Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World Development Movement urges food market regulation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cory777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 09:56 PM
Original message
World Development Movement urges food market regulation
Source: BBC

Greater regulation of the food market should be introduced by the government to stabilise food prices, according to an anti-poverty group.

A World Development Movement report said banks which caused the financial downturn created volatile food prices.

It said bankers poured money into commodities like wheat and maize after giving up on failed mortgages.

Banks have argued that food price rises are due to increased demand from China and the use of bio-fuels.

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10679723



Your source for Activist News! http://senselessworld-cory.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SunnySong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah cause bureaucratic control of food prices has never backfired....
Good Lord has anyone at the World Development Movement ever read a book????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. have you?
We used to have regulated prices for agricultural goods in the US to ensure that prices were fair, and more importantly, that farmers were paid a living wage. Letting the so-called "free market" take care of these things has led to the destitution of the family farm in favor of the factory farm, the use of undocumented immigrant workers, and a general decline in the standard of living for most Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sigh
Look, the fact is the USSR tried it and it ultimately failed thats just a simple fact, I'm not saying though that a free market is the best approach either because it to has its flaws but I am just saying we need a balanced approach because to much of either one brings about its own problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. When the fuck did regulation equal USSR's collectivization?
Seriously, how the fuck did you connect the USSR to this in your mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Chill out.
Its like the USSR in that they tried price control if you recall and it didnt work to well for them, I'm not saying it will happen here though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. it's called parity
It is nothing like communism. It wouldn't need to exist if there were not independent food producers all working to serve the same market. It used to exist in the US and should still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ok, then. We will leave it in the hands of the bankers
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How many calories are in a pound of Banker?
Grams of protein?

Are they a good source of omega-3?

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunnySong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. They tend to be well marbled not stringy at all.
Edited on Mon Jul-19-10 01:09 PM by SunnySong
I prefer them before Bonus week because I like my meat lean... Of course quality counts make sure your banker has been certified organic and free of cocaine. Some people swear by Kosher but I find the Greenwich meat to be even more tender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Centralized Control = Bad Fucking Idea
Or is anyone stupid enough to imagine such a board would not be controlled my Monsanto and Merck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. of course, the banks are for increased food demand, since that narrows the margins
and allows for even greater volatility, and thus even greater profit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC