Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alabama AG blasts proposal for Gulf spill fund

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:18 AM
Original message
Alabama AG blasts proposal for Gulf spill fund
Source: AP

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - Alabama's attorney general says a proposal for administering the Gulf oil spill compensation fund is an illegal attempt to limit BP's liability and an effort to usurp the power of the states.

Attorney General Troy King received draft 9 of the protocol from administrator Kenneth Feinberg. King says he was shocked the federal government and BP worked on that many drafts before contacting Gulf states for input.

King has sent a letter to the president saying the draft protocol is needlessly complicated and would limit the ability of Gulf coast residents to recover their losses. King is urging the president to make Feinberg scrap the draft and replace it with one that puts Gulf states' citizens first.

Read more: http://www.wsfa.com/Global/story.asp?S=12801666




The other Gulf states attorneys should jump on this issue also.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is there something he cannot grasp
about Fienberg being independant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Is there something you don't grasp about powers reserved to the states under Amendment 10? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why would I have clue
about your Amendments - I'm english.

If it were to become clear that Fineberg was not acting independantly then you could maybe write off the escrow fund which is volantary arrangement based on an independant controller. Which would you prefer ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for the explanation. Behind media reports is the belief by Gulf Coast businesses & residents
that as with past environmental disasters in the region they will only receive a few dimes for each dollar in damages.

In this case my relatives and friends who live along the Gulf Coast from Key West FL to Brownsville TX expect government will shield BP from paying for the damages they have received caused by BP's oil spill.

I agree with them because IMO the direct and indirect damages could far exceed BP's assets even if the corporate veil was pierced and individual wealth of stockholders were made vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I would seriously expect
the whole lot to go to the Gulf - eventually.

As far as I'm aware liability of stockholders, if any , would be restricted to balance sheet share value which is actually 25 cents / share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah....
... you definitely aren't an American if you believe that. These funds rarely pay out more than a percentage of the money to the victims they're meant for. Politicians love control of money, and they'll do whatever they can to retain control of it once they have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Slight diference here
BP plc is UK registered and it's auditors will want general oversight to ensure funds were used as prescribed - not to make valued judgements of usage by merit but simply to ensure the sort of hanky panky you describe did not occur. If Fineberg were to protest in any way then inflow to the escrow account could cease up. As a public company BP would be obliged to ensure propriety in this matter on behalf of their shareholders under company law if nothing elase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Fienberg is not independent

Anyone thinking so is clueless. Fienberg is a politician who was the administration "Pay Czar" for banksters. As you may note, under Fienberg's protection, no bankster received one penny less than was received prior to the crash. Most are better off today.

Fienberg is very very pro-corporate.

The first statement out of Fienberg's mouth when taking the BP fund position was "It is in no one's best interest to see BP hurt".

Fienberg is very pro-corporate and the opposite of independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You're right. Feinberg's scum.
This is the guy who decided the "value" of 9/11 victims' lives. Being that he's scum, he awarded vastly more to the families of rich people than those of laborers. Because the lives of rich people are so much more valuable.

Feinberg fits right in with the pattern of Rahm, Geithner, Summers . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. well damn what does that say about president obama. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. BP's liability cannot be determined until all the damage has been determined both direct & indirect
Our Constitution does not give any government agency authority to limit the damages for which a person or corporation is liable.

The only limitation for a defendant is her/his/its wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. My fiance was laughing about that the night the fund was announced
He blurted out "Suckers!" to the TV when the fund was announced.

I love my fiance dearly but...DAMMIT I hate it when he's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC