Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Californians back raising taxes on state's wealthy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 12:28 PM
Original message
Californians back raising taxes on state's wealthy
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

With negotiations over how to solve California's $26.6 billion state budget deficit stalled, a new poll released today shows strong bipartisan support for something Sacramento lawmakers this year haven't seriously debated: raising taxes on the wealthiest residents.

Seventy-eight percent of likely California voters support a 1 percent increase in the income tax rate for Californians earning more than $500,000 a year, according to the poll, which was conducted by Democratic pollster Ben Tulchin and sponsored by the California Federation of Teachers.

A one percentage point increase, which would raise an estimated $2.5 billion a year, offers a possible Plan B for helping solve the budget deficit, with 60 percent of Republican respondents and 79 percent of independents and other voters backing it, along with 89 percent of Democrats. The maximum income tax rate is 9.55 percent, according to the Californian Franchise Tax Board.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/01/MNP21INRMH.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sanity at Last
Edited on Fri Apr-01-11 12:59 PM by FreakinDJ
you should see the number of yachts on SF Bay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Try going to Santa Catalina island
yacht city!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. There is room in the Gulf to park their yachts if they don't wish to contribute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. let's get the referendum to abolish the state income tax on the ballot.
is this another April fools?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Overturn Prop 13!!!!
And I say this as a California homeowner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. word! +100K n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. word! +100K n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. That would only cause a new property tax revolt.
A far better approach would be to limit Prop. 13 to primary residences with a value cap, or to tier the protections based on property value. There are other residential tweaks that could be made as well, such as removing or reducing the hereditary provision.

Taxing commercial real estate at market value would solve our budget problems for a long, long time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hmmm...tax the rich. What a novel idea... GO CA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal life Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wasn't California looking into single payer before governator got in the way
This would save the state a fortune.


http://fucorporatemedia.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bipartisan among the voters, not politicians, I feel safe in assuming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hate that news
Now we will see another influx here in Oregon & Washington states
and inflate our house prices which have just become affordable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Since when do buyers determine price?
Sorry, but there's always been that pesky little GAPING HOLE in that old canard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. you think people will uproot themselves because of a small increase in tax rates?
come on. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Revenue shortage is the answer Ahnuld!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC