Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Airport bag scan improper, S. African minister's office says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lars77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 02:11 AM
Original message
Airport bag scan improper, S. African minister's office says
Source: CNN

Officials in Norway insist that airport security operated properly in subjecting baggage belonging to South Africa's top diplomat to security checks earlier this month.

However, a spokesperson for Minister of Foreign Affairs Maite Nkoana-Mashabane claimed that Oslo airport security violated diplomatic immunity and that other nations' foreign ministers are not subjected to such intrusions.

Nkoana-Mashabane, reportedly angered by the incident, left Oslo on a chartered flight after refusing to allow airport security to scan her personal luggage on a commercial flight. She was in Norway on a state visit.

"She insisted on going around the metal detector instead of through it," Oslo airport's information manager, Jo Kobro, told CNN. "Everybody in Norway, including the prime minister, is subjected to security controls. The only people who are exempt are our king and heads of state."

Read more: http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/09/19/south.africa.diplomat.search/



The lady refused to have her handbag checked and was rejected. In stead of simply sending her bag through the scanner, she chartered a private jet. Now there´s a new way to spend your people´s tax money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lars77
Lars77

Wel Norway have rules, and rules is to be followed.. Diplomats is excempled from many local rules and laws, but Im pretty sure they are "encuraged" to go true a metal dedector anyway.. Even tho Im not sure about the luggage as it is often seen as "diplomatic property" and therefore legaly to not have excamened. Im not sure about the rules but Im pretty sure the Lady do had a legal right to refuse it to be controlled.. I think this is in the Geneva Conventions somewhere...

I guess both the inspectors and the Minister of Froregin Affairs should have tried to work this out in a way, where no one feathers was ruffed to mutch.. Both sides Could have managed this better I guess.. But when this is said, maybe the lady treated the customs in a way that make them go "she might have something to hide".. Not everybother in the forreign service treat employers at airports with the decency they deserve.. Some belive they are royals..

And as it is pointed out, even our prime minister is subjected to security controls.. Our King are not, but the rest is, and if our Prime minister ca go the metals decetor, then a mear Minister can go true the metal dedectors withouth complaiment..

And she had to spend a lot of money, on a private jet, to travel to South Africa from Norway.. That could not have been inexpensive to rent a private jet all the way.. But, oh wel, maybe Minister of Foreign Affairs in Soth Africa have a lot of more money than in Norway.. Or it can be that the South Africa government paid for it all..?

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Diplomats ARE above the law
It's supposed to be that way. If they act in a way contrary to a country's laws, the only recourse the guest country has is to decline their credentials and ask for a different diplomat to be sent. Once the guest country has accepted the diplomat's credentials, the diplomat is the King's representative and, as you say, you don't put the King through the body scanner. It's supposed to be up to the home country to select people that will represent them well and act in accordance with this assumption.

This extends even to bomb-carrying, dope-smuggling North Korean diplomats, who can't be prosecuted for carrying out Kim Jong-Il's schemes. Of course, if they are found out, instead of succeeding with their errand, Kim has another surprise waiting when they return home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. This was not a diplomatic pouch. This was her personal luggage.
I do believe the Norwegians have every right to do this. Correct me if I'm wrong. That said, what the heck was in that bag?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep. She was certainly hiding something more than a dildo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Probably carrying jars of pickled herring - more than 3oz each
Smuggling pickled herring would be my goal, from a visit to Norway.

One of my goals, anyway.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Better count the hotel towels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. How dare they examine a diplomats luggage like a mere commoner.
Tut tut and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC