Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(NRC) Virginia quake may have exceeded nuclear plant design

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 05:10 PM
Original message
(NRC) Virginia quake may have exceeded nuclear plant design
Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON, Aug 29 (Reuters) - The historic earthquake that
shut Dominion Resources Inc's (D.N) North Anna nuclear plant in
Virginia last week may have shaken the facility more than it
was designed to withstand, the U.S. nuclear regulator said on
Monday.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said it had sent a
special inspection team to the plant rocked by the
5.8-magnitude quake, after initial reviews from Dominion
indicated the ground motion may have exceeded North Anna's
design parameters.

The plant cannot be restarted until the operator can show
no "functional damage" occurred to equipment needed for safe
operation, the NRC said.

-snip-

It will probably take about three or four weeks before the
team's preliminary findings are released, NRC spokesman Roger
Hannah said. He would not speculate on how long the plant might
be closed, saying it would depend on the team's assessment.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/29/usa-dominion-quake-idUSN1E77S18420110829
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's logically impossible to prove a negative. It will only be possible here to prove
Edited on Mon Aug-29-11 07:54 PM by Ghost Dog
that every item that is tested appears to be positively functioning adequately, safely, seperately and in conjunction with the rest of the parts, the whole...

So, they'd better be required to run those tests on every critical or potentially critical component very thoroughly... and then fire the whole thing up and see what happens.

Or, of course, just play safe and scrap it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's logically quite easy to prove a negative
It's empirically difficult, though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC