Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Drug offender' could be added to licenses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:23 PM
Original message
'Drug offender' could be added to licenses
Source: Shreveport Times

BATON ROUGE — Second-conviction felony drug dealers should have that noted on their driver's licenses, a House committee said Tuesday.

The House Transportation, Highways and Public Works Committee unanimously approved House Bill 139 by Rep. Rickey Hardy, D-Lafayette, after increasing the fee assessed on offenders from $10 to $25 to cover the cost of issuing a special license with "DRUG OFFENDER" in bright orange on the bottom. Similar licenses with "SEX OFFENDER" already are issued to people convicted of certain sex crimes.

Hardy said the main goal of his legislation is to "give the officer who would stop that person a heads-up who he's dealing with, to let him know that person has been involved in criminal activity and might be armed."

The legislation was supported by state police Maj. Dewayne White.

Read more: http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/20100407/NEWS01/4070318/1004/LIVING/Drug-offender-could-be-added-to-licenses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have an alternate suggestion
We legalize all drugs and stuff the prohibition nonsense into the garbage can of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. +1000% . . . but I'm starting to think too embedded in MIC now . . . national security ... that is .
excuse to invade other countries!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe it should read, "It's okay, I'm cool." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck every piece of shit that keeps trying to ratchet up the drug war.
God damn them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. As long as it also gets put on the driver's licenses of doctors who overprescribe
and rich people who doctor-shop for multiple prescriptions. Then I'm fine with it. Otherwise, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pharmacies and liquor stores owners are exempt of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Liscnses of Republicans should be emblazoned with
TERMINALLY STUPID
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess "DUMB ENOUGH TO GET CAUGHT TWICE" wouldn't fit?
It's a bit of an IQ indicator on the drivers license, so maybe printing an IQ number isn't far behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. What's ever happened to paying one's debt to society? I'm thinking about
drug offenders in particular. I wonder if this decision might hinder recovery....I just don't like this idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thank you.
That *was* the point of serving time/paying fines, etc., to pay one's debt to society?

Guess that notion has become "quaint" too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. The sex offender registries already put paid to that idea.
Next it will be drug offenders, as we see in this OP. After that, assaulters. Then we'll decide grand theft auto will be reason for being on a list. Following that, it's a short step to thieves in general. Then we'll move to misdemeanor convictions. Once those categories are on a list, we'll add simple moving violations.

All because we started with sex offender registries, which made such lists oh so very very easy to rationalize.

I told you all when this started with the sex offenders. I bloody told everyone here that exactly this would happen, and was labeled as a "sex offender apologist" or some such. Well, well, well. I guess I was right after all.

:grr:

We should not tolerate any public "lists", even for sex offenders. We should not keep such public lists at all!

If the Authoritarians have their way, every last least littlest criminal will be on a "list", and we will thereby create a class of society that is unhousable, unemployable, ineducable, and generally "undesirable". And guess what will happen when we have a large segment of "undesirables", and a party willing to implement a "final solution" to that "problem"?

Hyperbole? Well, it was. Until we started keeping lists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. And a little more of the Constitution shreds away to dust...
Soon there will be nothing left.

sadly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Very bad. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. What? No scarlet letter?
This just creeps me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. We're moving forward...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hmm - no "ALCOHOL OFFENDER" category?
They'd make a fortune off that one . . .

:sarcasm:

So much for paying one's debt to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. to "give the officer who would stop that person a heads-up"
who he's dealing with, to let him know that person has been involved in criminal activity and might be armed."

Mmm-kay. And the point of putting "SEX OFFENDER" on licenses is? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. This bright idea came from Rep. Rickey Hardy -- a Democrat!!
Well, a supposed Democrat, anyway.

Also supported by another Democrat:
Rep. Sam Jones, D-Franklin, who got the committee to increase the fee so it covers the license cost, told Hardy "I wouldn't mind amending the bill to paint their cars white with pink polka dots."


Louisiana has some problem "Democratic" representatives. One other Dem, Barbara Norton, raised the only objection, to her credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. You mean a "Democrat"...
Hobbies include attending NRA rallies, lynching negroes, burning crosses, and drinking shitty moonshine brewed by his inbred uncle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. What we need is a list of convictions under corporate logos - not this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. They should do this with sex offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. And murderers and thieves and child molesters and embezzlers and people
Edited on Wed Apr-07-10 09:43 PM by notadmblnd
that commit fraud and drunk drivers. If they can list one crime on a drivers license, then they can list all crimes on a driver's license. Why just single out one group of criminals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. Why not brand it on their forehead for that matter...?
Would be about the same...

Think how many transactions require a DL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rapier09 Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. That is not a R next to his name

Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Congratulations on increasing the number of jobs in the fake ID industry!
Either that, or people with one conviction will be induced to keep old, expired licenses to try and alter the dates. A fake ID won't fool a cop with a computer in his cruiser, but you can bet the market will boom for forgeries to be used in other situations where privacy is preferred.

Hell, I think putting a label on the license for alcohol offenders is of far more "violence-prevention" value to an officer than this. Not that this matters anyway, as by the time the police officer actually sees your license, he's right next to you and thus already vulnerable to attack. The officer also has access via the DMV and plate number to the information regarding the owner of the vehicle and can prepare himself that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. Second conviction felony drug offenders shouldn't have a license at all
Does the state need the revenue from the license fees THAT much?

:eyes:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC