Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Liberal, NDP insiders talk merger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:02 PM
Original message
Liberal, NDP insiders talk merger
Source: CBC

Senior insiders with the federal Liberals and New Democrats have been holding secret talks about the possibility of merging their parties to form a new entity to take on the Conservatives, CBC News has learned.

Many Liberal insiders confirmed that discussions between the two parties are not just focused on forming a coalition after an election or co-operation before one, but the creation of a new party.

The new party would possibly be named the Liberal Democrats and there has been tentative talk about what a shared platform would look like and an understanding that a race would be required to choose a new leader.

"Serious people are involved in discussions at a serious level," Warren Kinsella, a former adviser to former prime minister Jean Chrétien, told CBC News.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/06/08/liberal-ndp-new-party.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Noooooo.
So that the center-right Liberals can wipe out the progressive NDP? Terrible idea. They would become a powerless minority in a merged party. Sound familiar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, that would be a terrible idea. Canada needs PR and party-lists for its elections instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. PR is an EXTREMELY bad idea.
look how it works in Israel. The two mainstream parties are reliant on a few extremist kook parties to maintain power. In a PR system, the NDP would be broken up into four or five parties, and completely disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Extremism is mainstream in Israel (i.e. Likud), the election method has nothing to do with it.
Secondly, the assertion that the NDP would break apart due to PR is baseless. The claim that PR (or mixed-member) systems are "inherently unstable" is always trotted out by right-wingers in "US government" textbooks. However, the reality of such systems is far from the spooky picture depicted by such propagandists. Consider reading The Politics of Electoral Systems (edited by Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell) for a comparative study on election methods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Agree. PR is badly needed to bring some fairness to the electoral system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. The is EXACTLY how the NDN works. They ARE republicans.
And it's a really smart republican strategy to split the Democratic party. The NDN has unlimited "think tank" and corporate money. We need to make sure computerized elections are not fixed first, and then just purge the party of the republican infiltrators they call the "blue dogs". They're dogs, alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. You do know this article is about Canadian politics, right?
Edited on Wed Jun-09-10 11:06 AM by Posteritatis
And is talking about doing the opposite of splitting parties? And that our elections generally aren't computerized? And that this article is about Canadian politics, because it seems to need repeating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not gonna happen, especially with the current party leaders
Seeing as they're more interested in fighting each other than in presenting a united front of any kind against the Conservatives - when they aren't actively supporting the Conservatives - I can't exactly see either willing to let the other have a substantial stake in their identity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC