http://articles.cnn.com/2001-09-16/us/inv.binladen.denial_1_bin-laden-taliban-supreme-leader-mullah-mohammed-omar?_s=PM:UShttp://911review.com/articles/usamah/khilafah.htmlUmmat Interviews Usamah Bin-Ladin
28 September 2001
Bin-Ladin Denies Involvement in the 9/11 Attacks
http://web.archive.org/web/20021218105636/www.wdr.de/tv/monitor/beitraege.phtml?id=379translated
Klaus Bednarz: "And the propaganda war goes on in the past week, the U.S. government presented in English translation and an amateur video that shows bin Laden in a circle of followers, and according to President Bush.
Should be 'A damning admission of guilt' Bin Laden.
MONITOR has expressed concern the State Department, the Arabic text version of the video tape and analyzed by independent, certified Arab and German linguists and orientalists have.
And behold: The presented by the U.S. government to the world English translation is manipulated not only partially but even contains errors. A report by Ekkehard Sieker and Georg Restle. "
snip
Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini, Arabist. "I have checked the translation of the Pentagon's carefully This translation is very problematic It is the most important points that would prove the guilt of Bin Laden, not identical with the Arab tone.."
Example 1: According to the Pentagon translation says Bin Laden: "We have calculated the number of deaths of the enemy in advance. " "Pre", in English: "in advance"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the October 2004 tape (which was an 'October Surprise' that gave W Bush a huge 6 point bounce right before the election) where Bin Laden supposedly finally takes credit is VERY dodgy ( as were most)
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/29/lkl.01.htmlCRONKITE: What we just heard. So now the question is basically right now, how will this affect the election? And I have a feeling that it could tilt the election a bit. In fact, I'm a little inclined to think that Karl Rove, the political manager at the White House, who is a very clever man, he probably set up bin Laden to this thing. The advantage to the Republican side is to get rid of, as a principal subject of the campaigns right now, get rid of the whole problem of the al Qaqaa explosive dump. Right now, that, the last couple of days, has, I think, upset the Republican campaign.
KING: Are there enough undecideds to tilt this? Or what do you think of the whole election picture?
CRONKITE: Well, I think it's one of the biggest messes we've had in a long time. I believe that we're undoubtedly not going to know the results of this election. I don't want to knock you off the air on Monday night or anything, or Tuesday night. But I suspect that we're not going to know who the next president is, whether it is Bush or the new man, until very probably sometime in the early spring. There's so much controversy that they're planting, deliberately planting at the polls, that there's almost certainly to be a suit going back to the Supreme Court eventually, going through the other courts slowly first.
Madeleine Albright: Bush Planning Bin Laden October Surprise (which is exactly what happened)
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/12/17/15126.shtmlhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21530470/ns/nightly_news/t/was-bin-ladens-last-video-faked/http://mediamatters.org/research/200610310011http://911physics.atspace.com/Pages/Osama.htmhttp://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers12/paper1155.htmlhttp://www.physics911.net/kevinbarrett----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
discussions on other tapes
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/nov/30/alqaida.terrorismhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2526309.stmhttp://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=3828678http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/16/international/europe/16MEDI.html?ex=1006921732&ei=1&en=b9f38a3a78c0cab5http://www.awitness.org/news/december_2001/bin_laden_confession_tape_fraud.html