|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:18 AM Original message |
Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbperrin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. I cannot, for the life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Whatever it is, I am glad she is that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
70. Clarence "Long Dong Silver" Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Maybe Clarence hasn't cleaned up his act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I was thinking the same thing about this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CanonRay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 07:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
112. Yeah, Jack Daniels at 7am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Properly, it is not an addiction, it is a fetish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:21 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. While I bow to what is obviously your superior knowledge, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Agree ... those studying internet porn certainly see an "addiction" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:02 AM Response to Reply #16 |
29. I know where you're coming from; I just think that precision in language is important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cartach (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:30 PM Response to Reply #29 |
102. Why would he have to "dry out for a couple of months" if he isn't - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
54. Tansy...now you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demigoddess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
69. can we keep on topic, especially when it is so much fun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 02:48 AM Response to Reply #16 |
110. My only problem with using the term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bitchkitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 04:45 AM Response to Reply #110 |
184. My unsolicited opinion: dump his worthless ass. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #14 |
32. Uncle Clarenence explained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
80. PROCESS ADDICTIONS show the same disease path as substance addictions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 10:06 PM Response to Reply #80 |
170. With probably the same under 5% "success rate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:35 PM Response to Reply #170 |
174. my experience with 12 step programs has been good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #174 |
175. I also know folks who derived some benefit from 12-step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #175 |
181. yes, I think the critical factor is a determined DESIRE to grow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 12:38 PM Response to Reply #181 |
182. I wish "recovery" were a "bigger business" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:44 AM Response to Reply #9 |
37. That doesn't seem likely to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Are you kidding? If it wasn't for people with dark, sinful secrets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:23 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. No, I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #41 |
87. Oh snap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:48 PM Response to Reply #41 |
93. The entire movement is nothing but a public expression of private neuroses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
83. If Thomas admitted that Hill et al were/are telling the truth, he would be impeached 4 perjury (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #83 |
94. Could we push for an impeachment for perjury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
71. If it's not too painful for you, Tansy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:46 PM Response to Reply #71 |
101. I'll give you some, but with the disclaimer that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 02:11 AM Response to Reply #101 |
109. I'm so sorry you had to experience all of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 07:31 AM Response to Reply #109 |
180. Apology accepted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. She lives in a tea party bubble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
26. Why did Martha Mitchell phone reporters from her bath tub? I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:19 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Or maybe she used the alcohol to give her the courage to do so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #26 |
46. Shades of drunk dialing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #46 |
78. Or they were up from the night before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
91. I got one of those calls from a woman with a drinking problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #46 |
122. on Bill Maher they were discussing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #26 |
55. You need to get the version about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:41 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. You're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:12 PM Response to Reply #60 |
85. If I remember clearly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:30 AM Response to Reply #85 |
118. I seem to recall something along those lines too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
75. It was so she could turn the water on and no one would here her. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
35. Because she really thinks Anita Hill was lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:46 PM Response to Reply #35 |
62. Denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shallah Kali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:36 PM Response to Reply #62 |
100. Flogging for God |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
40. She's stupid if she thought going after Anita Hill was would serve as a pre-emptive strike. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
56. I have heard she was a creationist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
61. I read some speculation that she started it to deflect attention away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
64. Because her heart is telling her the truth but her training is telling her a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
79. Deleted message |
Ysabela (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
82. Because the Dems are hitting hard on the Citizens United issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
86. The bigggest ego on the court knows he's untouchable.What type would marry him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:24 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Court corruption when judges attend private political gatherings of the wealthy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. who have cases pending before the court or soon will have.Citizens United was a set up from the begi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iwillnevergiveup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:42 AM Response to Reply #89 |
107. Maybe Ginny rented this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
curiousdemo (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
104. Ginny is a Rightwing Fringe loon, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomThom (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
113. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
2. He ought to be removed from the bench. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. a case study in framing. the circus turned a confirmation hearing into a criminal trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Great point, Unblock. I agree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
95. Boy, you totally nailed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iwillnevergiveup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:29 AM Response to Reply #7 |
106. Yes indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 06:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
166. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
27. This is Poppy Bush's joke which paid off for W and has near destroyed the nation.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demoiselle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. What a wonderful comment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #34 |
67. After Thomas was found "mediocre" by the ABA ... Bush/GOP had their opinions.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
39. For what? I'm guessing perjury before Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:21 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. It wasn't 'character |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:28 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. That's right, that was his line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Good point - did he actually deny the accusations (lie) or did he just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
117. he ought to be removed from the bench just because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chelsea0011 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
3. Long Dong Silver! Away! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
28. THAT'S the name I was trying to remember last night. The kind of detail too ludicrous to make up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:51 AM Response to Reply #28 |
49. What helped me decide that Anita was telling the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. He was pretty ... moist, wasn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
72. Sen. Danforth told him .... even if he had done these things .... he'd still stand by him....!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
5. I'm sort of glad the Ginni Thomas brought this back into the news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
6. Let Sleeping Dogs lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Nope and now Mr. Thomas' indescretions will grow a fresh set of legs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speppin (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. I am glad Ms. Thomas opened her big mouth. Glad the woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
57. If clarence was so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
47. She would have heard it as "let sleeping long dongs lie." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bos1 (997 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
8. I remember the hearings. There was no doubt that Anita Hill was telling the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He played the race card and won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I wonder who gave him that line. He certainly didn't come up with it himself - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:46 AM Response to Reply #15 |
48. Yeah, high-tech. She sits on a chair and tells her story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
96. He wasn't lynched, he lied his ass off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:45 AM Response to Reply #96 |
108. Agreed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 03:58 PM Response to Reply #96 |
125. So, it gets an Orwell award, neither high-tech nor a lynching. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
58. done by another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Constance Craving (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
17. Must've been in the air |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadbear (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
18. No reason to let this distraction die |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
119. I agree. Keep the story alive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
20. Maybe its just her dumbassedness shinning through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
22. kick and recommend!! VERY IMPORTANT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ensho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
23. impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
24. About a dozen women were prepared to testify against Clarence Thomas .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #24 |
115. sounds like the committee was holding back---obstruction of justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 06:42 PM Response to Reply #115 |
167. They tried very hard not to even let Congress know about Prof. Hill's charges .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargleamer (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
30. Anita sure could have used her help back then. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
66 dmhlt (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
77. She could not be called to testify ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:04 AM Response to Reply #77 |
116. Biden was wrong, then. He should have opened it up to both social & prof's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 06:56 AM Response to Reply #30 |
178. She told Biden--heck, she WORKED for Biden while she dated Thomas. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
31. Judge McEwen worked for Biden while dating Thomas. Told him about Clarence..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
53. Did she tell Biden? She must have! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GETPLANING (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
36. Clarence Thomas committed perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
84. Ding ding ding. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 06:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
165. a good lawyer could probably make a case that its not clear he did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
38. A-tee and a-hee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. AOLNews - "Ex-Girlfriend: Clarence Thomas 'Was Obsessed With Porn'" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
52. She was on the fucking Judiciary committee as Biden's counsel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
74. Great question ..... !! ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 06:58 AM Response to Reply #52 |
179. Joe knew. He just didn't want to preside over a 'high tech' lynching because of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
59. I bet Thomas is Pissed at his wife for opening this all back up! :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
USA_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
63. Thomas Has Nothing to Worry About |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
65. This is not a can of worms, it is a can of snakes and Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
66. It might get good if Rush and his ilk start quoting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janet118 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:15 AM Response to Reply #66 |
105. Rush was the "best man" at the Thomases' wedding . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #105 |
120. That would be in orwellian newspeek of course "best" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
68. What Gall ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
73. Sez: ''Partial To Women With Large Breasts'' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
76. Q: What did Clarence Thomas say when someone spilled a soft drink in his lap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
81. I would guess that hearing that story is exactly why Ms Thomas called Anita Hill and opened this can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #81 |
90. I think not. I think it was gloating... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:50 PM Response to Reply #90 |
97. I fervently hope that they are are all very, very sadly disappointed.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
92. so wtf didn't Lillian tell the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #92 |
123. as I understand it, there were other women ready and willing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
98. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadine_mn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
99. Note Ginny said "what you did WITH my husband" not "TO" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
103. Yo! Ginni Thomas! Time for some more drunk-dialing, girl! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
111. Wow. I have to question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
114. wow, thanks for not talking when it could have done some good, & giving us Long Dong on SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiranon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
121. Ginny perhaps thought with the Tea Party behind her she could force |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
124. NY Times: Ex-Companion Details ‘Real’ Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
126. A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #127 |
151. It should be remembered she was never clled to testify.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. Sounds like lying before congress to me. Sack him, I say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. I know the deluded fool actually described Supreme Court confirmation hearings of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. Lillian THIS is BS! Where the hell were u 19 years ago when it would have mattered? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #130 |
132. They knew about her, both sides. She has said she wondered when they would call her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #132 |
145. Joe Biden needs to go before congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iliyah (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. He's a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #130 |
144. I don't think Anita Hill's witnesses were called during |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demoiselle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #144 |
159. You are correct, Molly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #144 |
171. He already had the votes for confirmation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INdemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #130 |
161. She wasn't trying to find a book publisher then.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scruffy1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
131. Silly wabbit-those laws and rules don't apply to Rethugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
134. You'd think the same red-faced, bloated "patriots" who chewed the scenery over Bill Clinton's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sulphurdunn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
135. Thomas is just a run of the mill perv. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. If we get him or any of them out, we could tilt the court in a way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
136. Time to Impeach -- but they won't (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
138. No spine in the Dem leadership for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #138 |
157. Yep...just like past presidential elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COLGATE4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
139. It's an even easier case to make a perjurer of Slappy - in his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:56 PM Response to Reply #139 |
163. actually thomas' statement about the lack of discussion of Roe v Wade seems plausible to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
140. Why would he have to resign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #140 |
147. Then an impeachment should be commenced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
141. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
142. Clinton impeached December 19, 1998 - 4 months later - Clinton cited for contempt April 13, 1999 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #142 |
173. It is clear that "High Crimes and Misdemeanor" is whatever Congress finds to be "High Crimes.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 05:55 AM Response to Reply #173 |
177. Thanks I did not know that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
143. If this had come out either during or soon after he gave that testimony it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
146. The impeachment of Clinton was about sex, nor was it about perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
148. Thomas is a typical Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zambero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #148 |
154. Not to mention climbing up the affirmative action ladder.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
149. There are probably 5 perjurers on the Supreme Court right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 03:50 AM Response to Reply #149 |
183. Ooh. Interesting number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
150. Nothing will happen because William Rehnquist and "Operation Eagle Eye" .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 07:04 PM Response to Reply #150 |
168. Nice post ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #126 |
152. Were you also in favor of arresting Bill Clinton for perjury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwentyFive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #126 |
153. Impeach Thomas. He can always find employment at...FAUX NEWS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #126 |
155. This puts Republicans in an untenable position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #155 |
158. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:54 PM Response to Reply #158 |
162. See #126 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 06:02 PM Response to Reply #162 |
164. I read that article. There's nothing in there that says anything about an effort to do anything.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #155 |
169. "claim that the GOP impeachment against Clinton was clearly for political gain" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #126 |
156. OOPS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #126 |
160. KNR! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
172. Lets remember the time period, Bush sr was President, and had Nominated Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 01:17 AM Response to Reply #172 |
176. And thank Arlen Sphincter the POS for his sanctimonious Enabling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC