Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia regrets U.S. veto of UN condemning of Yassin killing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 12:58 AM
Original message
Russia regrets U.S. veto of UN condemning of Yassin killing
cRussia regrets U.S. veto of UN condemning of Yassin killing

By Shlomo Shamir, Haaretz Correspondent, Haaretz Service and Reuters

A senior Russian diplomat on Friday voiced regret about the United States move to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israel's killing of Hamas spiritual leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin on Monday.

<snip>

The United States called the resolution "one-sided" and demanded that it include a mention of attacks by Hamas and other militant groups. Algeria, the resolution's sponsor and the only Arab nation member of the council, refused to do that, and the U.S. voted against the measure when it came to a vote Thursday.

Eleven nations, including France, Spain, Russia and China supported the resolution. Three nations - Britain, Germany and Romania - abstained, while the U.S. used its veto power to turn back the resolution.

<snip>

Fedotov said that Russia supported the resolution because it contained "important elements," such as the condemnation of any violence and terror attacks on civilians and the call on all parties to adhere to the road map peace plan for the region, the ITAR-Tass news agency reported.

Meanwhile, Russia's lower house of parliament, the State Duma, on Friday passed a statement noting that "the operation to eliminate (Yassin) carried out by Israel will obviously trigger new bloodshed in the region and endanger the entire process to peacefully settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." The statement was passed in a 317-5 vote, with one abstention.

<snip>

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/409146.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Always the problem child...
Grow up, Uncle Sam, you 228-year old third-grader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here's the text of what the US vetoed:
UPDATE: Here's the text of what the US vetoed:

"The Security Council, recalling its resolutions 242 (1967); 338 (1973), 1397 (2002), 1435 (2002), 1515 (2003),

"Expressing its grave concern at the continued deterioration of the situation on the ground in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, as a result of the escalation of violence and attacks,

"1. Condemns the most recent extrajudicial execution committed by Israel, the occupying Power, that killed Sheikh Ahmed Yassin along with six other Palestinians outside a mosque in Gaza City and calls for a complete cessation of extrajudicial executions;

"2. Condemns also all terrorist attacks against any civilians as well as all acts of violence and destruction;

"3. Calls on all sides to immediately undertake an unconditional cessation of acts of violence, including all acts of terrorism, provocation, incitement and destruction;

"4. Calls for the cessation of all illegal measures and practices and for respect for and adherence to international humanitarian law;

"5. Calls on both parties to fulfill their obligations under the road map endorsed by Security Council resolution 1515 (2003) and to work with the Quartet to implement it in order to achieve the vision of the two states living side by side in peace and security;

"6. Decides to remain seized of the matter."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. How could anyone veto that? It is totally reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It didn't specify Hamas
And since the whole vote was about Yassin, it should have specified that Hamas is a terror group.

But the world doesn't want to hear that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It included terrorism.
See point #2.

This includes what Hamas has done in the past, as well as what all other groups in the area (yes, incl. Israel) have done.

The demand that the resolution include a specific condemnation of Hamas was just a pretext for the veto of this resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It condemned Israel specifically for killing Yassin specifically
You don't get off without condemnin HAMAS specifically as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Maybe because the subject of the resolution was killing Yassin specificall
killing Yassin specifically?

That was more than even-handed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And the subject of his terrorism was Hamas specifically
Hi T, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The US has become the prodigal child given too much too soon.
At least, in some ways. Our country held the admiration of the world for having been strong and determined enough to earn our pride and respect and independence. Unfortunately, instead of acknowledging that it was the blood and sweat and wherewithall of ALL "the people" who brought this country forward, corporate leaders steal those fruits for themselves,...and, worse, have developed such an incredibly unearned sense of entitlement that they feel quite comfortable expoiting their own people.

They do not deserve to be a part of, let alone benefit from, a nation that was built upon the strength and endurance and hope of the whole of its people. They are evil for not only taking their good fortune and their people for granted; but for betraying and manipulating and abusing the people of this country.

They suck!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
swinney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Russia--200 Nukes in one silo--- shiver
Sec of Defense William Perry said it scared him to death.

He visited Russian Nuke sites.

One was well fortified and 7 stories underground.

200 multiple nuclear warhead ICBMs could hit USA in 30 minutes.

Zap. Anger Russians Georgie and you may meet your maker who will not be kind to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. negroponte
is one of the obstacles to world peace. Another minion of the bush cartel dating way back.
http://www.redrat.net/thoughts/terrorists/index.htm

snip --------------
The Senate is ducking its responsibilities in today's pro forma confirmation hearing on Negroponte to be ambassador to the UN

No public witnesses are being heard and no effort is being made by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to carefully scrutinize Negroponte on his role while U.S. ambassador to Honduras in the 1980s, his shady activities on behalf of the Contras at that time or the testimony he provided during his confirmation hearing to be ambassador to Mexico

His past tolerance of human rights abuses in Honduras and his repeated deception of Congress undermine any Negroponte role as a promoter of democracy and a human rights advocate at the UN.
----------more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC