Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Issa says Obama administration is 'one of most corrupt'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:48 PM
Original message
Issa says Obama administration is 'one of most corrupt'
Source: Washington Post

The Republican congressman who is taking over responsibility for congressional oversight called President Obama's administration "one of the most corrupt administrations" on Sunday and predicted that the investigations he is planning over the next two years could result in about $200 billion in savings for U.S. taxpayers.

...

Issa, who as chairman will have subpoena power, said he would seek to ferret out waste across the federal bureaucracy. While he used fiery rhetoric in describing the Obama administration in a series of television interviews Sunday, he said he would focus on wasteful spending over political persecutions.

Asked on "Fox News Sunday" about reports that the White House is staffing up on lawyers to prepare for his oversight hearings, Issa said: "They're going to need more accountants."

...

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/02/AR2011010201493.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is He Going to Take Down the Zombie Banks, Then?a
and Uncle Ben Bernanke?

And the BFEE for dessert, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Typical
Nothing but Repugnican's typical rhetoric 'he is the most...<fill in whatever you think gets the most negative reaction?' This is directly out of the Newt Gingrich spin book. It's never my opponent is Liberal it is 'my opponent is absolutely the most liberal Congressman in the history of the United States'. To me this just shows that people that use this rhetorical trick don't really have anything to say and probably don't have the brains to really say anything important so they just use verbal tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. The next two years are going to be filled with investigations from this guy
His agenda includes trying to bring Obama down by investigation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Issa has been preparing to be the point man for a long time.
And given that the administration seems to consider wikileaks a bigger threat than the Republicans, I guess he'll rampage all over Obama until we take the House back. It's a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, let's hope Wikileaks turns it around
and start releasing indictable bunch of cables against 100-200 Republican Congressmen for treason/high crimes.

That will ensure a stronger Democratic majority by 2012, hopefully a filibusterproof one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. But the government told everyone not to read wikileaks.
So if wikileaks does get some info like that to release, it will help the administration in spite of its own orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. "Treason....
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 05:49 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...shall consist only in levying War against them (the United States), or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort".

Which Republican congressmen are doing that, pray tell?

'High crimes' is meaningless except in the context of an impeachment -- and you can't impeach a Congressman.

There is a Constitution, and words mean things. Both are inconvenient at DU, but both are facts.

The tendency of people on this board to mirror their opposite numbers at places like RedState.com is a continuing puzzlement to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:06 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. oh brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. I am always late to the party
what did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #44
65. It's down the memory hole.
Gotta get there quick before anything controversial is deleted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Since he tipped his hand long ago I'm hoping the WH is ready for this guy
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 05:13 PM by eleny
I'm eager for the revelations about Issa's past to surface like an ongoing mini series. Tit for tat.

You know how arrogant he's been. Seems like this Grand Poo-Bah is primed for a fall from that lofty place he's built in his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. We could also question how much money Issa is spending...
...not as in tit for tat but as in whether he's A) wasting taxpayer dollars on partisan investigations and B)tying up public servants, whose salaries are paid by the taxpayers, with meaningless and wasteful subpoenas.

I think public demonstrations, town meetings, etc., could be used to focus on Issa when he thinks he's going to be able to pull off the old GOP trick of endless investigation.

The media has been covering his plan for some time, so it's not as though this has been a secret. Let's call the tea party's bluff on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. didn't Issa have some legal problems before he became a politician?
And isn't he the one who led the recall against Davis, thinking he was going to be the next governor? I'd Issa should look in the mirror. And after eight fekkin years of Little Boots, I don't consider this the most corrupt administration. Actually, after looking at Iran Contra, S&L debacle, Enron, murder of key journalists-I think he doesn't know what he's talking about. I know one administration who could beat this one hands down!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Issa's job is to tell and retell Big Lies.
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 05:24 PM by EFerrari
Yeah, he unseated Davis and was then thrown over by Arnold's people.

/oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Yeah, and he cried as much
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 07:56 PM by Mz Pip
as Boner at his press conference when he withdrew from the governor's race. Poor Darrel, actually thought he could become governor if he just put up enough money. The fool and his money were certainly parted in that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
51. As horrible as Arnold has been, we still dodged a bullet there.
Dick Cheney wanted to turn California red and he came this close to doing it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Yes
According to Wikipedia's Issa page, Issa stole a car in Pennsylvania in 1971, stole a car in Cleveland in 1972, and was convicted for possession of an unregistered gun in Michigan in 1972.

In 1979, he attempted to commit insurance fraud in California by faking the theft of his own car.

His fortune (and it's very large) was made in the most obvious business for a retired car thief to be in: car alarms! The company he used to own--he got out when he was elected to Congress--makes the Viper alarm, and its "please step away from the car" siren is a digitized recording of Issa's voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. whether or not the administration and/or Obama considers wikileaks a bigger threat than
the repubs, is something I don't know, but I do know that that has nothing to do with Issa's plans, which wouldn't be different whether wikileaks existed. In short, wikileaks has nothing to do with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I hope that California Democratic Party is recording everything Issa does
and making beauties out of clips how much waste Mr. Darrel Issa is, and deserves to be thrown into prison for the next 4 centuries.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I know
they're going to Whitewater Obama and his administration. However, times are not as good here in Amurikkka like they were under Clinton, and this may backfire on him and his party. Even impeached, Clinton's approval ratings were high.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. The next two years are going to be filled with investigations OF this guy
... including a couple of tax audits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. Issa is also one of the biggest crooks up there. Takes one to know one I guess.
In case anybody's not familiar with some of the details, there's this:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/06/25/ISSA.TMP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. There's a lot more than what's shown there too, including suspected arson as well...
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 11:35 PM by cascadiance
http://politicalcorrection.org/factcheck/201006010007

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/6215/jihad-darrells-thuggery-v-rahms-way-pot-kettle-very-black/

Hmm... I wonder what the statute of limitations on some of these crimes are, in case we were to do an independent investigation of him as well!

And he also had the nerve to say that Carol Lam didn't do enough to prosecute illegal immigration, which is why he was "recommending" that she be one of the attorneys that Bushco fired...

I guess she didn't prosecute Golden Gate Fence Company the way Issa wanted and didn't leave his rich buddies alone and only "go after the brown people" the way he wanted...

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6626823
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
61. yeah, unfortunately he'll have no problem spending
millions of our dollars for his hyped up shite, then the repugs will tell the american people already hurting that they can't afford to give aid to americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey Fat Issa. You want corrupt? Take a fucking look in the mirror
and meet Mr. Corrupt.

Fuck off, and I hope the Ethics Committee convenes and looks at your criminal record and decide you're not even worth the oxygen or the space so explusion is the only option for Mr. Issa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. poor little country....
America work so hard for so long for this! Head shaking time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. hmmm...an arsonist (maybe) talking about corruption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. But all those lucrative contracts
lovingly tossed by the Bush/Cheney administration to Halliburton was just fine and dandy. Obviously no corruption there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Categorical argument. No non-Republican administration..
...is, can ever be, a legitimate one.

Accept the premise and all else follows. There remains only to determine the precise way in which the administration fails to be legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Yeah, because the 15 million + unemployed would rather he do that.
Screw creating jobs and fixing our country, when you can spend all that time and money on witch hunts. It will go over really well with most of the country. You betcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. He will overreach and it will backfire on him
If you recall, he bankrolled the recall of Gray Davis, expecting to put himself in the governor's office. My point is, the guy doesn't line up his ducks properly. His machinations are sloppy. Already he's talking way beyond what he can prove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. sniff, sniff...
My smell-dar is going off! I smell a set up. Does anyone know if the Obama Administration has replaced the Bush patronage folks yet? As I recall, Bush pushed patronage way down the ladder in Interior, FBI, CIA, and Justice for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Was he the guy who went after Clinton's Christmas card list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. I say GOOD. Let them educate Issa, if there is some waste, then it should be cut.
Edited on Sun Jan-02-11 05:27 PM by WingDinger
Explaining the socalled waste, will allow enough room for a brilliant constitutional educator and authority, and a hardened solid Dem straight shooter backing him up, to trounce. Issa has OBVIOUSLY backed off from criminal indictments. Wise choice. One false move, from the party known to root for failure of this pres, and they will be told to sit down and shut up. I am looking for when they try to inspect his PeePee, like Clinton. We are going to pounce. The population is tiring of antics. Obama is a satan worshipping, baby seal clubbing, Communist. Where can they POSSIBLY go after that? The population is beginning to show evidence of extinguishment. I believe that will ramp up when they start threatening doctors that do abortions, and/or take Obamacare as payment.

I expect Obama to come from the sky, in a slam dunk. There will be ample opportunities. Teabaggers and GOP are RIPE for a fall. Even if it ain't the greek Gods, it's the sensationalist press. They are about to be hoisted on their own putrid petard. When the GOP takes all credit, teabaggers will go all Mark Chapman on their masters. It's gonna be fireworks. I truly believe our side will rule that landscape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetapogee Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. I hope you are right
but I have said this many times before. The pukites have said that they are going to investigate and I for one take them at their word. My prediction is that they will basically leave the President alone and concentrate on the underlings, the soft underbelly. Of course I have no crystal ball to consult but I think the primary area of concern will be with who and where the stimulus money went to. Hopefully there is a full accounting of the funds and they were used wisely. If not, look out, I think the pigs will use the public congressional BP style hearings as their template for handling their investigations. In many respects, I think we would have been better off as a party if we had lost the senate and not the house but that is a debate for another time and place. One thing for sure, the repugs have painted themselves into a corner and almost have to make some moves against us to satisfy their SFB base. It also allows them to attack dems without having to accomplish anything themselves. You may be 100% correct but I think we underestimate the enemy at our own expense. We need to do some investigating of our own, get down to the marrow and shine some light into the darkness. Why we haven't done this over the last four years is a mystery to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. We would have been better off, if we had never touched Bush's mess, But we did.
It's called governing. And not for Ideologues. And they will be shown wanting. Especially when they are now so heavily weighted to junior status talent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. This clown is a nut AND a crook...
...he has has his own crooked garbage.

Why is no one bringing up that $hit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. Pot, kettle, black, Mr. Issa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Nope.
More like "projection" on Issa's part. They are the masters of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. Once you subtract the lunch budgets, health benefits and
salaries of all the congress critters that will be involved from the "$200 billion in savings for U.S. taxpayers" I suspect the word "savings" will have to be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Smirk." --a certain MORE corrupt president. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. GO HERE and read about CrazyDarrell and his background...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
38. Well to be honest I would also like a full accounting
on the TARP funds that money was lent to AIG and the Banks with an understanding that they would give it back. If they haven't made arrangements to give it back then their CEO's and boards better be getting no salary. If they have given it back where is it, it can't be a defecit if it was recouped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Yeah, like that will happen............
They'll investigate the Hell out of some gay staffer's sex life for the next two years, but REAL crimes? Committed against the American people by capitalists? No way that'll be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. I wonder how he came up with his ranking of the Obama administration
I would rate these five administrations as the most corrupt:

1. Ronald Reagan: Iran, Iraq, the Contras...

2. George W. Bush: two illegal wars, 9/11 failures, Hurricane Katrina failures, private armies...

3. George H.W. Bush: two wars during his administration, and he's responsible for setting up the conditions that caused both of them! The Panama war was caused by GHWB putting Noriega on the CIA payroll and encouraging him to become what he was, and the Iraq war was caused by GHWB giving Saddam permission to invade Kuwait.

4. Ulysses S. Grant: lots of scandals, the most important of which were the Black Friday Gold Panic of 1869 and the Whiskey Ring of 1875.

5. Warren G. Harding: Teapot Dome scandal.

How about Nixon? I'm going to put him down at number six, though you might want to put him as high as three--just leave Reagan and Bush II at the top of this list, 'kay?

Now, what do all these scandal-ridden presidents have in common? Why, of course! They are all Republicans! All the worst crooks in American history were Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
43. What a fucking joke. Issa is a fascist fuck. This is proof.
If he thinks Obama is corrupt, then this surely implies he will prosecute the entire bush administration. Yeah...I didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
46. FU Issa
And you are as corrupt as they come. Another Repuke POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. The pot calling the kettle black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ford_Prefect Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-11 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. This seems like it is being stage managed by Karl Rove et al...
This seems like it is being stage managed by Karl Rove (et alia)... The only way someone with Issa's past gets to investigate is to rig the situation prior to any real questions. One wonders how much looking into whose past will stand the glare of a real DOJ look at facts and figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
50. More projection from a fucking criminal.
I hate that fuck's guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
52. how much are the Koch bros willing to pay to convince Americans of this?
Edited on Mon Jan-03-11 12:56 AM by 0rganism
That's really the bottom line here - how much moolah will the rich and leisurely be willing to sink into a nationwide propaganda blitz to convince middle America that President Obama and his administration are the root of all evils afflicting our fair country.

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if there were still significant corruption in the Obama administration, since AFAIK he never replaced the majority of W's staff croney appointments. Should have been thing 1 on the agenda in 2009, too - everyone out of the pool. I'm pretty sure the next GOP preznit won't have any delusions of bipartisanship to be expressed by retaining the predecessor's underlings, none whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
53. iow.... "I'm going to make Dan Burton look tame"
protect local watermelons another loon is empowered and on the loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
54. We were warned this would happen
SO I don't want anyone acting surprised over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeryConfused Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
55. Ironic coming from the most corrupt member of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
56. And more....
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-turn/2011/01/democrats_had_predicted_--_hop.html

Of course, those of us who gritted our teeth through eight years of "keep our powder dry" nonsense will recall with total clarity two stolen elections, two illegal and amoral wars, the disappearance of billions of dollars in cash in Iraq, a guy named Jack Abramoff spending two years detailing exactly how he got his hooks into the Republicans in Congress, with names, six years of the House Oversight Committee ignoring clear violations of budgetary submission laws, ignored subpoenas, 90 million emails generated and sent through an illegal communications back-channel, and so on.

So it's a piece of cake to force Issa's committee to circle the wagons: simply start to shoot a few dozen Bush fish in the barrel before the statute of limitations runs out on them, and point out that they escaped all oversight for virtually the entirety of the 2000s up to now, thanks to the mostly Republican-controlled House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

They'll go right back into their cover-up shell and we won't hear from them again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Meany Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
57. Yeah, but administration officials can ignore the subpoenas
with impunity. The Bushies set the precedent on that. And if they do enforce the subpoenas, Obama can have the DOJ start arresting Bush officials for war crimes. Or he could claim that they belong to a fourth branch of government answerable only to the VP. Oh...but that would not be bipartisn,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
58. (delete- dupe)
Edited on Tue Jan-04-11 10:56 AM by Art_from_Ark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
59.  Mr. Issa should take a look at the Reagan administration
Edited on Tue Jan-04-11 10:54 AM by Art_from_Ark
Over 130 Reagan administration officials were investigated, indicted, and/or convicted-- a record for the 20th century!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dash87 Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
60. Even if true, it's not Obama's fault
Corruption doesn't just form over night. This was a gradual corrupting of the government after the government stopped caring, and greed became the agenda over helping its own citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
62. Issa is a Assa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
63. He knows all that before even conducting any investigations...wow!
He has already labeled this administration as most corrupt and has identified $200 billion in savings all before one day on the job.

Either he is super impressive or full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
64. ROFL
Coming from ISSA!!?? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC