviews that they do not think the United Nations will approve a Security Council resolution sought by Washington that handcuffs the new Iraq government in its authority over its own armed forces, let alone foreign forces on its soil.

more…
http://nytimes.com/2004/04/23/politics/23DIPL.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Imagine my surprise!
Their's too, I'll bet!

The tragedy is, the current casualty numbers will continue for a long time. What a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. IRAQ-NAM
And the beat goes on. The SHEEP who love their Christian leaders, Cheney, Asscrap et al, believe Democracy is achieved see CNN/USA Today polls

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
44. The Iraqis know and understand this. That's why they keep fighting us.
Only our stupid populace doesn't understand what is going on. They have all had Limbaugh-otomies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sistani said a couple of months ago that he expected the US forces to
leave after June 30. The story got no airtime but we may be hearing from him again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. And THIS is why Spain and others are leaving Iraq.
They're not willing to support this charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
35. Oh we will
absolutely be hearing from him again. This is going to make NO one happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeteC Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. partial sovereignty?
what the hell is partial sovereignty?


sovereignty:
Supremacy of authority or rule as exercised by a sovereign or sovereign state.
Royal rank, authority, or power.
Complete independence and self-government.
A territory existing as an independent state.

What should it be called?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veggie Meathead Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It is like being slightly pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. its a way for Bush to pretend he held his commitment
without actually doing so.

"Let's not and say we did"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
42. That's like China saying Tibet has "limited sovereignty".
Typical abuse of language by an occupying military force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mokito Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
46. What should it be called?
somevereignty ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow..shocked I tell ya!

next thing you know, they will be teling us that they are planning to pump oil into Israel or something! LOL!

What was that? Oh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. i.e. circa 1950's Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Romania
That's about how much sovereignty they will have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. delete
Edited on Thu Apr-22-04 10:24 PM by bluestateguy
delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Iraqafornia..new state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. sino -- sovereignty in name only
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ya think?????
Just because we'll have 150,000 troops stationed there and appoint their government ourselves?

Hard to imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. See related article I just posted in the new WMW....
Bush's 'Transit of Power' Gambit----Asia Times Online...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veggie Meathead Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Get ready for the coronation of the bank robber,
Ahmad Chalabi, as the new Shah of Iraq. With his approval,it will be a veritable feast for the pigs at the oil trough in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
39. Feast for Pig Halliburton at US public Tax Trough
Feast for all Mercenaries at the public trough for Bilgewater Industries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is surreal
If I were not watching this daily, I would never believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Some good stuff in here
Mr. Grossman, however, referred in testimony on Wednesday to what he said would be "limited sovereignty," a phrase he did not repeat on Thursday, apparently because it raised eyebrows among those not expecting the administration to acknowledge that the sovereignty would be less than full-fledged.

(snip)

European and United Nations diplomats said that because the main task of the caretaker government would be to try to secure the support of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the Iraqi Shiite leader whose supporters are unhappy with some of the laws enacted by the Iraqi Governing Council, there may have to be a change in these laws.

Under the basic legal framework pressed by Mr. Bremer, Islam is only one of many foundations of the law. Ayatollah Sistani's supporters want Islam to govern such matters as family law, divorce and women's rights. Mr. Bremer had at one time threatened to veto any such changes, but even some administration officials acknowledge that the idea of telling the new Iraqi government it cannot enact new laws is unrealistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. no shit???!

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Democracy in action....you may only be a democracy as long as you
give all your resources to US corporations and allow us to kill you whenever we get the urge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Iraq is in Foreclosure
Bush couldn't make the payments because he never had a plan.

He is in no position to tell the new landlords what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think we should give them all ballots
and let those millions vote Bush out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bremer has already passed laws paving the way for foreign
companies to move in and grab most of Iraq's assets. This way Iraq will be powerless to stop this from happening.

Do they really think the Iraqis will fall for this. "Operation Enduring Stupidity" rides on into the sunset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Ummmm...
Edited on Thu Apr-22-04 11:37 PM by Tellurian
"Do they really think the Iraqis will fall for this."

No, I don't. Bush is puffing up his end because he is dealing from weakness. He should have waited until an offer was on the table.

Now, he is forced to make concessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
37. And "*Jerry"
will assuredly bug out of Iraq while the ink is still wet on that little "Status of Forces Agreement" whoever they install will sign. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. Surprise, surprise...
...NOT!

"Only 10 weeks from the scheduled transfer of sovereignty, the administration is still not sure exactly who will govern in Baghdad, or precisely how they will be selected."

This is the point that struck me most when Bush spoke about it recently -- "we, er, don't know exactly, er, what entity we will be handing power to, but, er, we'll be handing over power on June 30, yup, we shure will!" (paraphrasing). And it strikes me even more now. 10 weeks from handover, and we don't know who in the h*** we're handing "sovereignty" to?!?!?

Gimme a break! Tell me I'm not dreaming! This is insane!

Of course, if it's all a charade anyway -- which, of course, it is -- then, no need to get worked up about what "entity" we're "handing power to". Doesn't matter, we know who's really running the show.

At least that seems to be the theory. Unfortunately, the Iraqis are not going along with the script right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uhhuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Sure we do
"10 weeks from handover, and we don't know who in the h*** we're handing "sovereignty" to?!?!?"

We are handing over Iraq to Negroponte.

See? It's different because he wasn't in charge before. So we handed over power.(insert smirk here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. There is no such thing as limited sovereignty. You either are a sovereign
country or your not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. Just build a wall and call it 'Gaza Grande'
I saw this coming a mile away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. LOL
Sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drscm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Hey, they're goin' to giv'em the keys to the outhouse
in the servant's quarters. You really did not expect them to give them their freedom, didja?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
26. Iraq will be a Satrap ....
An Oil Satrap for harsh, jaded men in Texas .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. Did anyone really think
for one minute that Bush, Cheney, etc will let go of Iraq? The people will have to pry Iraq from their col, oil stained grubby little fingers. All this talk about allowing the UN in, is just that, election talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
28. Iraqis are not stupid this is as transparent...
as anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unbrand Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. "Guided sovereignty"
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 01:29 AM by unbrand
Shrub or Condi will say "Well, you know, Iraq isn't really in a position to have FULL sovereignty, so it must be guided by the U.S. Of course, once elections are held, they will then have FULL sovereignty."

Watch for it....

(edited for clarity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
31. More of this over the next few months and you'll find that Sistani
and the Ayatollahs will start agreeing that Sadr has a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
32. Limited as W's IQ
I don't think the Iraqis will be dancing in the streets when they
recieve this gift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. another puppet government
not surprised...

considering that there is no plan, no "course", no road map -- this is the best they can come up with in order to give the appearance of making the june 30 deadline

If you don't know where you are going, you won't know where you are when you get there.... -- me 6/2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. EXACTLY
bush and cheney are not about to surrender their ill gotten oil to ANYONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
40. It's all about being able to sign legal contracts.
They can't legally rape the country without the facade of a government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
43. partiaL democracy for the brownskins
i can't beLieve their ingratitude. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
45. It's election year "sovereignty"
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 08:03 AM by Jim__
There is no such thing as limited sovereignty. Think our ever vigilant media will pick up on this? Where's George Orwell when we need him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
47. Could we make it anymore difficult for the UN to accomplish anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
48. and there it is
shrub believes in democrasy for iraq the way he has protected it at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
49. shrub kind of, sort of, believes in democracy
maybe, sometimes

not really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC