Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ATF: Illegal to Sell Guns to Med Marijuana Users

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:28 PM
Original message
ATF: Illegal to Sell Guns to Med Marijuana Users
Source: ABCNews.com

By MATT VOLZ Associated Press
HELENA, Mont. September 28, 2011 (AP)


Firearms dealers in states that allow medical marijuana can't sell guns or
ammunition to registered users of the drug, a policy that marijuana and
gun-rights groups say denies Second Amendment rights to individuals who
are following state law.

Federal law already makes it illegal for someone to possess a gun if he or
she is "an unlawful user of, or addicted to" marijuana or other controlled
substances. A Sept. 21 letter from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives, issued in response to numerous inquiries from gun dealers,
clarifies that medical marijuana patients are included in that definition.

"There are no exceptions in federal law for marijuana purportedly used for
medicinal purposes, even if such use is sanctioned by state law," said the
letter by Arthur Herbert, the ATF's assistant director for enforcement
programs and services.

Federal firearm licensees, or FFLs, can't sell a gun to someone who answers
"yes" when a required form asks whether the buyer is a controlled substance user.
Last week's letter also says that licensed dealers can't sell a gun or ammunition
if they have "reasonable cause to believe" the buyer is using a controlled substance.



Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/atf-illegal-sell-guns-med-marijuana-users-14626488
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, its not illegal.
Until due process is completed and a person convicted of a felony, all Constitutional Rights remain in full effect.

Someone is gonna get paid handsomely via a lawsuit on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Not quite. The issue at hand is the background check on firearm sales.
Every transaction which goes through a dealer, there's a background check, which includes a list of questions. One of those is "Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana, or any depressant, stimulant, or narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?"

According to federal law, medical marijuana use is illegal. So any MM patients would be considered "illegal users" of marijuana, and therefore fail the background check, at least according to the ATF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. So they intend grower patients to face home invasions without a gun?
And every bad guy will know that it is unlikely to face resistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. Yeah, because growers are known for their adherence to laws.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prospero1 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let me get this straight....
in order to exercise one's 2nd amendment rights one must give up one's 5th amendment rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burf Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the same ATF
that is running guns to the drug cartels in Mexico?

Just another of the things that make a person go Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
43. Yes because if med cannabis users have guns, the ATF won't have enough guns to sell to the cartels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about this?
Get a DUI and lose your rights to own a firearm.

Quick death!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why is the government in my medical records?
How is that legal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wait 'til you see what's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. I'd be fine with that.
If someone can't use a 1-ton weapon responsibly, I'm not going to trust them with a different weapon. Give 'em a year to get therapy, and try to clean up their lives, and see if they can avoid breaking laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. So using controlled substances...
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 08:35 PM by blackspade
invalidates the 2nd amendment?

So, anyone who is taking perscription medication is included?
They are, after all, taking a controlled substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. The ATF specifically singles out "unlawful users."
In other words, you can buy a gun while on hydrocodone, or anti-depressants that have suicide as a side effect, or mind-altering pharmaceuticals, as long as they're not considered "bad" drugs by the ATF. Meanwhile, light marijuana use for relief of pain or nausea is a no-no. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. No, you can buy a gun if you aren't *addicted, or using illegal drugs*.
"an unlawful user of, or addicted to".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Deoxyn is the trade name for meth.
Yes, that's right. Meth is sold as a legitimate, prescribed pharmaceutical for ADHD in both children and adults, for exogenous obesity, for narcolepsy, and one or two other conditions.

So, is the ATF restricting the right to bear arms for those who are prescribed Deoxyn?

Here's a better question. Why does meth have a legitimate pharmaceutical use, but cannabis does not?

Another great example of how utterly screwed up our drug policy is lies in the history of MDMA. That was used in a whole host of psychological therapies, from talk therapy during divorces to the treatment of PTSD in soldiers. Nonetheless, once people who dance to house music got hold of it, it was yanked, for the sin of making people who take it feel good. Of course, that all by itself made the drug more dangerous, to the point that you don't know, today, what's in that little pill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GReedDiamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. That's not quite right...
...it's Desoxyn®.

Whatever you do, do NOT forget to include the Registered Trademark symbol (or the "s")!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #20
35. "Why does meth have a legitimate pharmaceutical use, but cannabis does not?"
Dosages, purity, and control.

Same thing with MDMA, and marijuana derived drugs.

Pure versions of specific chemical compounds are legal, street drugs are not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol is legal, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. r2z
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does this apply to other prescription medications as well?
Just what definition of "controlled substance" are they going by here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Here's the ATF's own definition.
http://www.atf.gov/careers/drug-policy.html

Looks to me like this rules out gun ownership for ten million people being treated for ADD, just for starters.

We live in a country well on its way to becoming a police state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. On its way? Do you do standup?
Having just returned from Europe, I can assure you that, as demonstrated by U.S. air travel procedures, we are already there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. Have anything useful to add to my comment, or were you just using it as a fire hydrant? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. The federal government does not recognize any medical purpose for marijuana.
Therefore any state prescription is automatically null/nonexistent to the fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DreamSmoker Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Land of Laws is righteous and wrong(((AGAIN)))
When Cannabis is concerned... What the Hell is the difference from the ATF and the DEA??????????...
Not Much...
America is a Land of Laws... Does not make anything right though..
American History proves that over and over again..
Cannabis is now at the top of this issues...
Science has proved this Government has lied to the hilt to back its stand that Cannabis has no Medical Value..
The DEA has recently Stated this again.. Even when the Horse has left the Barn and Science has showed this Governments true Colors...
Lying Bastards who will arrest confiscate or even Kill you for possessing Cannabis...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Get thee to thy local gun show
MedMar shouldn't be much of a problem there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Only if you're going to wander around asking other attendees if they'll sell you a gun.
Despite "conventional wisdom," dealers are still required to do background checks on sales at gun shows.

And I doubt it would be lost on the other attendees that someone is wandering around asking to buy a private gun because they can't go to a dealer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Deltoid Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. They do not do background checks at gun shows
They have you fill out a little slip of paper promising you have no felonies on your record. That is all they do, at least at the shows I've bought guns at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Only from private sellers.
Any FFL holder MUST do a background check even if he or she is off-duty from the gun store they work at.

Just like people selling in the newspaper, or at a garage sale. If you aren't a gun store or a FFL holder at the gun show, you don't have to perform a background check. That's all.
No person that sells firearms for a living can do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Deltoid Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. True
Both times I bought guns at shows it was from private sellers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Federal law requires gun dealers to perform background checks on every sale.
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 10:58 PM by TheWraith
Whether they're at a gun show or not, whether they know the customer or not, whether they're even just selling one of their own weapons not through their business. There is no discretion or loopholes for FFL holders.

Now if that "little slip of paper" you're referring to is the Form 4473, well... that IS part of the background check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. How dare the ATF enforce the law as it is written!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. The ATF should be a convenience store
They should be enforcing the 2nd Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. A doctor's prescription =|= "an unlawful user of, or addicted to"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Federal law prohibits doctors from prescribing Schedule I Controlled Substances
Doctors are only 'recommending' that patients use medical marijuana. If they were to prescribe it, they would be violating federal law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. If only a democrat were in the White House /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Good, there's been far too much gun violence from medical marijuana users.
Far too much. It's all over the news, everywhere.

It's not like there are any other problems to be concerned about, right?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Deltoid Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. Open season on medical MJ patients
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yet it's A-OK to sell firearms to alcoholics...
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 10:53 PM by BiggJawn
Never met a "mean" pothead, I've met PLENTY of "mean drunks".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. That's why it's called the War On SOME Drugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. Wow. But Oxy users, people who drink, etc., no problem. But heaven forbid you use a natural medicine
horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. How hard can it be to get a gun
when we buy illegal weed all the time.

We are obviously criminals so we do what we must.

This veteran is pissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
40. While I do think the country would be better off if all guns were replaced with pot,
this seems like a mostly-for-show law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
42. Shut them down
Why is the ATF attacking the American people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retired af major Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
44. Just freakin wow ...
My government is really really out of touch. Its rules aren't serving the people of this country very well.

A listing on a government website-
Pharmacological and therapeutic secrets of plant and brain (endo)cannabinoids.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18777572

Here is, I shit you not, a Texas based NYSE listed corporation (CBIS) being reported in a phama trade journal as doing medical business with its cannabis based products-
Guidance For Cannabis Science Brand Products To Be Released October 2011 In Colorado Based On Accumulating Anecdotal Reports Of Successful Cancer Treatments With Cannabis Extracts
http://pharmalive.com/News/Index.cfm?articleid=804875

This is a link to a business trade journal reporting on the same company-
Cannabis Science: How it talks to shareholders
http://www.businessinsider.com/cannabis-science-how-it-talks-to-shareholders-2011-9

There are marketed and prescribed medications that contain the active ingredients in cannabis-
Sativex® is a cannabinoid medicine for the treatment of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis which is also in development in cancer pain and neuropathic pain of various origins...
http://www.gwpharm.com/Sativex.aspx

Same company, different treatable ailment-
GW signs Sativex cannabis-based drug deal with Novartis - GW Pharmaceuticals has signed up Swiss drug group Novartis to sell its cannabis-based multiple sclerosis drug, in a significant breakthrough for the British company that sent its shares up more than 12pc.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/pharmaceuticalsandchemicals/8443914/GW-signs-Sativex-cannabis-based-drug-deal-with-Novartis.html

The website of the American Cancer Society
The most reliable cancer treatment information - Marajuana
http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/ComplementaryandAlternativeMedicine/HerbsVitaminsandMinerals/marijuana

Government website, "We the People" We Petition the Obama Administration to:
Legalize and Regulate Marijuana in a Manner Similar to Alcohol.
https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/legalize-and-regulate-marijuana-manner-similar-alcohol/y8l45gb1

Wondering outloud if the NRA would support destruction of this barrier to exercise of 2nd Amendment rights? Cancer patients can't practice their hobbies or defend themselves with tools other citizens are afforded?

One-quarter of the states have medical marajuana programs.
The prohibition of cannabis in the US created a monstorous criminal underworld in Mexico.
Government, this is the People, time to reconsider dumb policy.


Disclaimer: I own CBIS stock.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
45. Hmmm....
What about the 4 people that the US government still mails 300 joints a month to because of a lawsuit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ride4Life627 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
46. I'm hoping,
Reeeeally hoping that this is all a large showing as these Drug War agencies gasp for their last breaths of air. It was last week I heard about the DOJ potentially eliminating the ATF. A wounded lion is much more dangerous than a healthy lion...

Source: http://townhall.com/columnists/katiepavlich/2011/09/30/bombshell_doj_considering_elimination_of_atf/page/full/preview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
47. lol... ridiculous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC