Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Counts 4 More Secret Records Demands in WikiLeaks Probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:31 PM
Original message
ACLU Counts 4 More Secret Records Demands in WikiLeaks Probe
Edited on Fri May-20-11 03:32 PM by Hissyspit
Source: Wired

ACLU Counts 4 More Secret Records Demands in WikiLeaks Probe

By Kevin Poulsen
May 20, 2011  |  3:19 pm  | 

An examination of case numbers of entirely sealed dockets in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Virginia, suggests to the ACLU that there were four Justice Department records demands issued in the same manner as a December 2010 demand sent to Twitter, which seeks information on three current and former WikiLeaks associates.

On Thursday, the ACLU, in conjunction with the EFF, asked a federal judge to open those dockets to the public.

“(T)here is still no publicly available docket with individual docket entries that gives the public notice that any applications or orders granting or denying those applications, or any challenges to such applications or orders, have been filed under seal,” the ACLU wrote in an appeal Thursday. “Regardless of whether it is appropriate to maintain certain documents under seal, the absence of a public docket—somewhere—containing docket entries identifying any other applications, orders, motions, or other documents is simply not permissible.”

The Justice Department has been seeking transaction records on the Twitter accounts since December under 18 USC 2703(d), a provision of the 1994 Stored Communications Act that allows law enforcement access to non-content internet records, such as transaction information, without demonstrating the “probable cause” needed for a full-blown search warrant. A 2703(d) order is issued when prosecutors provide a judge with “specific and articulable facts” that show the information they seek is relevant and material to a criminal investigation. The people targeted in the records demand don’t themselves have to be suspected of criminal wrongdoing.

Read more: http://m.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/05/wikileaks-aclu/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where would this country be without the ACLU?
Stone Age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jesus, it seems like every day there is another lethal blow
to the notion of an actual American democracy.

Glad I could send the ACLU a hundred bucks recently from out of the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. 1994 Stored Communications Act.
1994.

Let that sink in for a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC