Another UPI story:Additionally, new reports emerging from Iraq Tuesday indicate that an unholy alliance is being forged between Sadr's militia, known as the
Mehdi's Army and the Sunni resistance, traditionally grouped under the banner of Mohammed's Army. And on Tuesday U.S. troops battled
both; followers of Mohammed's Army in the Sunni hotbed of Fallujah where the Marines are currently engaged in fierce clashes, as well as
armed followers of the young cleric in Sadr City and other parts of the country who are resisting American attempts to disarm them, as
thousands of armed militiamen faced off American tanks and armored personnel carriers.
In just two short days, the situation in Iraq has changed dramatically, from one of terrorists and foreign jihadi agitators fighting the coalition,
to that of a domestic popular rebellion already being compared by some to the Palestinian intifada, or uprising.
And while the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority has labeled Sadr "an outlaw" and seeks to apprehend him and put him on trial for the
murder of fellow Shiite cleric Abdel Majig al-Khoei last spring, there is also little doubt that his political clout will skyrocket in the Arab and
Islamic world.
In short, the United States' gamble to go after Sadr may have grossly backfired. The question is why did the U.S. decide to go after Sadr
at this particular time? The answer could be that as the countdown to the June 30 handover of sovereignty to Iraqis is underway with less
than 90 days remaining on the clock, the U.S. -- at the instigation of certain parties who would like to see the elimination of the maverick
cleric -- may have decided on the need to clean the playing field of potential dissent voices for the Iraqi government to be.
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040406-120830-3652r