Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Solyndra execs will decline to testify at hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 02:40 PM
Original message
Solyndra execs will decline to testify at hearing
Source: Reuters

Solyndra LLC's chief executive and chief financial officer will invoke their Fifth Amendment rights and decline to answer any questions put to them at a Congressional hearing on Friday, according to letters from their attorneys obtained by Reuters.

In the letters sent to the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, attorneys for Solyndra CEO Brian Harrison and CFO W. G. Stover said they advised their clients not to provide testimony during the hearings.

The bankrupt company's $535 million federal loan guarantee is being investigated by the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Harrison is represented by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and Stover is represented by Keker & Van Nest.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/20/us-solyndra-idUSTRE78J5RE20110920



Way to fight back against this anti-Obama witch hunt. Stick to your guns. That's how the Repubs would do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
larkrake Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush pushed this loan, it was all but signed when Obama came in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Signing is the key step - that is the decision making step
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. self delete
Edited on Tue Sep-20-11 09:24 PM by IamK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. In a just country, the next reporter that mentioned Solyndra would be publically whipped
We do not live in a just country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. People who don't honor Congress demand for testimony are supposted to have warrants out for their
arrests.  Why does Congress pretend it doesn't have the power
to force people to testify under oath?  What kind of a banana
republic are we when criminals can decide if they are going to
tell the truth or not?  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or when Rich People decide they don't want to pay taxes? Congress can place liens on property and
banks to collect tax revenue. Tax revenue is serious business.
 It is our bread and butter.  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. so I can put you down as a person in favour of repealing the US 5th Amendment?
:shrug:

Last time I checked, 'banana republics' do not have such constitutional protections.

Do not fear though, at the rate the USA is moving, you will not have them soon either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Congress can compel testimony when immunity is granted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The people ARE going to provide testimony.
Their testimony will be " I decline to answer that question under my right to avoid self incrimination:
this is a lawful statement, and legal for them to do.

It is people like to Rove who simply refused to appear at all that should have been arrested.
No warrant in his case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. none of this is good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why is this an issue? Businesses fail all the time, this one failed in an utterly ordinary manner..
Given the morals and integrity of the witch-hunters, the best strategy, I think, is to give them no information at all, but to make them work the legal system as hard as they can to get ANYTHING done.

But ultimately, we would nearly all benefit the most if it were simply dropped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. John Stewart.... Nothing to see here.. please move along...
Edited on Tue Sep-20-11 09:27 PM by IamK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Wow! That was a good one!
Nice work, Jon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
christx30 Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Most businesses
don't fail taking over $500 million in taxpayer dollars with them. Where did the money go? And why was this extreamly bad decision made? No one wants to buy solar panels. There is no way you'd be able to get your money back if you invested into the company. I wouldn't have invested. But I did, thanks to this decision by first the Bush mis-adminstration and now Obama. Now we're out over $500 million. And they want to raise our taxes. They have an obligation to use our money wisely. If they don't, they're not doing their jobs and should be voted out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I watched them build the buildings in the SF Bay area. Huge buildings.
The property and buildings could have cost 500 mil easy. I don't think Solyndra should be allowed to keep, and sell these buildings and property. the government should just... forclose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
christx30 Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Could not agree more
We're taking back our investment since your company won't exist soon. Then the feds can sell the property to pretty much anyone. They won't have any trouble selling it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Part of the sweetheart loan package is that the government is last in line behind private investors.
Nice, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
christx30 Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Whomever
wrote out the government's side of the contract needs to be investigates. Whether he/she worked for the Bush or Obama administration. I'm not blaming one of those guys. The president can't look at every contract that is written. But that person that did it needs to be looked at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC