Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay marriage opponents sue to overturn state law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
yankeepants Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 02:01 PM
Original message
Gay marriage opponents sue to overturn state law
Source: Syracuse.com

GENESEO, N.Y. (AP) — Opponents to New York's gay marriage law filed the first lawsuit challenging the measure, an anticipated salvo that came one day after weddings were celebrated around the state.

A representative of New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and a rabbi said in a lawsuit filed Monday in state court that New York's Senate violated its own procedures and the state's open meetings law when it approved the bill on June 24.

The lawsuit claims that the Senate prevented lawmakers who opposed the bill from speaking and that the Senate didn't follow procedures that require a bill to go through appropriate committees before a full Senate vote.

Opponents of the gay marriage law had promised lawsuits


Read more: http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/07/gay_marriage_opponents_sue_to.html



Oh and please don't cheat yourselves out of reading the idiotic comments by readers at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. "New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms" --ironic name for the ironically-challenged
:wtf:

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LetTimmySmoke Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. So after a decade or more of whining that our side "runs to the courts"
after a loss at either the ballot box or legislature, here they are doing the same thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Talk about a strained argument...
None of the Republicans CHOSE to speak; the only complaint during the session was the Rubin Diaz didn't get to vent for as long as he wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. the more recent comments are on the good side n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd bet they'd pull this shit for interracial marriage
if they were here in the 50s/60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Haters just wanna keep the Hate going!
...and why is it that these freaks just can't stay out of other people's bedrooms?

Man, I'll be they are SO BAD in bed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. As we've learned from Prop 8 in California and their recent rash of anti choice
legislation in various states, they will never give doing what they think is God's war against gays and women. We must all keep very alert to their underhanded and illegal tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. It makes me sad that this law was passed at all.
After all if people used any common sense you think they would realize that government discrimination against two consenting adults is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Their position is strictly religious...
and therefore should not be recognized by any court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC