Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP sources: Pakistanis tip off militants again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:25 PM
Original message
AP sources: Pakistanis tip off militants again
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. officials say Pakistan has apparently tipped off militants at two more bomb-building factories in its tribal areas, giving the terror suspects time to flee, after U.S. intelligence shared the locations with the Pakistani government.

Those officials believe Pakistan's insistence on seeking local tribal elders' permission before raiding the areas may have most directly contributed to the militants' flight. U.S. officials have pushed for Pakistan to keep the location of such targets secret prior to the operations, but the Pakistanis say their troops cannot enter the lawless regions without giving the locals notice.

All officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss matters of intelligence.

The latest incidents bring to a total of four bomb-making sites that the U.S. has shared with Pakistan only to have the terrorist suspects flee before the Pakistani military arrived much later. The report does not bode well for attempts by both sides to mend relations and rebuild trust after the U.S. raid on May 2 that killed Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, a Pakistani army town only 35 miles (56.32 kilometers) from the capital Islamabad.

Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2011-06-18-us-pakistan-militants_n.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is getting to be a real clown show.
Except a lot of people are getting killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pakistan doesn't seem to be "With Us"
Like BushCo told us they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They are a bit mad at us about that Bin Laden raid... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They do NOT...
...like that their honored guest got fragged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. BushCo gave them $20 Billion in cash no strings attached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. But but but .... Cheney sold then Nuclear Detonators
they must be our ally - right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is why we must leave Afganastan NOW


This is why we must leave Afganastan NOW before we end up leave one hell of a lot of military equipment behind...we need Pakistan to get the ground equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is exactly why President Obama took out OBL the way he did
I believe the previous administration not only knew where he was but made sure he wasn't touched.


Cut funding to Pakistan, Afghanastan and Iraq. Let them do as they may...it is well past time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agree so much! Our foreign policy for years has equaled >>>
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. You mean capture and shoot, rather than capture and extract?
I ain't buyin' that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Extract to what? Martydom?
OBL is the one that set his course to his destiny. He is ultimately responsible for his owndeath. He killed 3000 plus Americans and didn't blink an eye, he was allowed to escape at Tora Bora by the previous administration. He relied on his boogy man status to keep the United States playing this ridiculous security paranoia game. Without him and his billions of dollars his movement will suffer.

Just as any criminal at large in the U.S who kills and then goes on the run they have the option of turning themselves in or getting in a gun fight and going down. OBL chose the latter. No sympathy here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I have NO sympathy for bin Laden.
The narrative about a gun-fight is as specious as so many of those dispensed concerning these related events.

Click my sig and read.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Which one?
"The narrative about a gun-fight".... which one? Which narrative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Exactly. There were a few. Weren't there?
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. If we pulled our troops out, then those bombs would have no targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StercusAccidit Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. They still would
A pretty good number of bombs aren't targeted at NATO forces, they're directed at civilians or other targets with much less security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Are you serious? Just like drones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. They will be used against India and Afghanis. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC