Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gen. Stanley McChrystal has submitted his resignation, an unnamed source told Time magazine.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:48 PM
Original message
Gen. Stanley McChrystal has submitted his resignation, an unnamed source told Time magazine.
Source: CNN

Gen. Stanley McChrystal has submitted his resignation, Time magazine's Joe Klein told CNN Monday, citing an unnamed source. CNN is working to confirm Klein's information.

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/06/22/latest-mcchrystal-developments/

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. When's he due to arrive in Washington? I'm thinking Obama will wait until
he speaks with him before making it official. Or maybe not. So many political games. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He should land in DC tomorrow. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
68. Olbermann: Pres. Barack Obama shouldn't accept a resignation from Gen Stanley McChrystal

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/36812318#37862690
In a Special Comment, Countdown's Keith Olbermann argues that President Barack Obama shouldn't accept a resignation from General Stanley McChrystal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political_Junkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good news
if it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, if that is the case
I suppose one option for Mr. Obama would be to refuse to accept the resignation and offer up a courts martial for Stan. I'd love to see him busted out and reduced rank for retirement. You know he will become a Faux Noise consultant and continue to dribble out traitorous crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. He threw that info to Rolling Stone to help the Republicans. Intentional. He should
be court-marshaled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good. I'm only sorry he wasn't fired.
When I think of how many men and women in our armed forces dutifully held their tongues under Bushco, this guy makes me want to puke. McChrystal is a traitor to this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. He should count his lucky stars that no one other than me has mentioned Courtmartial!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
64. That's not typically an offense prosecuted under Courts Martial
Unless it's aggravated. Simply saying off the cuff comments about Obama wouldn't fall under that. Organizing something and say, running a protest campaign might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #64
73. Agree. It's possible, but not typical--especially at this level.
He ought to be fired. Other discipline is possible (but not likely here):

During the Clinton Administration, a number of military
officers have been disciplined for making disrespectful comments
about President Clinton. Early in the Clinton presidency
an Air Force General was fined, reprimanded, and forced into
early retirement for referring to the President as “‘gay-loving,’
‘womanizing,’ ‘draft-dodging,’ and ‘pot-smoking,’” during an
Air Force banquet speech.1 Three years later, another Air Force
general was reprimanded for telling an inappropriate joke about
President Clinton during a speech at an Air Force base in
Texas.2 More recently, two Marine Corps officers were administratively
punished for published letters to newspapers that
were disrespectful to the President,3 and military officials
warned the remainder of the Armed Forces against engaging in
similar misconduct.4


http://tullylegal.com/article88.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. He knows we're losing in Afghanistan and seeks to shift the blame,
in my opinion. He has dishonored the service by his comments. I hope Pres. Obama accepts his resignation and reduces his rank in the process. Even one star less would be a reminder that even Generals are not free to openly express opposition to the President. He could do so in private and then offer to resign. After resigning, he can give any interviews he wants. Good for Rolling Stone in getting Gen. McChrystal's thoughts out there. Perhaps with someone else in charge, someone who is not pushing for more troops and more war, we can exit Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. Yup, Obama gave him everything he asked for and he still fucked it up
But if he is allowed to resign he can turn it all around and blame the president for non support.

There should be some public shame doled out to this piece a shit to keep him from becoming a fixture on right wing talk radio trashing the pres.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. Warmongering, conservative, rat jumping ship before it sinks
McChrystal botched his job, slandered his commander, and is now running for the tall grass. He will be back as a program leader for General Dynamics making big bucks before the end of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. IN afghanistan, what is there to win? What is there to lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. MAN UP ASSHOLE. You're still going in to see PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanie Baloney Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Totally off-topic, but...
I sure mis-read your subject line. I thought ...well, I think you know what I thought.

LOL





:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Place yer bets for his private industry payday:
Fox News commentator?
Cushy defense contractor?
Doesn't Blackwater need a CEO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Tea Party leader
and activist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
45. Defense contractor.
McChrystal doesn't strike me as the Fox News contributor type--he's not in Oliver North's league as far as greasy and slimy goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
48. Fox and then Tea Party backing for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. Commander in Chief of the "Oath Keepers"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #55
70. that's some scary stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #55
74. I can easily see such a political element seizing our government, in the coming years.
After reading the Rolling Stone article, I can see McChrystal as a leader of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Mullion Blasto Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good news if true
Better news would be if Obama fired him, as he should have done when he started acting out over the troop increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. No confirmation yet, apparently.
Can't find it anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think his letter of resignation is because he's been fired no?
Isn't that the way it happens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IOKIYAL Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Looks better to quit after you messed up than to be fired after you messed up.
The former implies that you owned up to your mistakes. This way he can leave with less shame and disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. If true, is this a preemptive move
to make it look like he quit and wasn't fired? Or maybe he wanted to lessen the butt kicking waiting for him in DC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I think it's pretty standard to write a letter of resignation because it means
You've been fired if you're summoned to the President's office for making a general ass out of yourself and grossly embarrassed your President, your entire military branch and most Americans. Of course I'm sure he's a hero to FOX and friends, so that's who he should keep company with for the rest of his living days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Thanks
I had no idea how it works.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. He can resign his post but can anyone in the armed forces resign from the armed forces before
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 04:25 PM by w4rma
their renewal time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Officers can resign at any time.
Officers are not enlisted; they do not have specific service commitments (apart from service academy graduates). If not faced with mandatory separation due to being passed over for promotion, there are maximum service limits; but in practice an officer may resign his commission before that limit is reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I'm probably wrong
but my understanding was that officer's don't have commitments to be officers (they can resign their commission), but depending on the situation may be required to stay in the service as an enlisted person until their term of service is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Again, officers don't have a term of service as such.
Except for service academy graduates (who have a minimum service commitment) and ROTC graduates whose university educations were partly funded by military scholarships (who have a requirement of three years' active duty and five reserve)...and directly commissioned officers have a minimum term of service of three years; beyond those limits officers are free to resign their commissions (assuming the resignation is accepted).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #33
65. All officers are subject to ADSC - Active Duty Service Commitment
Officers don't have enlistments. They are commissioned by the President of the United States and serve at the leisure of the President. However, the services can and do impose service commitments (ADSCs) for training incurred and other things. Academy graduates must serve at least 5 years. ROTC and OTS/OCS graduates must serve 4. Getting a Permanent Change of Station (PCS) incurs a 2 year ADSC. Specialty training (such as flight training) incurs other commitments. The USAF's current ADSC for graduating pilot training is 10 years from the date of graduation. Going through advanced training often incurs a 2-4 year ADSC, depending on what it is. Most ADSCs are done concurrently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. he shouldn't be allowed to get off this easy
Insubordination should be dealt with. Bust his ass and send him back to Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaye52 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. President should not accept his resignation
He should be fired for violating the military code of conduct. And stripped of his stars. And face court martial. This has been coming for some time. He is a disgrace to the uniform and the men and women who serve faithfully.

He's a fucking liar. I will never forget what he did to the Tillman family. I'd write more but I am too angry to put it into words. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. A man with no respect for the blood that has been spilled for oil and drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. Absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
57. his behaviour over the Tillman affair is reason enough to bust his sorry ass to buck private
and THEN send him back to Afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. People routinely resign before they can be fired all the time. I've done, I'm sure many at DU have.
For good, bad, or otherwise this happens all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. He's setting him self up for a political run, but he should be court-marshaled.
Thanks for the thread, Amerigo Vespucci.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. Don't accept it, President Obama.
Bust the general for insubordination and make him face military justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. Clarification: He has NOT submitted resignation. He HAS offered to resign.
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 04:42 PM by Tx4obama
From HuffPo:

Klein clarified that his source says McChrystal has offered to resign, but has not officially submitted his resignation.

=====

Appearing on CNN on Tuesday afternoon, Klein said, "I think he's probably going to lose his job. A little bit of news: I was just talking to a very reliable source who tells me that McChrystal has submitted his resignation and it's going to be up to the president...to accept it or not tomorrow." After the television appearance, Klein clarified that his source says McChrystal has offered to resign, but has not officially submitted his resignation.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/22/general-mcchrystal-offers_n_621613.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. General Officers dont get fired. They resign
like there is an undated resignation letter on the desk of the SecDef at any time.

this trend is troubling, where these generals act like public figures and celebrities, and seemingly (knowingly) violate UCMJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. Not good enough. He deserves a court martial!
Why should we the taxpayers continue to foot his enormous benefit bill because he was insubordinate to the Supreme Commander in Chief?

If one of his soldiers had gone public with news about him, prison might be the better alternative.

We are at "war". McChrystal should pay the supreme price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. MSNBC: McChrystal has NOT OFFERED to resign, but is prepared to do so. n/t
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 05:09 PM by Tx4obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. And just how do they know what is in his head??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Updates from Huffington Post...
...the CNN content in the OP is what they had as breaking news, and it has obviously changed since they reported it.

UPDATE: Gen. Stanley McChrystal has offered to resign his position in the wake of an explosive Rolling Stone interview, according to Time magazine's Joe Klein.

Appearing on CNN on Tuesday afternoon, Klein said, "I think he's probably going to lose his job. A little bit of news: I was just talking to a very reliable source who tells me that McChrystal has submitted his resignation and it's going to be up to the president...to accept it or not tomorrow." After the television appearance, Klein clarified that his source says McChrystal has offered to resign, but has not officially submitted his resignation.

Likewise, NBC's Chuck Todd tweeted on Tuesday evening, "Senior admin aides: McCrystal has not offered his resignation but has informed superiors he is prepared to do so... There is a path for Gen. McCrystal to save his job; everything depends on how the meeting w/POTUS goes tomorrow morning."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/22/general-mcchrystal-offers_n_621613.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. The MSNBC report is AFTER the HuffPo report.
Ed Show on MSNBC: McChrystal HAS NOT offered to resign, but is prepared to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. OK, you win the pissing contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. LOL,, sorry I beat the dead horse ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
37. Stanley is hoping the Prez will not accept it. I sure hope he will. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. I'd rather see him sent out of the way... overseeing Guam perhaps
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 06:02 PM by tomm2thumbs

Fox is probably already drawing up contracts to try and hire him if he leaves the military

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. And not ONE SINGLE...
person on the other side should do anything besides applaud.

after all it is unamerican and unpatriotic to disaparage a president at a time of war.

who said that?

they ALL said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
66. To be fair...
I bet you supported military officers who openly disparaged Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #66
75. In the Bush era many generals *resigned first*
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 11:38 AM by CJCRANE
before they disagreed openly with the president or civilian chain of command. IIRC none of them disparaged him publicly while on active duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. I was talking about the handful of officers that openly criticized the president
...and then either got discharged or tried by courts martial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
47. Good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
50. Oh happy day!!!! I hope he is court martialed, and NOT replaced. Instead, BRING OUR TROOPS HOME!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. "McChrystal is prepared to resign"
It's almost as if he wants to quit. What an asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
52. Who the fuck leaked it to Klein? McChrystal himself?
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 06:46 PM by Turborama
Gen. Stanley McChrystal has "offered to resign," according to a Twitter post from Time magazine's Joe Klein on Tuesday. Earlier, Klein, citing "a very reliable source," told CNN that McChrystal had already submitted his resignation.

The Twitter post from Klein's magazine offered the "clarification" that the general has "'offered to resign' he has NOT submitted his resignation."

From the latest update: http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/06/22/latest-mcchrystal-developments/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dyingnumbers Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
54. Like it or not...
The criteria for what makes legitimate free speech becomes subjective when, for instance, the opinions of one public official do not reflect the prevailing attitude, so the consequences for dissent are more pronounced, because so much is at stake in the war.

Rolling Stone profile not McChrystal's first misstep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Article 88 of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)
888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

http://www.constitution.org/mil/ucmj19970615.htm

"Free speech" doesn't apply when it comes to military matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #56
69. Wow. Pretty harsh.
Good to see there's actual law covering this, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
58. Aw, shucks. He was just doing his job.
He and his boys didn't say anything that most military brass doesn't think anyway...

They just said it out loud in front of a reporter...ooops.

A large number of the (blood thirsty) troops hate his namby-pamby "war making"...they want to kick down doors and blow away ragheads -- poor dears -- and McChrystal's COIN fad won't let them...

As I said before, "nothing to see here", just business as usual among the legions of the USAmerikan Empire...

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Stanley saw Afghanistan is not winnable....so...he shot off his mouth
to a reporter....will be in hot water for a very short time...will eat crow...then retire and have a nice life with a nice pension......meanwhile the rest of the troops are stuck in that hell hole he helped to create...

This all part of your plan Stan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
59. I've wondered from the start if McChrystal's conduct was deliberate,
in order to accomplish some strategic goal.

I'm thinking, e.g., of how MacArthur used p.r. to build up his popularity in the States to such an extent that he achieved considerable leverage over US political policy re- WWI in Asia.

I don't think that's exactly what McChrystal was trying to do -- but his conduct seems at least semi-inexplicable. On NPR today, Joe Klein said, even the worst of the reported remarks were made while Joe obviously held a recorded in one hand and a pen in the other. By all reports, McChrystal is not a stupid man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
61. The military is the WRONG TOOL
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 10:33 PM by ProudDad
for any job that doesn't include killing folks and blowing shit up...!!!

If I were king, I'd shovel in Cricket and soccer teams, NGOs loaded down with building materials and school supplies, mediation specialists; the right tools for the job...

I'd end the phony "war on drugs(tm)" and the phony "war on terra(tm)" and pay reparations for the damage the Empire has done around the world...

And save money...

But no, here in the Empire, every problem can only be "solved" with a cop or an army...

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #61
67. Yes they want to "Kill Em All"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
62. As well he should. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert DAH Bruce Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
63. Fuckin' A!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
71. That sucks! - Obama needed to fire him, Stanley must have gotten wind of the end results
Obama really needed to fire the good general. it's called respect and you don't pull BS. like Limbaugh will do - when you know your going to end up being in Obama/Drama-Obama's face!
Gen. Stanley McChrystal wannabee's now know better to make sure they go back using the old ways to get a point out without losing your career and looking like an ass while doing it... "an unnamed source labeled the president as "Drama-Obama" today. ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
72. A formality
He's probably hoping the prez will decline to accept the resignation.

If not, well, I think his pension and health benefits are secure for life. He'll do just fine, thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
76. Good. ALL dissent must be abolished. He knows better than to do what he did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC