Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds: Nuke plant among two worst (flooded Ft Calhoun, Omaha)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 05:03 PM
Original message
Feds: Nuke plant among two worst (flooded Ft Calhoun, Omaha)
Source: Omaha World Herald

By Nancy Gaarder

Federal regulators have downgraded the flood-idled nuclear power plant 20 miles north of Omaha, ranking it as one of the two poorest performing reactors in the United States.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in a letter to the Omaha Public Power District released Tuesday, faulted Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station for the performance of its safety systems — those needed to prevent potential problems from becoming potentially catastrophic.

The U.S. has 104 licensed nuclear reactors, and Fort Calhoun is now in a category with one other plant that in laymen's terms could be considered a letter grade of “D.” No plants have an “F,” which requires a plant be shut down.

Fort Calhoun already was under heightened supervision as the Fukushima disaster unfolded in Japan because it was one of three reactors at the time being closely monitored by American regulators.

Read more: http://www.omaha.com/article/20110906/NEWS01/110909797/-1#feds-nuke-plant-among-two-worst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like the only way to get the equivalent of an "F", is to meltdown?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yea seems that way. Let the "F" stand for Fukushima.
Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ...or Fracking - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Except in that case there would still be "no need to shut it down" ...
And the chances of a President being elected that wouldn't be beholden
to the fossil fuel industry is as near to zero these days as you can get.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC