Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest Guantánamo prison camp suicide was ‘indefinite detainee’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:06 PM
Original message
Latest Guantánamo prison camp suicide was ‘indefinite detainee’
Source: The Miami Herald

An Afghan man who was found hanging from a bedsheet at Guantánamo last month was held by the Pentagon as an “indefinite detainee” — an Obama administration designation originally conferred on 48 captives at the prison camps in Cuba.

Defense Department officials have not released the list of so-called indefinite detainees. Nor have they notified the men of their status as ineligible for either trial or release among the 171 captives currently held in Guantánamo.

But a Pentagon spokesman, Dave Oten, confirmed this week that the May 18 death of a captive known to his lawyers as Hajji Nassim and to the Defense Department as Inayatullah lowered the indefinite detainee tally.

“It’s a sad case, a very sad case,” said his Miami attorney Paul Rashkind on Tuesday. A federal public defender, Rashkind had been on the Afghan’s case for about a year. He said, though he had never been told of his client’s status as an indefinite detainee, he might have been able to persuade the government otherwise.


Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/28/2289119/latest-guantanamo-prison-camp.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. This shit needs to stop
you could end up there and no one would ever know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. No longer indefinite I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Teaching by example - way to promote liberty, freedom, and justice nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Way to standup for american values Obama.
This is your clusterfuck too, you can't blame it on bush any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. President Obama tried to close it, but Congress forbid him from doing so
Are you suggesting that he break the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Holding people indefinitely without charging them or trying them IS breaking the law.
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 03:53 AM by No Elephants
You don't have to close Gitmo to arrange for someone's release.

Besides, Obama needs to stop using Congress for political cover, then claiming he has no power to keep a campaign promise when his Democratic Congress trlld its its Democratic President "no."

Pelosie and Reid know very well how their members will vote before they take a vote. If Obama had really wanted to close Gitmo, he would have closed it without asking Congress for a permission he didn't need and knew he wouldn't get. A Commander in Chief has ample power and authority to open or close a prison camp.

I know some whine, "but Congress has to give him the money to close it." Please. AS if the military budget has nosclack in it.

Among other things, he managed to engage in Libya without getting extra money from Congress (or asking Congress for a declaration of war, as the Constitution requires, or complied with the War Powers Resolution). That's how he behaves when he actually does want to do something, as opposed to wanting political cover.. DADT (still not implemented), closing Gitmo and the public option were a dog and pony show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Guantánamo appears to be
an icon to be held in our peripheral awareness. It sits out there, and most effectively and subtly reminds us of where the MIC is taking us, step-by-step, day-by-day.

We are reminded that now, anyone can disappear and be held without any due process or the ability to evoke Constitutional rights. The un-Patriot Act and some Presidential powers underscore that fact. Either these powers will be utilized frequently when the time is right, or they will be rescinded by popular demand.

Historically, we should not tolerate this condition, as it is a real and present danger to our liberty and the justice we might expect. That fact that the Orwellian conditions are already in place and anyone can "unexist" proves that we are already over the line and really on the temptation of circumstances for utilization of these despotic potentials now in our midst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. So even his year long lawyer did not know his clients status?
Amazing what those small band of terrorists were able to do to the US constitution and civil liberties, habeus corpus etc... and creating the atmosphere for American fascists to elevate their stature and gain influence.

It would be nice if at the very least the ones that have received this "indefinite detainee" status are put on a public stand detailing to the public the crimes they have been accused of based on witnesses. Even if the witnesses are all US army members, or otherwise weak and suspect hearsay which would never hold up in a "real" court. I just want to know WHY. What individual crimes have each one of these committed that is so heinous that they will never taste freedom again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hate to say it, but this blood is on your hands, Obama
Anytime you want to quit following in fascist footsteps of former president Bush (remember, that guy who you promised us "change" from?) I won't complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gulag.
Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. plumbob
plumbob

At least the Russian government, from 1917 and forward to Gorbatsjev, who dispanded the unit in 1988, was clear about it all, that the Gulag Camp system was there..

The US government, are not able, or willing to admit that Gutanamo Bay Camp X Ray, are a Gulag camp, where peopole is keept for ever if the government shoose to do so.. Its maybe not that cold as in the old Gulag System.. But still..

Dicloticna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I agree completely. This gulag offshore is one of the darkest blots on the US
and we've had plenty of others - slavery, genocide of First Americans, you name it.

I'm ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Guantánamo “Suicides”: A Camp Delta sergeant blows the whistle
*Just some background for those who may be interested:

Please enjoy Scott Horton’s feature from the March 2010 issue of Harper’s Magazine, winner of the National Magazine Award for Reporting.

1. “Asymmetrical Warfare”
When President Barack Obama took office last year, he promised to “restore the standards of due process and the core constitutional values that have made this country great.” Toward that end, the president issued an executive order declaring that the extra-constitutional prison camp at Guantánamo Naval Base “shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than one year from the date of this order.” Obama has failed to fulfill his promise. Some prisoners there are being charged with crimes, others released, but the date for closing the camp seems to recede steadily into the future. Furthermore, new evidence now emerging may entangle Obama’s young administration with crimes that occurred during the George W. Bush presidency, evidence that suggests the current administration failed to investigate seriously—and may even have continued—a cover-up of the possible homicides of three prisoners at Guantánamo in 2006.

Late on the evening of June 9 that year, three prisoners at Guantánamo died suddenly and violently. Salah Ahmed Al-Salami, from Yemen, was thirty-seven. Mani Shaman Al-Utaybi, from Saudi Arabia, was thirty. Yasser Talal Al-Zahrani, also from Saudi Arabia, was twenty-two, and had been imprisoned at Guantánamo since he was captured at the age of seventeen. None of the men had been charged with a crime, though all three had been engaged in hunger strikes to protest the conditions of their imprisonment. They were being held in a cell block, known as Alpha Block, reserved for particularly troublesome or high-value prisoners.

As news of the deaths emerged the following day, the camp quickly went into lockdown. The authorities ordered nearly all the reporters at Guantánamo to leave and those en route to turn back. The commander at Guantánamo, Rear Admiral Harry Harris, then declared the deaths “suicides.” In an unusual move, he also used the announcement to attack the dead men. “I believe this was not an act of desperation,” he said, “but an act of asymmetrical warfare waged against us.” Reporters accepted the official account, and even lawyers for the prisoners appeared to believe that they had killed themselves. Only the prisoners’ families in Saudi Arabia and Yemen rejected the notion.

in full: http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/01/hbc-90006368
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I remember this article. It was a really good one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsnotaboutu Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. If There Is No Hope.......
To ever see the light at the end of the tunnel, to ever know freedom again, I think I would choose the same fate as this detainee, end the torture and find the light of a different world.

It is so horrible that these Reich-wing politicians can make the whole world feel so hopeless for so many, while they wallow in billions of dollars created by their faux war on terror.:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. And Gitmo is still open because???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubicleGuy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. This must be the plan
Have them become so demoralized that they choose the big dirt nap instead of waiting for some kind of American justice system to come to their rescue. Pretty soon, the problem has taken care of itself, and the reputation of the United States that surely would have suffered should we have attempted to put any of these people through an actual trial remains mostly unsullied.

Except to anyone paying attention, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. A pox on O's house for this. >:(
Bush started this shit, but O is making a disgusting mistake by continuing it. He brings shame on himself and shame on our country. :mad:

Liberals, where the hell are you on this issue???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. ya know, just FUCK Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. This was not a
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 12:03 PM by bvar22
It was murder.
Under severe conditions, a human being will kill himself to escape prolonged torture.
Those imposing the conditions that drive someone to suicide are guilty of murder.

Here is what Campaign Obama had to say about Guantanamo and Human Rights:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-15-2010/respect-my-authoritah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. It is unjust to lock humans in a box indefinetly.
If they are guilty of a crime, try them and punish them. If they owe something to someone for this crime, have them fulfill it. If not, let them go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC