Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some Bush Supporters Want Rice to Testify

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MrBadExample Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:16 PM
Original message
Some Bush Supporters Want Rice to Testify
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20040326/ts_nm/security_rice_dc

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Some of President Bush (news - web sites)'s fellow Republicans said on Friday that he should let national security adviser Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) testify publicly to confront charges by a former aide that Bush was lax on terrorism ahead of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Their comments appeared to reflect concerns over potential political damage to the president by the charges of former counterterrorism aide Richard Clarke. Bush is seeking a second term by running on his record as an anti-terror warrior.

One of the president's closest allies on Capitol Hill, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican, gave a gentle nudge to Bush. He said he would support Bush's decision to stand on principle and not have Rice testify in public before a panel investigating the attacks.

But Frist added: "Personally, I think her voice is so good, so powerful that to have her come before the 9/11 commission publicly would be to the administration's benefit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Frist must not have gotten his memo
telling him that the shut-uppin' was necessary to keep the facade from burning down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The memo came from Kean
this is the exact same thing he said in their little press conference after the hearings the other day. He said the WH shot themselves in the foot by not letting her testify this week, because she would have been such a good witness.

Nice spin. Of course, she will never testify publicly or under oath, so they can claim anything they want how she would have done.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, Bill, she's not testifying because she doesn't want to
perjure herself. Otherwise she would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. BUT NOT UNDER OATH SO THE WITCH CAN LIE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If it's public, she has to be under oath
I heard this yesterday on...NPR or somewhere, not sure.

Anyway, it was said that all public appearances before the commission must be under oath, that they had set up the rules that way. Which is of course, why we'll NEVER see her on the stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. She's not a witch.
Witches are nice, peace-loving people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdeca Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You have never seen....
The Wizard of OZ. Only good witches are beautiful. Wicked witches are ugly. I rest my case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey Bill didn't you get the memo
She was probably the one that told CNN and others

" it "a mistake" to focus "so much energy on Osama bin Laden."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Reminds me
of when some republicans didn't get the memo when the story was circulated about the Clinton staff trashing offices when they left and left pornography on the computers. Some actually thought it was true and called for an investigation before they were told to be quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. they're realizing their ship is sinking
if she doesn't testify in public, they're fucked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is he blind?
"But Frist added: 'Personally, I think her voice is so good, so powerful that to have her come before the 9/11 commission publicly would be to the administration's benefit.'"

Obviously the good doctor was performing life-saving surgery for free on indigent patients or rounding up homeless cats to take to an animal shelter (to which he donates generously, natch) when Condi gave her press conferences in May 2002 after info surfaced that the administration knew more about the attacks than they had let on.
She shook, her voice quavered and she came off as weak and a terrible liar.
Most of her other appearances before the press are embarassing and it's plain that in addition to her obvious lying about September 11th, she's a shitty public speaker.

Frist must be delusional if he thinks putting her before the commission will somehow counter the powerful testimony of Richard Clark. If that's the best Frist thinks they can do, then he either has a poor grasp of reality or has never seen Condi on television answering to the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devinsgram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. It makes it look
like she is hiding something really damaging. Ah, one can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. He should "let her"??? The King should allow his jester to testify?
Who the hell is he to say whether she testifies or not? Why do Republicans always need a "Daddy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Let her dig a deeper hole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC