Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Senator Carl) Levin: Bar efforts to coerce GM production of Volt in China

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 10:33 PM
Original message
(Senator Carl) Levin: Bar efforts to coerce GM production of Volt in China
Source: Detroit News

Last Updated: September 16. 2011 6:07PM
Levin: Bar efforts to coerce GM production of Volt in China
David Shepardson/ Detroit News Washington Bureau

Washington — U.S. Sen. Carl Levin wants the Obama administration to prevent China from "coercing" General Motors Co. and other American companies from turning over key technologies.

In a letter Friday, the Detroit Democrat asked U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk and Acting Commerce Secretary Rebecca Blank to intervene to prevent the transfer of U.S. technology.

China is offering consumer incentives of up to $19,000 to purchase vehicles like the extended range plug-in hybrid Chevrolet Volt — if the vehicles are assembled in China.

"The Chevrolet Volt represents intellectual property developed in the United States and paid for by General Motors research and development dollars," Levin wrote. "The U.S. government must not allow China to coerce American companies to give their technology away to their foreign competitors in order to have access to their markets."



Read more: http://detnews.com/article/20110916/AUTO01/109160416/Levin--Bar-efforts-to-coerce-GM-production-of-Volt-in-China#ixzz1YB1cOTA4



Free trade, my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. china will just steal it if they cannot coerce anybody nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left on green only Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny, I would have thought that someone would have made mention
about all of the jobs that moving production to China would take away from the American middle class workers. It seems like no one mentioned in this article could ever pretend to not be at fault for not being concerned about American workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Coast2020 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think we need to write to the trade official and tell them.....
"keep the friggin jobs here. Not China"!

Yes, they will steal the technology. Absolutely! Worked there for 4 years. Thats their MO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Isn't that strange?
No politician ever mentions the jobs leaving the country - as if it is not happening. Except of course Bernie Sanders does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Bernie Sanders is a real public servant. Integrity like that in a politician,
saying and doing what you really believe in, even if it may cost your your seat. Not even in my distant memory bank.

I am in awe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left on green only Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Poor choice of wording. I meant "funny" in a figurative sense only
The reality is that it is actually a tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Reducing Chinese CO2 emissions is of greater importance
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 02:02 AM by wuushew
I feel the cost benefit analysis favors the transfer of technology. If others disagree feel free to chime in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadtotheboneBob Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. I'm OK, of course, with reducing Chinese CO2 emissions...
... but, let them buy the cars here and ship them there. There's this 'balance of trade' thing and UAW jobs to consider, ya know? There's a small GM Power Train plant here (Bay City, MI) that was selected to produce special engine parts for the Volt. I do NOT want those jobs going to China!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Are US taxpayers subsidzing production of a green(er) car in China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good for Senator Levin
A senator who is actually (gasp!) trying to stand up for America and American jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. Stabenow: China violating trade rules by pressuring GM to share Chevy Volt technology
http://www.mlive.com/auto/index.ssf/2011/09/stabenow_china_violating_trade.html

The Michigan Democrat today called on U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk to investigate a report by the New York Times indicating the Chinese government is pressuring GM to reveal core Volt technology before it can qualify for subsidies, a demand experts say may be a violation of World Trade Organization rules.

"We must demand that China does not engage in action which amounts to the theft of American-made technologies. If China refuses, I urge to you to take appropriate WTO action to stop this outrage."

GM spent millions developing the Volt's extended-range plug-in technology, and China represents a massive new market that could spur sluggish sales. But the automaker continues to fight pressure to reveal trade secrets in exchange for subsidies similar to those that Asian manufacturers qualify for in the U.S.

Other automakers are interested in selling their advanced-technology vehicles in China, according to the Times, but have held off for similar reasons. However, a Ford executive told the newspaper the company intends to give in to China's demand when it is ready to launch an electric vehicle there.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(here's the New York Times article referenced above.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/business/global/gm-aims-the-volt-at-china-but-chinese-want-its-secrets.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

Hybrid in a Trade Squeeze

The Chinese government is refusing to let the Volt qualify for subsidies totaling up to $19,300 a car unless G.M. agrees to transfer the engineering secrets for one of the Volt’s three main technologies to a joint venture in China with a Chinese automaker
, G.M. officials said. Some international trade experts said China would risk violating World Trade Organization rules if it imposed that requirement.

The consumer subsidies in question are considered crucial for helping electric and hybrid vehicles catch on in China, which became the world’s largest car market in 2009. The government has made a priority of moving beyond cars that burn fossil fuels and emit polluting exhaust. At an industry conference here in this port city near Beijing over the weekend, government officials called for Chinese automakers to put new emphasis on producing more fuel-efficient and technologically advanced models, including gasoline-electric hybrids and all-electric cars.

Right now, the subsidies are available for electric cars made by Chinese automakers, like the e6 made by BYD, giving them a huge competitive advantage. The Volt, if G.M. proceeds with plans to begin selling it in China by year’s end, will be the first mass-market predominantly electric car imported to China by a foreign manufacturer.

Japanese and European automakers in particular have held back for fear of losing trade secrets if they are forced to share their newest technologies with Chinese companies. The Volt would be the pioneer, with the subsidy issue shaping up as a crucial test case. G.M.’s arch rival, Ford, already intends to accede to the Chinese demand, a Ford executive said.

At least five trade experts said that Chinese government policies making it uneconomical to sell an imported electric car in China without transferring technology could violate rules of the World Trade Organization, of which China is a member.

The rules do not allow a country to impose a requirement affecting the internal sale, distribution or purchase of a product in a way that favors its own product over imports,” said Carolyn B. Gleason, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery in Washington and longtime specialist in W.T.O. cases.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/business/global/gm-aims-the-volt-at-china-but-chinese-want-its-secrets.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Levin & Stabenow
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. china will buy a few cars and steal the technology
well they will modify just enough to be able to claim it`s their own design
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Tariffs not Free Trade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC