Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Imam Says Politics Has Stoked Controversy Over Center

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 04:30 AM
Original message
Imam Says Politics Has Stoked Controversy Over Center
Source: NYT

The imam behind the proposed Islamic center near ground zero, Feisal Abdul Rauf, told a Middle Eastern newspaper that he believed election-year politics had stoked the debate over the project and blamed a “tiny, vociferous minority” for leading the opposition, in his most expansive comments yet on the controversy.

“There is no doubt that the election season has had a major impact upon the nature of the discourse,” Mr. Abdul Rauf said in an interview published on Sunday on the Web site of The National, an English-language paper in Abu Dhabi.

The imam said he was intent on eliminating the notion that Islam could be equated with extremism. “The radicals feed off each other and need each other to sustain themselves,” he said. “So we need right now to combat the radical voices. That’s the only way we can win this struggle, and establish a peaceful world order, which is what everybody wants and everybody needs.”

The imam has been relatively silent on the controversy since departing on a two-week tour of the Persian Gulf sponsored by the State Department, even as the furor grows over a project that has become the focus of a fierce national debate over the limits of freedom of religion and the legacy of the Sept. 11 attacks.


Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/30/nyregion/30mosque.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. So it's up to him to help establish a peaceful world order here.
It seems to me that he has more than enough of his own "radical voices" to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Him and his RepubliCronies at Fox 'news' (R)
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That is exactly what he said he is doing.
He was talking about combating the radical voices within the muslim world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. +1
I think that's his actual job description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. wingers delight in wingerism.
and we'll live with that madness for a good few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why weren't the Reichies all up in arms when George W. Bush was
cozying up with Rauf, if he's so evil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "We Repubbies are special. Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R)
Edited on Mon Aug-30-10 06:25 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. “The radicals feed off each other and need each other to sustain themselves"
He said a mouthful right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orbitalman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. So, who needs POLITICS to feed this damned frenzy?
Clearly, this is an extra part of our democracy we DO NOT need. What happened to the forthright representation of democracy? That alone should sustain our republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC