Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seven wounded in Iraq suicide blast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bfusco Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:05 AM
Original message
Seven wounded in Iraq suicide blast
Sorry if this is a dupe. It's hard to keep up. Things are really unraveling.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1080919.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, Kirkuk is 250 km north of Baghdad...
Is that Kurd country? Looks like the whole country is on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bfusco Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes
Kirkuk is in the Kurdish region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks. That kinda blows CentCom's daily briefings huh?
It appears that it is not just the Saddam-loyalists in the Sunni triangle that don't want us there, it appears to be all three major factions in the entire country including the Kurds and Shiites uprising all in the last 24 hour period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. CNN and MSRNC spinners saying...
That there are not many followers of Sadr, most of Iraqi Shiites listen to al-Sistani! :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The problem with that spin
...is that this trouble began when Sistani said he was done talking with any Americans on Friday. This was disseminated in Iraq on Saturday. Country wide violence on Sunday. If he is expected to restrain the violence, Americans don't understand what it means when he says I'm through talking. Al Sadr took this as a go ahead signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yup. That accounts for all three major ethnic groups in Iraq.
Edited on Mon Apr-05-04 08:38 AM by TahitiNut
The Sunnis are fighting back. The Shiites are fighting back. The Kurds are fighting back.

IMO, this indicates a widespread recognition that the US occupation is, for all intents and purposes, the imposition of a tyranny of the wealthy global hegemonists. The lateral factionalization (i.e. 1% rich vs. 95% poor) appears to be more evident than longitudinal factionalization (Kurd vs. Sunni vs. Shiite).

Every one of these "insurgency" actions is like the tip of a populist iceberg. It's a myth to think that such militia can operate without the support, at least tacit, of a large plurality of the indigenous population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bfusco Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. It is probably only the beginning
If one looks at the history of guerrilla insurgencies you see the same pattern. The occupying powers are dismissive of the degree of resistance and level of popular support. When confronted with resistance, the occupiers tend to respond with heavy handed measures that cause even more damage and draw even greater support for resistance. The Battle of Algiers is a great movie that poignantly depicts this. Even when they when Bush and Co were trying to spin it as foreign fighters entering Iraq causing trouble one would have to raise the question on how foreign fighters are able to move around the country and logistically plan for attacks. Someone had to be providing them shelter and support. For now it is lateral but once the United States decides it has had enough and pulls out that's when you will see them fighting one another and the blood bath will erupt and who knows what will emerge (another Hussein, Taliban, radical Shia extremism, splintering of the country along ethnic lines causing regional instability).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Not necessarily
It is a divided city, about 1/3 each of Kurds/Arabs/Turkmen. Since the state collapsed the Kurdish collaborationist parties have flooded the city with people to displace the Turkmen & Arab sections. Naturally there is tension there. The Turkmen are in league with Turkey & Muqtada al-Sadr, the Arabs left somewhat in a tight spot and many then support the resistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC