Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fighter Jets Escort Plane to Vancouver

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:21 PM
Original message
Fighter Jets Escort Plane to Vancouver
Source: Associated Press

Filed at 9:02 p.m. ET

VANCOUVER, British Columbia (AP) -- Canadian fighter jets escorted a Cathay Pacific airliner incoming from Hong Kong to a safe landing in Vancouver International Airport on Saturday due to a potential security threat, a North American Aerospace Defense Command spokesperson said.

The Canadian Press news agency cited Canadian Defense department officials as saying there was a bomb threat aboard Flight CX838, but they could not provide details.

Television images showed the plane on an isolated stretch of tarmac, where it had been towed away from the main airport terminal.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/05/15/world/AP-CN-Canada-Plane-Threat.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elias49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. The daily scare
Can't wait for tomorrow's boogie-man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. What could a fighter plane do to help out...that would only of freaked out
if I saw that. Actually if there was possibly a bomb on board i would not have wanted to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Um, shoot it down if it veered off course and headed to a strategic target?
You know, like the USAF and/or NORAD SHOULD have done on 9-11, except for that stand down order....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybster1000 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Do you think that happened over Pennsylvania?
I know some former Armed Services people who think that the plane that "crashed' over PA was actually taken down. It was over countryside so no/few civilians would be harmed. The pictures show the plane to be in total debris..barely recognizable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There was no stand down
that's a Truther myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So, USAF and NORAD are just completely incompent?
That seems unlikely.

They sent fighters up when that small jet with the golfer in in failed to respond. They just couldn't do it on 9-11?

Yeah, just truther stuff... USAF can't protect because, well, why? Logic suggests they could and just didn't or they can't and we are paying a lot for nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigan-Arizona Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. +2
K & R for this post alone! And wasn't the guy in charge of that, wasn't 9/11 his first day on the job? or was that another guy? or just a coinkydink? I can't recall now, but there was added confussion due to a major player not knowing whether to wind his ass or scratch his watch because it was his first day on the job. Another forum I know. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. agree. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. They sent fighters up on 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It took over an hour and a half to intercept Payne Stewart's plane
Edited on Sun May-16-10 09:50 PM by hack89
it was an ad hoc affair using unarmed planes already on training flights. Dedicated interceptors were not used.

A simple challenge I have asked many truthers - none of which could answer. Show me where the Air Force has ever routinely intercepted airliners over the continental US - they only intercepted unidentified planes approaching US airspace. Research ADIZ and ask yourself why the first overland ADIZs were not put in place until after 911.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. North American air defense is pretty much a myth.
A few Air National Guard units (with superb men and women), but no active interceptor force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Post 911 it is very robust
pre-911 you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC